|
The London Strategic Health Authority was formed by merging five old
strategic health authorities. This page has always covered the whole of
London.
For archived material see:
London SHA to 2006 (including
Annual Health Check 2006)
The summary articles in the table below related to the strategic health
authority area are copied from the following pages, indicated in the table by
key numbers.
-
Charges
-
Construction projects
-
Resource shortfall Sources
-
Treatment approval or not
- Withdrawal of Local Facilities -
Sources
Other
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Summary articles |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS trusts force
patients to wait longer for operations. Patients in some parts of the
National Health Service are for the first time facing minimum waits to be
seen and treated as managers attempt to balance their books.
Suffolk,
Hertfordshire,
North Yorkshire and
Kingston are all
imposing various forms of minimum wait, with some primary care trust chiefs
saying their organisations may follow suit as the NHS battles to recover
from last year's £500m-plus overspend. Hospitals treating patients from
north, east and west Hertfordshire have been told not to book them in for
non-urgent operations until the start of the new financial year in April.
Similar restrictions will apply to new outpatient appointments from the end
of January. Patients in Suffolk are having to wait a minimum of 14 weeks for
routine surgery and York NHS Trust has been told by its local primary care
trust not to operate on non-urgent cases until they have waited a minimum of
20 weeks - six weeks short of the government's guarantee that patients will
not wait more than six months for an operation. Kingston primary care trust
is operating a standard 10-week wait for outpatient appointments - three
weeks short of the13-week maximum wait. Patricia Hewitt, the health
secretary, has acknowledged that a slight rise in overall waiting times
earlier this financial year was due to some parts of the NHS setting minimum
waits on "patient referrals, diagnostic tests and treatment" to "negate the
financial deficit". Michael Dixon, chairman of the NHS Alliance, which
represents primary care trusts, said: "This is a direct effect of payment by
results. In the old days of cost and volume contracts it wasn't an issue
because hospitals didn't get paid any more if they treated more patients
than planned." Now that they are paid for each patient they treat, "if a
hospital brings its waiting list down rapidly it will do an awful lot of
extra work and blow the primary care trusts' budget", he said.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Financial
Times 2 January 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Outrage as school
nurses are axed. Headteachers have been left outraged after being told their
school nurses were being withdrawn - with just two working days notice. The cuts
were revealed earlier this month when
Wandsworth Primary
Care Trust sent a letter to 16 of the borough's schools - 10 of which are in
Battersea - to say that due to a large number of vacancies there would be a
temporary closure of the School Nursing Service. The debt-ridden primary care
trust will still carry out its statutory requirements for children such as
immunisation programmes. It blamed a recruitment crisis for the withdrawal of
the nurses, who are widely regarded as being on the front line in fighting
issues such as domestic abuse and teenage pregnancy. The trust is currently
trying to recruit three school nurses and one nursery nurse so the service can
be resumed early next year, but Councillor Kathy Tracey, cabinet member for
children, is unimpressed. "It's pretty catastrophic," she said. "We know they
had problems with recruiting but it's absolutely bizarre that no notice
whatsoever was given and that the schools all seem to be in very deprived areas.
All the work we have done to bring children's services together in the last two
years is in jeopardy."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Wandsworth
Guardian 5 January 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Leading hospital did not reveal damning report into heart surgery. A
Guardian investigation has led to calls for greater transparency in the NHS
after it emerged that heart surgery patients at an elite teaching hospital were
exposed to "serious clinical risk", according to a report that was not made
public. The hitherto confidential report by Sir Bruce Keogh, one of the most
eminent cardiothoracic surgeons in Britain, said facilities for heart patients
at St Mary's hospital trust in Paddington in west
London, were "almost
certainly the worst in the country".John Carvel, social affairs editor
Monday
January 8, 2007 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
'Job and bed cutter'
is new NHS boss. The appointment of a new interim chief executive at
Epsom and St Helier
NHS University Hospitals Trust has sparked further speculation over its future.
Graham Smith took over the position on January 4 after the departure of his
predecessor Lorraine Clifton. The former chief executive left the trust after
criticism from Surrey health scrutiny committee for planning significant changes
without adequate public consultation. Mr Smith has filled the same position for
brief periods at various trusts across the country over the past six years.
Prior to accepting the job at Epsom and St Helier he was interim chief executive
at South Warwickshire General Hospitals NHS Trust from May until September 2006.
While there, he was challenged with saving £9m in a year to try and bring down
Warwick Hospital's £23m deficit. At the time, the Warwick Courier reported that
due to merging wards the medical unit only had four staff looking after 39
patients from midnight onwards. Geoff Martin, head of campaigns at pressure
group London Health Emergency, said: "It's like he has been on a national tour.
He's been all over the country and seems to go to trusts to cut jobs and beds."
Mr Martin urged people to continue putting pressure on the trust to cease cuts
and closures. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Sutton
Guardian 12 January 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
PCT hikes drug
prices. A radical shake-up in prescribing medicine could mean some of the
borough's sickest residents are forced to pay more for their drugs. Since
January, doctors' surgeries in
Sutton and Merton
are being encouraged to prescribe regular medication to last for 28 days, which
the primary care trust (PCT) says will cut wastage and allow for regular
monitoring. But it could mean those on regular medication paying £6.65 a month,
rather than the same charge for a longer-lasting supply. Geoff Martin, head of
campaigns for pressure group, Health Emergency, and a Unison official said: "It
sounds like the PCT is using this to claw back more money." One Merton resident
used to pay £13.30 for a six-month supply of two types of drugs she has taken
regularly since having cancer. She is furious and said: "I'll now have to pay
£159.60 a year. I may have to do without one of the drugs now if I can't afford
it. My GP is extremely angry and is concerned that residents have not been made
aware of the new scheme and will only realise once they get to the chemists."
The PCT insists that '28-prescribing' is a well-publicised and positive move. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Sutton
Guardian 12 January 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Catalogue of abuse in NHS care homes. Learning disabled were physically
and sexually assaulted in units. The NHS faces being stripped of its
responsibility for learning disability services after inspectors today issue the
second damning report in six months into the care of some of the most vulnerable
members of society. People with learning disabilities had been subjected to
physical and sexual abuse at a hospital in
London, according to
an investigation by the Healthcare Commission. One member of staff was jailed
for six years last summer after being charged with rape of a woman resident who
was considered unable to give consent due to her low mental age. A second staff
member had been given a suspended sentence for a sex offence against the same
woman a year earlier. The report by the official healthcare watchdog into
conditions at units run by the Sutton and Merton primary care trust also reveals
that inspectors found another woman resident "for many years" had her arm tied
to a splint for most of the day, apparently to prevent her putting her hand in
her mouth and developing sores. The investigation found people with learning
disabilities living at Orchard Hill hospital in Carshalton, south London, and
other units run by the trust had been treated in outdated and infantilising
ways. Living conditions were impoverished, routines arranged for the convenience
of staff and organised activities at the hospital provided for less than five
hours a week. The commission's findings follow its report last summer on abuse
of learning disabled people in services run by the
Cornwall Partnership NHS trust. David Brindle
Wednesday January 17, 2007 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
Bleak house. A damning report into one of the last long-stay hospitals
for learning disabled people could be the final nail in the coffin for NHS
involvement in the service. When we sit down to eat, most of us do not have a
large sheet of blue tissue paper wrapped around our shoulders as an outsized
bib. Yet when healthcare inspectors came calling, staff at Orchard Hill hospital
in Carshalton, south
London, had no compunction about being seen to do this to some of the
disabled adults they were caring for - and then to feed them "at a speed that
would not allow for any enjoyment of the food". The episode encapsulates what
the inspectors uncovered at Orchard Hill - which will shortly be the last
remaining long-stay hospital in England for people with learning disabilities -
and at other facilities run by the learning disability service of Sutton and
Merton primary care trust (PCT). Institutional abuse was found to be prevalent
in most parts of the service, but it was abuse largely of an unthinking kind,
practised by staff who knew no better. "The overall model of care ... promoted
dependency," the inspectors conclude in their inquiry report, published today.
