|
The London Strategic Health Authority was formed by merging five old
strategic health authorities. This page has always covered the whole of
London.
This is the archive to 2006. For more recent material see:
London Strategic
Health Authority
The summary articles in the table below related to the strategic health
authority area are