"The culture was such that staff concentrated on what people could not do,
rather than what they might be able to do." By David Brindle
Wednesday January 17, 2007 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS boss shock
resignation: MPs predict 'slashing cuts'. The chairman of
Epsom and St Helier
NHS Hospitals Trust has announced his resignation, leaving the crumbling
healthcare provider in "total crisis". News of Michael Doherty's departure -
which comes just weeks after the sudden exit of its chief executive Lorraine
Clifton - has led to increased fears that more cuts to health services are on
the way. Sutton and Cheam MP Paul Burstow said: "To lose one NHS boss may seem a
misfortune, to lose another NHS boss so soon looks more like a crisis. Staff
morale at St Helier must be in free fall. Frontline staff - already concerned
for their future after the trust announced that 470 jobs would go - now see the
trust's senior managers departing on an almost weekly basis. Staff cannot be
blamed for wondering just what sort of ship they are working on." Head of
Campaigns at London Health Emergency Geoff Martin added: "Epsom and St Helier is
a Trust in total crisis. It's a scandal that it's been allowed to descend into
this level of chaos and clearly the strings are being pulled right at the top.
We can now expect a wave of slash-and-burn panic cuts over the coming months
with severe consequences for staff and patients."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Sutton
Guardian 19 January 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Campaign groups combine to fight NHS cost-cutting. Two campaign groups
are uniting against NHS cuts and privatisation after a national conference. Last
weekend in Euston,
London, 30 branches of the Keep Our NHS Public campaign from across the
country voiced concerns over the effects the private sector will have on
hospitals and services. Now the Greenwich branch of Keep Our NHS Public is to
work with Bexley's Who Cares campaign to protest against proposed healthcare
changes in their areas. These include the Department of Health's (DoH) proposal
to create two independent treatment centres at Queen Mary's Hospital, Sidcup,
and St George's Hospital, Tooting. The centres will be run by private company,
Clinicenta, and will be supported by 10 community clinics, offering outpatient
and minor procedure services in Bromley, Woolwich and Croydon. They are part of
the second phase of the DoH's £3.75bn treatment centre programme. But the Keep
Our NHS Public campaign believes it will further destabilise hospitals, such as
Queen Mary's and Woolwich's Queen Elizabeth Hospital, because it will divert
money from the NHS to profit-making firms. Members of the Who Cares campaign,
run by manufacturing union Amicus, are also protesting against cuts in primary
care services. They include cutting district nursing hours from 15 to 12 hours a
day by cutting the twilight service and the scrapping of personal, social,
health and education nurses from primary schools. Nurses will be replaced by
normal teaching staff as part of the new sexual health service being implemented
by the end of March. The group organised a public meeting last month which
gained the support of Erith and Thamesmead MP John Austin. Bexley Who Cares
campaigner Caroline Riddell said: "We are fed up with the lack of consultation
and failure to listen to users of the service. We look forward to working with
the Greenwich branch and launching some kind of regional campaign to save our
NHS." Keep Our NHS Public chairman Frances Hook added: "I am excited to work
with Bexley. It will make our campaign much stronger and we hope to work with
the Lewisham group too. It's better to work together to stop the fragmentation
and privatisation of the NHS." A Lewisham Keep Our NHS Public Campaign meeting
will take place at 7.30pm on February 7 at the Civic Suite, Catford.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of News
Shopper 24 January 2007 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
MP's solution to
hospital row. The Liberal Democrats have come up with a "five-point
prescription plan" for
Hornsey Central Hospital. Lynne Featherstone, Liberal Democrat MP for
Hornsey and Wood Green, called for more GPs and clinic sessions for the hospital
as well as better consultation with residents and small local pharmacies which
may suffer if the hospital sets up its own large-scale "community pharmacy". She
also called for better transport links and a halt to the selling of land on the
site. Ms Featherstone said: "Like everyone else I want to see more money being
invested in local health services. But it is vital that Haringey Primary Care
Trust consults with local people and health professionals to get the project
right. The development needs to expand health provision in Haringey - not just
recycle the surgeries and clinics we already have in the area." A delegation of
women, some in their 90s, is to present a petition to 10 Downing Street to
protest against what they see as the neglect of the site in Park Road, the
neglect of older people's services in Haringey and the poor level of
consultation carried out by borough health bosses. Campaigners are also upset at
the private-public partnership plans which will see private firm Elevate lease
back a new building on the site to the NHS once it is built. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Hackney Gazette
25 January 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Hewitt rejects
council's block on closure of mental health clinic. Health secretary
Patricia Hewitt has overruled objections from local councils and agreed to the
closure of a south London emergency clinic for people with mental health
problems. Lambeth and
Southwark councils referred the matter to the secretary of state when they
did not agree with local NHS proposals to reconfigure mental health crisis
services. South London and Maudsley foundation trust's proposals included
closing the emergency clinic at the Maudsley Hospital. The clinic is the only
24-hour self-referral service of its kind in the UK and has been open since the
1950s. Lambeth and Southwark councils formed a joint health scrutiny committee
which concluded that the changes were not in the interests of the local health
service and that the matter could not be resolved locally. But in a letter to
the committee, Ms Hewitt said that closing the clinic was 'in line with the
mental health national service framework and other departmental policy, and
therefore in the interests of the local health service'. Committee chair Angie
Meader said: 'I think she's been very selective in the points we've raised that
she's responded to. She's not looking at the whole - she's just looking at the
words on paper rather than the reality of patients. When you lose one thing, it
doesn't mean other things get better. It just means services are diminished.'
Lambeth council's legal department will now 'read the small print of the Local
Government Act' to see if there are any future areas of action.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health Service Journal
25 January 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
PCTs fight UCLH over
data validity. Three primary care trusts are disputing the validity of a
massive increase in activity at a flagship
London hospital.
Camden, Westminster and Islington PCTs are working together to challenge
increases in activity at University College London Hospitals foundation trust.
Camden and Islington have both withheld payment to the value of queried activity
for the first three months of the financial year. The information was contained
in the PCTs' commissioning performance reports from their last meetings in
November. It has been confirmed that the problems have not been resolved.
Islington's November board papers state: 'The over-performance at UCLH continues
to grow at the same rate and is therefore the most significant risk to the PCT,
and the biggest single obstacle to achieving financial balance in 2006-07.' The
paper says UCLH is showing an 'over-performance of £1.5m' compared with PCT
forecasts, and that 'strong challenges have been made to the validity of much of
the increase in activity'. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health Service Journal
25 January 2007 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
MPs lambast £900m PFI hospital fiasco. Report urges rethink on
NHS building programme. Scheme abandoned after £15m and five years' work.
The government will be urged today to rethink its controversial NHS building
programme with the publication of a report which makes sweeping criticisms of
the disastrous attempt to build a super-hospital in London. A watchdog group of
MPs says the collapse of the £900m scheme in
Paddington Basin was
the result of incompetence, appalling planning, local staff who floundered and
were out of their depth, and a lack of clarity from the Department of Health.
The Commons public accounts committee says there are many lessons to be learned
from the cancellation in June 2006 of plans to merge and renew three out-of-date
hospitals, St Mary's, Harefield and the Royal Brompton, after five years and
£15m had been spent on failed attempts to put together a robust business case.
Its report criticises amateurish efforts from local NHS officials who were out
of their depth and a failure on the part of the government to engage. It calls
on the Department of Health to abandon its hands-off approach to private finance
initiative schemes in favour of much more involvement and control. Sarah
Boseley, health editor
Tuesday
January 30, 2007 The Guardian
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
MPs want greater
scrutiny of PFI hospitals to prevent waste. Private Finance Initiative built
hospitals should face "closer and sustained scrutiny" to avoid wasting further
millions of pounds, according to the public accounts committee. Estimated
capital costs for 17 PFI schemes approved by the end of 2005 have more than
doubled - up by some £4bn - to £13bn. The Department of Health blamed the rising
bill on inflation in the construction industry, the need for more single rooms
and expansion of planned services. However the committee's chairman, Edward
Leigh said the department "must crack down" on the cost of schemes. His comments
came as the committee published a report into the plan to build a £900m PFI
project in Paddington,
London that cost £15m before being scrapped. A review of big PFI hospital
projects is under way with the capital programme set to be scaled back from
£13bn to about £7bn-£9bn. The Department of Health claimed that this review
would provide the additional oversight the committee wanted. However the
committee said that it "remains to be seen" if the review will enable the
department to "get a grip" on the programme. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Financial
Times 30 January 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Health trust may hand
over most roles to companies. Hillingdon primary care trust in
London may become
the first to hand over almost all its core functions to the private sector,
including the commissioning of millions of pounds of care for National Health
Service patients. The move, which is likely to provoke bitter opposition from
the health service unions, would see the private sector taking over not just the
provision of community services but the assessment, planning, contracting,
procurement and performance management of £258m a year's worth of health care
for its local population. The primary care trust would retain a few core
functions, including patient and public involvement, emergency planning and the
handling of contracts. The move would be a big step towards the government's
goal of turning the NHS primarily into a commissioning organisation. Provision
in future will come from a mix of foundation hospitals, the private and
voluntary sectors and social enterprise, but with the independent sector able to
take part in the commissioning of care as well as its provision. The trust has
insisted the proposal is only one of a number of options that would be put to
the board in April. Anthony Sumara, Hillingdon PCT's interim chief executive who
was brought in to troubleshoot one of the NHS's worst financial problems in
London, was not available for comment yesterday. But he told the Health Service
Journal that essentially, "I want to get rid of everything - outsource it". The
trust would not be giving up responsibility because it would remain the
statutory body, responsible for the outcome of the contracts. It would reduce
staff numbers from about 300 to about 30, he said. Hillingdon has an accumulated
deficit of £54m on its £258m turnover and has been projecting a further £11m
deficit this year. According to papers put to the board last week, "outsourcing
the majority of commissioning functions . . . gives the greatest probability of
success" in turning that round. He acknowledges, however, that having to pay off
£54m in debt will make it difficult to draw up a contract from which private
companies could make a profit, and that Hillingdon on its own may be too small
to attract private providers big enough to take financial risk on the deal. The
NHS is negotiating a framework contract with big UK and US health providers that
would allow primary care trusts to access anything from help with number
crunching to the sort of "end-to-end" commissioning service that Hillingdon is
examining. Nigel Edwards, director of policy for the NHS Confederation, said a
number of PCTs were considering enlisting private sector help with
commissioning. "But I am not aware of anywhere else considering anything
remotely this radical." With NHS commissioning in its infancy, drawing up such a
contract would be "quite a challenge", he warned. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Financial
Times 2 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
PCT could slash 90
per cent of staff. A troubleshooter chief executive plans to strip an ailing
primary care trust down to its core functions and reduce the number of staff
from 300 to 30. Anthony Sumara, who has been interim chief executive of
Hillingdon PCT since
October, proposes to put three out of four commissioning support services out to
tender, and to hand clinical services to a new provider. Under the proposals,
the PCT would retain only its core functions like governance and emergency
planning, as well as patient and public involvement. The move could see the PCT,
which has £54m of historic debt, and is predicting an in-year deficit of £11m,
reduced from a staff of '300 to 30', he said. But he said the chances of the
board agreeing to the move were 50:50. The Proposal to Procure commissioning
strategic outline case was published by the PCT on January 23. It states:
'Outsourcing the majority of the PCT commissioning functions gives the greatest
benefit and the greatest probability of success,' when compared with three other
options: doing nothing, building internal capability and developing synergies
with other organisations. If the project gets approval in June the contracts
will go out to tender. Mr Sumara told HSJ: 'I want to get rid of everything,
outsource it - and we are distancing the PCT from its provider functions.' The
government's commissioning framework allows PCTs to choose which areas they wish
to outsource. The DoH is expected to publish its list of recommended
commissioning experts within weeks. Hillingdon is looking at three of the four
main categories identified in the framework: assessment and planning;
contracting and procurement; and performance management to ensure better
accountability. The organisation is currently working on defining what residual
functions a PCT should hold. Mr Sumara said responsibility for monthly emergency
planning, managing the outsourcing, governance of money, accountability and
development of the market would remain with the PCT. 'You need a PCT because you
need a statutory body to receive the money from government. We are also deciding
what will happen to the provider side - should it come under the hospital or
become a social enterprise ? We will
keep public-patient engagement as we have a better idea on how to engage with
the public locally and the voluntary sector than, say, [information analysts] Dr
Foster,' he said. 'The PCT is not giving up responsibility. We are doing this as
part of our recovery and to get some clarity around what a PCT should be doing.
It's commercialising, not privatising and the public don't care - it's not about
the provider services, it's about men in grey suits. It will still be free at
the point of access.' The next step is to develop the outline business case for
consideration by the board in April 2007 and appoint a dedicated project team.
The strategic outline case states: 'Hillingdon PCT commissioning is currently
weak and not fit for purpose. For example, acute providers will continue to
over-perform by £9.8m in 2006-07, adding to the historic debt.' Mr Sumara said:
'At the moment it is 50:50 whether it will be approved but I do think it will
save us money and I do think it will get the go-ahead. I don't think we are big
enough for some companies but they will start with us with a view to providing a
service across London.' Some of the risk factors considered in the proposals
include: the supplier's set-up costs exceeding the potential gains of the
contract; the delivery of financial balance for the PCT taking longer than
currently planned; the requirement to repay the historic debt making the
contract unattractive to outsourced suppliers; and an adverse reaction from the
public. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 2 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Questions over
Hewitt's role in privatised NHS plan. The Keep Our NHS Public campaign is
calling on Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt to stand by her word and call a halt
to plans to allow private companies to take over the functions of NHS primary
care trusts (PCTs). In a letter to the Guardian on 1st July 2006, following a
media storm over a 'stealth plan' to allow private companies to take over the
commissioning role of PCTs, Patricia Hewitt wrote: "Primary care trusts are and
will remain public statutory bodies responsible for using their growing budgets
to commission the best possible services for local people. They can never
outsource this responsibility, or ask others to make these decisions for them."
It has now emerged that
Hillingdon PCT in London has proposed to do exactly that - to hand over
almost all of its core functions to the private sector, including the
commissioning of care for patients worth millions of pounds, and the provision
of community services. The trust's chief executive, Anthony Sumara, said: "I
want to get rid of everything, outsource it". This clearly goes far further than
Hewitt indicated in her Guardian letter, when she played down the issue by
saying that the government merely wanted to make it easier for PCTs to "buy in
some management and support services, including the detailed data analysis that
helps to underpin sound commissioning". The story first came to light in June
2006, when Keep Our NHS Public alerted the press to an advertisement placed by
the Department of Health in the Official Journal of the European Union, inviting
companies to bid for the chance to spend substantial chunks of the NHS budget.
Following front-page headlines of 'Stealth plan to privatise NHS care' (The
Times) and '£64bn NHS privatisation plan revealed' (The Guardian), the
government withdrew the advertisement, saying that drafting errors had given the
"false impression" that clinical services provided by PCTs would be phased out
in favour of the private sector. But the advertisement was resubmitted two weeks
later and now Hillingdon PCT plans to use the scheme to outsource its clinical
services. This is despite the fact that Patricia Hewitt wrote in her letter to
the Guardian: "Most PCTs also employ district nurses, health visitors and many
other frontline staff who provide vital clinical services. They are not affected
in any way." Alex Nunns of Keep Our NHS Public said: "This blows the lid on the
government's plan to privatise the NHS by stealth. When this scheme was first
uncovered Patricia Hewitt rushed to deny that the story was true. Now our worst
fears are coming to pass. This is the patchwork privatisation of the NHS." Keep
Our NHS Public recently released a report, The patchwork privatisation of our
health service: a users' guide, which identified the outsourcing of PCT
commissioning and care as one of the key threats to the NHS. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Medical
News Today 2 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
NHS volunteers 'not
about cuts'. An NHS trust in Surrey
says a hospital volunteer scheme which will see people helping to feed patients
is not a cost-cutting exercise. Members of the Epsom and Ewell branch of Age
Concern have adopted the Roseberry Ward at
Epsom Hospital. It means trained
volunteers can provide a "befriending service" and help with feeding. Health
campaigners said they hoped it would not lead to staff cuts. Dr John Lister,
from the pressure group Health Emergency, said he could "understand why
public-spirited people want to help their local hospital", but he hoped their
"good intentions and goodwill" would not be used to save money.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of BBC
Online 3 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
4 |
|
Fears over NHS
rationing. Cancerous skin conditions may be the first victim of a new list
of low priority treatments banning GPs from referring some patients to hospital
specialists. Patients groups and doctors fear those needing varicose vein or or
a specialist opinion on asthma or skin conditions could have to pay for their
own treatments at private hospitals when the plans come into force. GPs will be
overruled if they refer patients that fall under the new low priority list to
hospital specialists.
Camden PCT revealed the list at a board meeting. The list includes: asthma,
grommet surgery, carpel tunnel surgery, minor skin surgery, various cosmetic
surgery, gender reassignment surgery, viral warts, eczema, acne and psoriasis.
The list includes: asthma, grommet surgery, carpel tunnel surgery, minor skin
surgery, various cosmetic surgery, gender reassignment surgery, viral warts,
eczema, acne and psoriasis. Dr Jacky Davis, founder member of the Keep our NHS
Public Campaign, said: "It's the thin end of the wedge. It looks like a huge
amount of bureaucracy. It's the beginning of a very explicit rationing. While
some of it may be appropriate who knows where it will end
?" She added: "It's going to be much more difficult to get a specialist
opinion for any of these things. It used to be that if a GP thinks you deserve a
second opinion they just referred you, now they have to jump through all these
hoops. If your GP can't argue your case strongly enough you could end up having
to go private." Last week the New Journal revealed how the Royal Homeopathic
hosptial in Bloomsbury is under threat because of the new rules. Cosmetic
surgery, including treatment for alopecia (hair loss) and correction of some
facial deformities, are deemed inappropriate for NHS provision. Under the new
plans, GPs will have to justify all referral decisions to a panel and if
unsuccessful, patients will have to either see a nurse or GP with specialist
knowledge in their condition. Patients unhappy with this may turn to private
medicine to get a second opinion. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Camden
New Journal 5 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
All those who wish to
see NHS remain a public service will oppose Hillingdon health trust's plan.
Dr Peter Fisher, President of the NHS Consultants' Association, writes in a
letter to the Financial Times: "If
Hillingdon primary
care trust hands over the bulk of its work, including commissioning, to the
private sector there would be bitter opposition not just from the unions but
from all those who wish to see the National Health Service remain a public
service, not become a commercial market. It would also demonstrate the total
incoherence of current health policy. After the expense of setting up and then
reconfiguring PCTs they would become a mere shell, without significant function.
What would happen to the much vaunted practice-based commissioning, or has it
already been decided to scrap that ?
Perhaps it indicates that despite all the inducements, referral management
centres and the like, independent sector treatment centres are still under-used
and can only be kept afloat by giving the private sector total control of the
commissioning process." Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Financial
Times 5 February 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Surgery slashed to
claw back cash. The amount of elective surgery in hospitals will be reduced
by 6% next year under Kingston Primary Care Trust's plans to balance its books.
Healthcare bosses have drawn up a plan to claw back £12m of debt next year, and
cutting non-essential surgery in hospitals will help them do it. But they admit
they have no idea how to deal with the rest of the £22.5m debt they expect to
have incurred by April. Kingston Primary Care Trust (PCT), which pays for
healthcare commissioning for Kingston's patients, has run up the debt over a
number of years. This financial year to April it will overspend its budget by
£11.9m, due in part to a £4m overspend by hospitals on patient treatment
compared to agreed levels of care. The PCT hopes to record a surplus of £300,000
and that will leave only a historic debt of £10m. Bosses hope
NHS London will
allow that to be set aside for now.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Wimbledon
Guardian 5 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Privatisation is at the root of the crisis. Up to 90 percent of workers at
the Hillingdon Primary Care Trust in north west
London could be
slashed due to the privatisation of the NHS. "I want to get rid of everything,
outsource it," trust boss Anthony Sumara told the Health Service Journal. The
"outsourcing" will mean that NHS workers - including district nurses, health
visitors and community health visitors - will find themselves working for
private companies. "Our worst fears are coming true," said Alex Nunns of the
Keep Our NHS Public campaign group and author of a new pamphlet on privatisation
in the NHS. "What is happening at Hillingdon is a major escalation of
privatisation. It's part of the government's plan to turn the NHS into a giant
health insurance company. This new privatisation will mean that in Hillingdon
private companies are buying health services for the NHS and selling them too -
and now they are getting control of the budget. The ultimate goal for a private
company is to make profits for its shareholders. It certainly isn't the
wellbeing of the patients or the staff. The government is trying to disguise
what is going on. It knows that most people don't want their health service
privatised so it uses language and terms that most people, including many health
professionals, don't understand. That is why Keep Our NHS Public has produced a
pamphlet that explains what is happening. We wanted to alert people to the fact
that there are dozens of schemes, which form a plan to get rid of the NHS. It
will be turned into nothing but a logo. If your MP says that the local hospital
is closing because of poor accounting or management, it is important to know how
the market in healthcare has been the basis of the funding crisis and how the
present government's policies have made matters worse." The "Patchwork
Privatisation" Of Our Health Service: A Users' Guide is available from Keep Our
NHS Public, c/ o NHS Support
Federation, Community Base, 113 Queen's Road, Brighton BN1 3XG. Price £1 or ten
for £5. Cheques payable to Keep Our NHS Public.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Socialist
Worker 7 February 2007
|
| |
|
|
|
|
3
March is a day to fight for NHS. The trade union day of action for the
health service needs to be a focus for the anger of health workers and local
campaigners fighting privatisation and cuts in the NHS. There is hardly an area
of Britain that is not suffering the prospect of savage cuts to local health
provision. In towns and cities there are protest rallies, marches and campaign
meetings to save local hospitals and facilities. The need to provide a national
focus for this anger and bring workers together with local campaigners could not
be greater. The number of local and regional protests planned for 3 March is
growing. Already the TUC's NHS Together campaign website (details below) lists
22 events outside the London area. Campaigners in
London are also
planning action in many parts of the city. A sign of the strength of feeling
over health cuts could be seen in Waltham Forest, north east London, last
Saturday where up to 2,000 people joined a demonstration against the downgrading
of Whipps Cross hospital. Gillian Muir from the Waltham Forest Carers
Association joined the march. She said: "They want to move many services
provided at Whipps to the new Queen's hospital miles away in Romford. But they
cannot tell us how older people, like the ones I represent, will be able to get
there. I'm angry at the health authority making these proposals but I'm more
angry at the government and I feel betrayed by it. Now they are telling us that
maybe they won't move everything at Whipps but instead they will downgrade King
George's hospital down the road in Redbridge. That is no answer, it will just
put more pressure on the hospitals that remain."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Socialist
Worker 7 February 2007
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Maternity crisis:
ministers who won't toe line. At least a dozen members of the Government
are fighting NHS closures of maternity units, A&
E departments, wards and cottage hospitals in or near their
constituencies. Among the most prominent are Hazel Blears (Salford),
the party chairman and a former health minister, and Ivan Lewis (Bury
South), a junior health minister in charge of maternity services. He opposes
the closure of the maternity unit at Fairfield Hospital, Bury, and was
absent yesterday at the launch of the report on the future of maternity
services in England, written by the maternity and child tsar, Dr Sheila
Shribman. She had to strive alone to answer questions from journalists on
the closures. Miss Blears has been on the picket line protesting over the
closure of maternity services at the Hope Hospital, and Jacqui Smith (Redditch),
the chief whip, has campaigned against the closure of maternity services at
the Alexandra Hospital in the town. Two parliamentary private secretaries
(PPS) have also been involved in protests. Kitty Ussher (Burnley),
a former special adviser to Patricia Hewitt, the Health Secretary, led a
campaign last year to save her local A&
E department. Mary Creagh (Wakefield),
the PPS to Andy Burnham, another health minister, has campaigned vigorously
against the loss of maternity services at Huddersfield Royal Infirmary. Mike
O'Brien (Warwickshire North), the solicitor general, has challenged
proposals to close a special-care baby unit at George Eliot Hospital in
Nuneaton, and Derek Twigg (Halton),
a defence minister, is concerned about ward closures at Halton Hospital,
Runcorn. Joan Ryan (Enfield
North), the immigration minister, backs the fight to for children's services
at Chase Farm Hospital. James Plaskitt (Warwick
& Leamington), the work and
pensions minister, wants to save the full range of services at Warwick
Hospital. Tessa Jowell (Dulwich &
West Norwood), the Culture Secretary, and Harriet Harman (Camberwell
& Peckham), the constitutional
affairs minister, oppose the closure of a 24-hour emergency clinic at the
Maudsley Hospital, south London.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Telegraph
7 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Ministers protest
over NHS cutbacks. Two senior ministers are lobbying Patricia Hewitt in
protest against NHS cuts in their constituencies. Tessa Jowell and Harriet
Harman have become the latest high-profile figures to campaign against the
Government's health plans by appealing to the Health Secretary over closures at
the Maudsley Hospital, south
London. They have
also written to the chief executive of their local NHS trust to ask him to save
the emergency clinic and day centre for the elderly at the hospital's mental
health unit, which are set to close as part of a plan to save £8m. Miss Harman,
the justice minister, said: "I am determined that whatever happens there must be
a separate distinct emergency unit for those with mental health problems to go
to at any time of day or night." Miss Jowell, the Culture Secretary, and Miss
Harman have justified breaking ranks by claiming that it was their duty as MPs
to save services in their constituencies.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Telegraph
10 February 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Health reforms cause
financial disarray at top eye hospital. An NHS hospital with an
international reputation for medical excellence has been thrown into
financial disarray by the government's
health service reforms. After
overspending by about £900,000 in the first half of the year, Moorfields eye
hospital in London
got a risk alert from the regulator and had its borrowing limits halved. The
hospital is recognised as one of the world's premier centres of ophthalmic
expertise. Last week it opened a new children's complex, the largest in the
world for paediatric eye care. John Carvel, social affairs editor
Monday
February 12, 2007 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
Faulty software puts
child health at risk. The health of children is at risk because an NHS
computer system wrecked 20 years of accurate immunisation records. Faulty
software introduced in 2005 has left some primary care trusts (PCTs) unable to
track whether children have been vaccinated and screened for genetic conditions,
raising fears that many are unprotected against diseases. Parents are not being
reminded when their children are due for jabs and check-ups. The Health
Protection Agency cannot publish full statistics on the uptake of vaccines
because the five worst-affected
London trusts cannot
provide accurate data. When the shortcomings of the Child Health Interim
Application (CHIA) software were disclosed by The Times a year ago, the
Department of Health stated that the problems were being addressed. But staff
are said to be "in despair" at continuing difficulties with the system supplied
by BT.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Times
13 February 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
This is how NHS cash
crisis is biting. Cash-strapped hospitals have been ordered to remove light
bulbs in a desperate bid to save money. Secretaries may also be drafted in to
weigh babies at one NHS trust, while newly-qualified nurses are so desperate for
a job they are reportedly working for free or below the minimum wage. In another
sign of the NHS financial crisis, it emerged that some hospitals are saving
money by not paying bills for healthcare supplies. Ray Hodgkinson, the director
general of the British Healthcare Trades Association which represents 400
medical supply firms, said: "I have been in this industry since 1960 and this is
probably the worst it has ever been. It's very, very worrying." Within the past
two weeks, the St Helier general hospital on the outskirts of
London and the Epsom
district hospital, in Surrey, have been removing light bulbs to help cut a £3
million annual electricity bill. The Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals
NHS Trust said: "We can confirm that maintenance staff have removed some light
bulbs from the main corridors and some communal areas in the trust, as part of
our financial recovery plan." A spokesman defended the move, saying "no clinical
areas" - such as operating theatres and wards - were affected. She admitted the
savings would only be a tiny part of cost savings, with plans to discharge
patients earlier and improve operating theatre "productivity" likely to yield
much more. But Tom Brake, the Liberal Democrat MP for Carshalton and Wallington,
said: "This is bonkers. You could not make this up." It also emerged that the
Bexley Care Trust in Kent, which wants to save £12.3 million this year, is
considering training up "a range of staff" to help with weighing babies. The
Amicus union expressed fears that the plan would involve secretaries. The
Community Practitioners and Health Visitors' Association warned that it could
leave a health visitor liable to court action or being struck off the Nursing
Midwifery Council register if something went wrong. The plan came to light as
the Royal College of Nursing raised the alarm over newly-qualified nurses having
to work for free or for below the minimum wage. The RCN said that the
Co Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust as well as the North Tees and
Hartlepool NHS Trust were offering "honorary" preceptorship contracts to some
nurses unable to secure other employment with them. The Co Durham scheme comes
with a training allowance of £480 - an estimated hourly rate of £2.60 compared
with the minimum wage of £4.45 for 18-to-21-year-olds and £5.35 for those aged
22 and over. There is no guarantee of a job at the end of the contract. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Telegraph
14 February 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Light bulb hospital
'is meanest'. St
Helier Hospital has been dubbed "the meanest in Britain" by NHS campaigners
after a number of measures including taking down light bulbs. Epsom and St
Helier NHS Trust needs to save £24m and defended the light bulb step as a
finance recovery move. However Health Emergency has claimed that management
consultants are still receiving a "fat fee" while staff morale is "rock bottom".
Geoff Martin, spokesman of the NHS pressure group Health Emergency, said: "St
Helier is the meanest hospital in Britain and is an example of everything that
is wrong in the NHS. Staff morale is at rock bottom and the trust is being run
by management consultants getting paid a fat fee for dreaming up the most
outrageous penny-pinching cuts." And Kevin O'Brien, spokesman for Unison, the
union which represents health workers, said: "Staff are furious at the way their
services are being ripped apart by wave after wave of cuts and threats of
redundancy." The trust is aiming to cut 480 posts and close 200 beds over 18
months under savings plans. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of BBC
Online 15 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
After Eden,
things look rosy in the social enterprise garden. So far, relatively few
social enterprises in the health and social care field have won contracts to
deliver NHS services, although there are a small number of fairly
well-established examples. South East
London Doctors
Co-operative, a non-profit-making limited company owned, managed and
financed by 460 GP members, provides out-of-hours services for around
900,000 patients in Lambeth, Lewisham and Southwark.
Sandwell Community Caring Trust is a charity that runs residential and
respite care and supported living programmes for people with physical and
learning disabilities in the West Midlands, and the Kath Locke Centre in
Manchester was the first NHS primary care facility in the country to be
run by a social enterprise. In September 2006, health secretary Patricia
Hewitt (who worked in the not-for-profit sector before becoming an MP, and
while trade and industry secretary established a new legal structure, the
'community interest company', to help such bodies) wrote a pamphlet setting
out why social enterprises should play a greater role in 'unleashing the
potential of staff within the NHS to deliver better services to patients'.
The community foundation trust model, currently under discussion by the
Department of Health and Monitor, could offer one means to redesign
services. Another approach, Ms Hewitt suggested, was to find ways to allow
the NHS to routinely contract with, or set up its own, social enterprises -
for example to deliver services organised around care pathways such as
stroke, diabetes or other long-term conditions, and perhaps to work in joint
ventures with charities and voluntary groups. Already there is no shortage
of social enterprises keen to enter the NHS market. In October the DoH's
social enterprise unit invited applications to become 'pathfinder' social
enterprise projects. It got more than 400 responses in six weeks. The 25
winners, announced at the January conference, will receive DoH backing up to
a total of £1m to help them develop NHS-commissioned provision ranging from
services for specific patient groups, like dementia patients, to wider
activities encompassing primary and community care across whole districts.
Ian Carmichael, a former primary care lead at South West strategic health
authority, is now on secondment to set up one of the pathfinder social
enterprises, the
Forest of Dean Health Enterprise Trust, which aims to take over the
running of two community hospitals and become an 'umbrella provider' for the
area's 80,000 population. He said: 'To make our ideas into reality we need
to employ a lot of staff, and we're going to need a way of giving them
access to NHS terms and conditions or it won't work. As a temporary
solution, secondment might be the answer but even that is fraught with
problems so this is certainly something that needs sorting out from the
centre.' At least one social enterprise - Central
Surrey Health - has managed to find a way of keeping its staff in the
NHS pension scheme while delivering services on a contractual basis, albeit
without having gone through a formal tendering process. The nurse and
therapist-led mutual limited company took over a three-year, £60m contract
to supply community services including speech and language therapy to East
Elmbridge and Mid-Surrey PCT in October 2006.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 15 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
4 |
|
Stopping needless
operations could save £100m, says London Health Observatory. Stopping
unnecessary operations could save
London's NHS almost
£100m, according to new research. The London Health Observatory has studied 34
selected procedures for which the clinical case is sometimes debatable, and
drawn up 'access criteria', which would sharply restrict their use. Its report
found 'significant and unexplained variation in planned surgical care in London
for procedures where there is evidence that service access criteria should be in
place'. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 15 February 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Turnaround specialist
recruited by London NHS.
London's strategic
health authority announced this week that Hillingdon Primary Care Trust interim
chief executive Anthony Sumara would take the role of turnaround director.
According to the latest figures, NHS organisations in London were forecasting
the second biggest aggregate deficit in England - £135m against a planned
deficit for this year of £90m. The biggest deficit was forecast by East of
England SHA (£151m). NHS London chief executive Ruth Carnall said Sumara's
experience in turning around the financial fortunes of NHS organisations would
be invaluable. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Public
Finance 16 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Nice dentists, shame about the quotas. If you want to understand the
muddle facing NHS dentistry across England, try paying a visit to a practice
near the Clem Attlee housing estate in Fulham, west
London. But don't
necessarily expect to get treatment after the end of this month. NHS Dentist, an
expanding practice on North End Road, is about to "overperform" on its contract
- so there will be no more public money available to treat further patients
until the new financial year. John Carvel
Wednesday February 21, 2007 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
Trusts may lose secure hospitals. Control of England's three
high-security hospitals could be removed from local NHS control. Broadmoor,
Rampton, and Ashworth hospitals could be controlled independently, in a
return to a policy that was scrapped due to a series of high-profile
scandals when they were managed separately by special hospital authorities.
The potential change emerged as the three mental health trusts that
currently run the hospitals were told by health secretary Patricia Hewitt
that they would not be given foundation status.
Mersey Care trust, which runs Ashworth Hospital,
Nottinghamshire
Healthcare trust, which runs Rampton, and West
London Mental
Health trust, which operates Broadmoor, have been told they cannot become
foundation trusts because Ms Hewitt does not want to relinquish control of
the hospitals.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 22 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Not in our back yard,
says health minister's hubby. Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt has been
drawn into a row over plans for a new 100-hours-a-week chemist in
Camden Town, which
will dispense syringes, after her husband raised an objection. William Birtles,
a senior crown court judge, has written to the Camden Primary Care Trust in
protest at chain chemist ABC Pharmacy's plans for a new shop. The letter stated:
"I write to oppose the opening of the new pharmacy at NW1. We have a serious
drug problem throughout Camden which is well-known by the local police. I don't
feel it's appropriate for a local pharmacy to do that (provide a needle
exchange)." The objection is potentially embarrassing for Ms Hewitt, as 100-hour
pharmacies were part of policies she introduced during her time as Trade and
Industry Minister. Also in his letter, Mr Birtles said that the 100-hours policy
was "something that needs to be looked at". Under Trust rules, a new chemist
cannot open in Camden Town unless it uses a special 100-hours application and
provides 'enhanced' services. Jagdish Vaghela and his wife Hansila, who run the
Biotech Chemist, could face stiff competition from the new pharmacy as it would
be located between their shop and the health centre. Mr Vaghela said the
100-hours system was allowing big businesses to bypass the rules and crowd out
neighbourhood pharmacies. The new service would be bound by contract rules to
stay open for 100 hours a week. Mr Vaghela said: "They will eat up the business
- they can make a loss while they are doing it because they are a
multinational." He added: "The PCT has received lots of objections." Hansila
Vaghela added: "People have got sidetracked. The issue is about what the
community in Camden want. They don't want a 100-hours chemist and needle
service."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Camden
New Journal 23 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Trust withholds quit
information. The
Epsom and St Helier NHS Hospitals Trust has refused to reveal how much its
former chief executive was paid to quit amid claims the sum topped £500,000.The
Sutton Guardian and the MP for Sutton and Cheam both lodged Freedom of
Information requests with the trust to discover the circumstances surrounding
Lorraine Clifton's sudden departure in December 2006. The trust witheld the
information on the grounds that it will be published in their annual report in
September. Paul Burstow MP has written to the trust to complain about the
decision, saying it is in the public interest for the information to be
released. Mr Burstow said: "It is clear from the information the trust has
disclosed that Ms Clifton did not leave voluntarily. In the light of this, and
the budget deficit which is set to force one in 10 hospital staff out of their
jobs, the public have a right to know how much she was paid to go." Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Sutton
Guardian 23 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Deciding the future
of Bolingbroke hospital's services. Wandsworth Council is to launch its own
consultation on the short-term future of services at
Bolingbroke
Hospital. The council claims the NHS survey does not give respondents a chance
to vote for services to be kept running at the hospital while its long-term
future is decided. The NHS consultation, arranged jointly by St George's
Healthcare NHS Trust and Wandsworth Primary Care Trust, gives people four
options on the short-term future of health services currently provided at the
hospital. However, none of these options offer the choice of retaining services
on the Bolingbroke site. The trusts will include the option of keeping the
Bolingbroke open when it launches a separate consultation in the summer on
long-term provision for the area. The four short-term options offered by health
chiefs include moving services to St John's, in Battersea, St George's, in
Tooting, or even moving some to Queen Mary's, in Roehampton. The council want to
add a fifth option of keeping services at Bolingbroke until long-term plans are
drawn up. Councillor Ian Hart said: "Less than three years ago, an NHS review
concluded the Bolingbroke was the best place to site a new local care hospital
for Battersea. We have seen nothing since then to persuade us the review team
got it wrong."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Wandsworth
Guardian 23 February 2007 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Hewitt approves seven PFI hospitals at cost of £1.5bn. Patricia
Hewitt, the health secretary, gave the green light yesterday to plans for
seven new hospitals to be built under the private finance initiative at a
cost of £1.5bn. Her decision to back the NHS's biggest ever tranche of
investment will provide modern facilities for patients in
Bristol,
Peterborough,
Middlesbrough,
Wakefield,
Tunbridge
Wells,
Chelmsford and
Edmonton, north London. But it added to anxieties among health service
managers and union leaders that the NHS is locking itself into repaying huge
sums in 30-year deals with the private sector for buildings and equipment
that may not meet changing medical needs. John Carvel, social affairs editor
Tuesday February 27, 2007 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
'We've got to live in
the real world'.
Enfield's health boss has said that an irrational fear of change is behind
opposition to cuts at Chase Farm Hospital. Sally Johnson, Chief Executive of
Enfield Primary Care Trust (PCT) said: "No change to services at Chase Farm is
not realistic." Ms Johnson was speaking ahead of next month's march against the
reconfiguration programme. Opponents claim that change is being foisted upon
Enfield's health care services and fear the community's needs have not been
considered. Ms Johnson admitted that the case for change is grounded in national
policy, and was adamant that borough health services must fit in with the
recommendations of Government. Government expert, professor Sir George Alberti,
national director for emergency access, is currently analysing the five options
on the table for the future of the medical centre at the Ridgeway. Four propose
that women and children's services be axed, while three advocate the closure of
the casualty department. A recently added fifth stipulates no change at all. Ms
Johnson dashed the hopes of opponents who believed Sir George might halt the
scheme. However, she maintained that Enfield's population is insufficient to
sustain a casualty department at Chase Farm, but conceded that changes would hit
some residents. To counter the impact of cuts, Ms Johnson pledged to give the
ambulance service as much cash as it needed to handle extra demand. She also
announced a £6m investment programme in GP surgeries, but was unable to say
where they would be located. The Save Chase Farm group has called on residents
to march against closures on March 3. Organisers hope it will be the biggest
display of dissent in Enfield's history.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Enfield
Independent 27 February 2007 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Seven more PFI
hospitals to go ahead. Seven more private finance initiative hospitals, with
a capital value of almost £1.5bn, were finally given the go-ahead but amid
growing frustration among PFI providers at the time it is taking for the
Department of Health to adjust hospital building plans to the new, more
competitive, NHS market. The hospital PFI programme is being cut back from an
original £12bn of additional schemes to something closer to £7bn-£9bn, according
to the health department, as hospitals adjust to the uncertainty of a system
that pays them for each patient they treat, in contrast to block contracts. The
announcements in part reflect that. The value of the seven schemes given the
go-ahead is being reduced by about 15 per cent, or by £248m on their original
£1.63bn value. But although the go-aheads - for schemes at various stages of
procurement - has now been given the first stage of the review was meant to be
completed by late last year. And a reappraisal of 23 other schemes with a
capital value of about £5.5bn, including some individual projects worth £500m
and more, is unlikely to be completed before the autumn, the health department
said - the better part of two years since the review of PFI projects was
launched. To date, only a few PFI projects - the £1bn
Paddington campus
scheme, Whipps Cross and
Essex Rivers - have been withdrawn. Three of yesterday's approvals -
Peterborough, a rebuild in North
Bristol, and a smaller project in the
north-east, went through unchanged. Two more have undergone relatively minor
revision. But the
Maidstone
deal has been cut back from a £269m scheme to £218m, while one in Mid-Essex is
down from £199m to £143m. Unison, the health service union, protested that
taxpayers will be "paying over the odds" for the new facilities for years to
come because they have been built through the PFI. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Financial
Times 27 February 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Calls for health cuts
protest. Health workers have urged people to protest against NHS cuts
outside Hackney Town
Hall this weekend. The protesters, who fear patient care is being damaged by a
series of cutbacks, will gather in Town Hall Square at twelve noon on Saturday
before marching to Homerton University Hospital, circling the hospital, and
returning to town hall to link up with protesters marching from the Royal London
Hospital in Whitechapel. The protest is being organised by the Homerton Anti
Cuts campaign and the joint trade union, Staff Side, and will coincide with the
national day of action called by health unions. "The combination of cuts and
privatisation across the country is putting the NHS in jeopardy and we urge
everyone to make a stand," said Unison member, Diana Swingler. Health bosses
argue the reorganisation will improve efficiency without damaging patient care.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Hackney
Gazette 1 March 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
NHS
staff protest over job cuts. Health workers have been holding marches and
rallies to protest about cuts to NHS jobs and services, and below-inflation pay
increases. Demonstrations took place in a number of towns and cities, including
London,
Manchester,
Preston,
Bristol,
Birmingham,
Sheffield
and Belfast. TUC general secretary Brendan
Barber - who spoke in Sheffield - said there was "real concern" about NHS
policies. Barber said there were several problems within the NHS. "Obviously
there are immediate pressures with cuts and jobs disappearing, wards closing in
too many trusts," he said. "People not able to find jobs when they've completed
their training - nurses, physiotherapists. So all of those kinds of problems.
But (there is) a feeling that the direction of policy is just not right. The
privatisation, the fragmentation of the NHS is really threatening the whole
integrity of the service. I think that's what people are saying today." Dr Peter
Carter, of the Royal College of Nursing, said nurses were "angry and upset" over
a number of issues. "Over the last year or so nurses have seen jobs frozen,
redundancies, services closed, wards closed, student nurses not being able to
get jobs on finishing their training, which is a pretty depressing state of
affairs. And then you've had the announcement by the government that they were
not going to fully implement the recommendations of the pay review body that
nurses should get 2.5%. And so it's a combination of both of these things have
led to an extremely frustrated nursing workforce." Health Minister Rosie
Winterton said unions and staff signed up to the principles of the NHS Plan,
which sets out reforms over 10 years.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of BBC
Online 3 March 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Protestors take
to the streets over NHS cuts and closures. Thousands turned out last
weekend to protest at cuts, deficits, and increasing private sector
involvement in the NHS. The "Day of Action" was organised by NHS Together, a
collaboration of health service unions, NHS staff organisations, and the
Trades Union Congress. A series of events took place across the country. A
"Rock for the NHS" concert took the stage at
Woking, while in Crawley protestors marched in nightgowns and bandages.
Other rallies were held in Brighton,
Maidstone,
Gloucester,
Preston, Belfast,
London, and
Sunderland, where Dr George Rae, chairman of the BMA's northern regional
council (left) took part. In Tunbridge Wells, a small crowd protested at the
closure of the Homoeopathic Hospital. In
Birmingham, Unison general secretary Dave Prentis said the protests were
"testament to the growing number of people worried about the future of our
NHS." Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of British
Medical Journal 9 March 2007 |
| |
|
|
4 |
|
Trust scales back
many minor operations.
Croydon's Primary
Care Trust is slashing the number of minor operations it carries out in a bid to
save money and resources. Surgical procedures such as hysterectomies, grommet
installation and varicose vein treatments have been reduced by the PCT. New
criteria has been set out by the trust which mean treatment for complaints such
as tonsilitis will not be routinely available through GP referrals. Procedures
will still be offered to patients where evidence shows it would be "of benefit"
and the new arrangements - which have already been implemented - will not affect
people who need specialist care, a PCT spokesman said. Dr Tim Crayford, medical
director and director of public health at Croydon PCT, said: "It is, in part,
due to money but it is more about wasting money on treatments that will not be
beneficial to the patient. This does not mean it will be more difficult to get
referrals. Neither does it mean people will have to wait longer for referrals,
just that patients will be offered procedures if it will benefit them. If we
have two treatments which do the same thing but have different costs we should
be obligated to choose the cheaper one. We are, after all, a publicly-funded
body." Cosmetic surgery may only be offered if there is an adverse physical
side-effect to the complaint such as impaired vision, which could rule out birth
marks and other skin complaints where a patient may benefit emotionally or
mentally. Croydon PCT has reviewed its policy - called Clinically Effective
Commissioning - along with other trusts in south west London following guidance
from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Croydon
Guardian 9 March 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Breaking down costs identifies loss-making services. The
Eastman Dental Hospital
is piloting Monitor's profit and loss approach. Part of University College
London Hospitals, it has an international reputation. But it operates in an
ageing building and has been struggling financially for years. By breaking down
the costs of each type of service, it can identify which are trading at a loss
and which make money, says Professor David Fish, UCLH's medical director for
specialist hospitals. That was providing opportunities to increase activity in
areas that do make money, such as orthodontics. But it was throwing up areas
where the NHS was not paying enough to cover unavoidable treatment costs. That
would lead to conversations with the hospital's primary care trusts, and with
those who set the NHS tariff, in an attempt to secure more accurate prices and
payments.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Financial
Times 12 March 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Merger paves way for
health science centre. The first foundation trust that provides hospital
services, but is not part of the NHS, could be created following decisions by
two NHS trusts to merge with part of the University of
London. Hammersmith
Hospitals trust and St Mary's trust, both in west London, have formally decided
to merge, and then to create the UK's first academic health science centre with
Imperial College London. Once the new organisation is set up, scheduled for
autumn, the trusts have been given approval by NHS London to apply for
foundation status, with Imperial College London as the sponsor. The new trust
will aim to create a world-class centre for research and innovation, which would
also provide standard hospital services, in a similar model to some of the
best-performing US hospitals. But local NHS sources have expressed concern that
Imperial College London's involvement in the project could be a 'Trojan horse',
to develop cutting-edge research but at the expense of traditional acute
hospital services. They question whether the new centre would want to carry out
research into areas such as emergency care or care of the elderly, and suggest
that the merger could limit choice for primary care trusts. Professor Stephen
Smith, principal of the Imperial College London faculty of medicine, admitted
combining academic expertise with the strengths of Hammersmith and St Mary's
trusts would be a 'bold but critical challenge', but he said patients would
benefit. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 15 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
PCTs consider
alternative to homeopathic hospitals. One of England's four homeopathic
hospitals is at risk of closure because of primary care trusts' reluctance
to refer patients outside the NHS mainstream. Other homeopathic hospitals
are also facing severe financial problems.
Kent
PCT, which runs Tunbridge Wells Homeopathic Hospital and also refers the
majority of patients, is consulting on whether to vet all referrals made by
GPs to the hospital. As part of cost-cutting measures the PCT announced at
the end of last year, all referrals to the homeopathic hospital would be
scrutinised by an individual treatments panel, which would decide whether or
not the referral would go ahead. Campaigners claim this would have meant
many referrals being refused, and the subsequent slashing of resources could
have resulted in its closure. Following protests, Kent PCT has agreed to
review its commissioning process for treatment at the hospital, and a
decision is expected later in the spring. The Royal
London
Homeopathic Hospital is also experiencing a severe cut in funding, following
the cancellation of contracts by commissioning PCTs. Brent PCT has
terminated its contract with the Royal London, and Hammersmith and Fulham
PCT has 'signalled an intention to stop direct GP referrals'. It is
reviewing its position, but the PCT expects GPs will have to ask for
approval for any referral for homeopathic treatment. Other London PCTs are
also considering their position and look likely to reduce referrals. Royal
London Homeopathic Hospital clinical director Peter Fisher said: 'A
combination of bad press and financial turbulence in the NHS means we are
seen as a soft target. There is a collision here between PCTs' financial
imperative and the willingness to adhere to patient choice.' Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 15 March 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Doctors march in row over training reforms. Thousands of doctors marched
in London and
Glasgow yesterday in protest at reforms to medical
training. The new process, called Modernising Medical Careers (MMC), has come in
for widespread criticism from the BMA, royal colleges, senior medics and
trainees. At least 30,000 junior doctors have applied for up to 22,000
specialist posts under MMC, which it was hoped would speed up training and offer
a fairer way of placing junior doctors in oversubscribed training roles. The
government has already bowed to pressure, announcing that 5,000 more doctors
would now be interviewed. Amelia Hill
Sunday
March 18, 2007 The Observer |
| |
|
|
|
|
London chief defends
Corrigan and Warner's appointments. NHS
London's interim
chief executive has defended her new top team against claims they include
political appointments meant to push through New Labour reforms. Ruth
Carnall acknowledged that two appointments were always likely to be politicised,
namely former health minister Lord Warner as chair of the new London Provider
Development Agency, and Number 10 adviser Professor Paul Corrigan as the
strategic health authority's director of commissioning and strategy. Carnall
said: 'The notion that I have put in place a team with the aim of privatising
the NHS in London is nonsense.' Her comments came after shadow health secretary
Andrew Lansley wrote to senior officials at the Department of Health and to NHS
London expressing his concerns. Mr Lansley alleges Lord Warner's appointment
breaches the ministerial code of conduct and has written to permanent secretary
Hugh Taylor to demand answers to a series of questions about the appointments
process, its timing and whether permission has been sought. He argues that
Professor Corrigan's appointment, which comes on the eve of a major shake-up of
London health services, is 'deeply unwise' and should be abandoned. He said:
'These appointments of people who have been at the most senior level pushing the
proposals for the reconfiguration of hospitals are unacceptable. They undermine
the credibility and independence of the NHS in London for reaching its own view
about what is in the best interests of patients in the capital.' Unison also has
concerns about the appointments. London head of health Chris Remington said: 'I
think they will use London as a test bed. We will see the wholesale shifting of
staff into the private sector.' The new team in London includes: Ruth Carnall as
interim chief executive; Professor Paul Corrigan, Tony Blair's special adviser
on health and widely regarded as an architect of the current market reforms, as
director of strategy and commissioning; Lord Warner, former health minister, now
chair of London's Provider Development Agency where he will steer trusts towards
foundation status; Malcolm Stamp, PDA chief executive, who was one of the first
foundation chief executives; Paul Baumann, a finance director from Unilever, as
director of performance and finance; Antony Sumara, turnaround director, known
for his work in troubled trusts. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 22 March 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Mentally-ill
patients to be released early. Mental health patients will be released
into the community earlier in a raft of cuts aiming to save £8m, it has
emerged. Camden and
Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust (CIMH) is making sweeping
money-saving changes because it is facing rising costs and mounting
financial pressure from the NHS and Camden Primary Care Trust (PCT).
Following the closure of Jamestown Day Centre, Camden's mental health
patients are set to see the three-day hospitals Felix Brown, in the Royal
Free, West Hampstead in Fordwych Road, and Jules Thorn in St Pancras Way,
reduced to just two, with day places reduced from 85 to 65 and staff cut by
seven. Documents reveal plans to reduce the average length of stay from six
months to three and a half, despite fears patients may not be well enough.
Mental health chiefs are due to discuss the changes to the service. And the
cuts don't stop there. There are fears Mornington Ward, a Psychiatric
Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in St Pancras Hospital, is also facing the axe.
The trust plans to withdraw three remaining wards from St Luke's Hospital in
Muswell Hill prompting fears the hospital will have to close. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Camden
New Journal 23 March 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS crisis is
forcing cuts to maternity care, charity warns. Support for pregnant
women is being cut because of the NHS's financial troubles, a healthcare
charity has warned. The National Childbirth Trust (NCT) says it is receiving
"increasing reports" that NHS antenatal classes, breastfeeding services and
postnatal visits are being cancelled. NHS antenatal classes have been cut or
suspended in at least 10 areas in England and Wales, according to the NCT.
These are Romsey in
Hampshire;
Worcestershire; Newham in
London;
Watford; Gwent in south Wales; south-west
Kent;
Nottinghamshire;
Gloucestershire; Hemel Hempstead in Hertfordshire; and Wiltshire. The
NCT said it also understood that postnatal home visits have been stopped or
are facing cuts in Wiltshire and in east and north Hertfordshire, which
would mean new mothers have to travel to a clinic in order to receive
after-birth care. Press Association
Monday March 26, 2007 SocietyGuardian.co.uk
|
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
Hospital gives cheap
parking to football fans. A leading NHS hospital has sparked outrage by
charging football fans less to park than patients and their relatives.
Chelsea and Westminster
Hospital charges Chelsea fans attending matches at nearby Stamford Bridge
£10 for four hours. But patients receiving treatment in accident and emergency
and other departments are made to pay £12.50 to park for the same period. A
spokesman for Chelsea and Westminster Hospital said: "We actively promote the
car park to Chelsea fans attending games because they generate extra income that
can be reinvested in front-line patient care."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Telegraph
26 March 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Demise of 'double
deficit' prompts refunds to budgets as loans system is introduced. The
Department of Health is to scrap the 'double deficit' accounting system for
acute trusts and pay back deductions taken from them during 2006-07. The move
will see the Treasury's resource accounting and budgeting system abolished from
1 April, as well as several trusts receiving rebates that significantly reduce
their end-of-year deficits. Under the RAB system, introduced in 2001, trusts
that run up an in-year deficit are penalised by the same amount the following
year. Dismantling the system means that acute trusts that have been paying
deductions this year for overspends in 2005-06 will get the money back; however,
the DoH will not refund RAB deductions for previous years. A DoH spokeswoman
told HSJ that, where RAB cash had been deducted before 2006-07, NHS trusts would
have to 'agree with their auditors a "disregard" of RAB deductions for the
purpose of meeting the statutory break-even duty'. A total of 28 acute trusts
will benefit from the RAB rebate. The DoH has given back £178m to the trusts to
be distributed by strategic health authorities. North West London Hospitals
trust stands to gain the single biggest refund, getting around £24m and reducing
its current deficit from £25.6m to just over £1.5m.
London's Queen
Elizabeth Hospital trust gets a refund of just over £23m, cutting its debt from
£36m to £12.6m. Last July, the Audit Commission recommended trusts be reimbursed
for RAB deductions from 2001 and called for the system to be scrapped. Its
report, commissioned by health secretary Patricia Hewitt, said that RAB was
incompatible with the NHS financial regime. However, the DoH delayed the
decision to scrap it until it was confident that the NHS would balance its books
this year. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 29 March 2007 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Controversial critical care centre axed. Hospital managers have scrapped
plans for a £450m critical care centre and a network of community units across
south London on the
grounds of affordability. Plans had been bogged down in rows over cost and
location, with accusations that health secretary Patricia Hewitt was
'gerrymandering'. Ms Hewitt was alleged to have intervened to favour a site in a
Labour constituency. But last week the proposals were scrapped. Merton and
Sutton primary care trust chief executive Caroline Taylor, who chairs the
steering group of trusts and PCTs under the Better Healthcare Closer to Home
umbrella, said 'capital and revenue costs are now not affordable'. Local service
changes had reduced the projected number of patients that would use the new
unit. The centre's feasibility was further damaged when NHS London introduced a
£250m cap on capital spending. Now the consortium intends to revise plans for
community services and a smaller general hospital serving around 300,000. Geoff
Martin, head of campaigns at pressure group Health Emergency, said: 'Seven years
of reviews and consultations have cost us millions in wasted fees for management
consultants and planners and have got us nowhere. There is no site for a new
hospital, no money to build it and no-one held to account for this expensive
shambles. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 29 March 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
£8m
cut in health budget. Mental health chiefs have approved £8m cuts in the
run-up to becoming a foundation trust. The massive savings were voted through at
a meeting of Camden and
Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust board. The cuts will mean
closures of some acute wards and a day hospital. It is also planned to discharge
some patients early from residential care. Patrick Dalton, acting chairman of
Camden Mental Health Consortium, a patients' group, warned that the changes will
mean short hospital stays and staff cuts. Trust chief executive Wendy Wallace
defended the cuts, saying: "This is happening because, like all public sector
organisations, we have to break even and we'll have less money next year."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Camden
New Journal 30 March 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Free chief says more
to be sold. Royal Free chief executive Andrew Way has admitted th | |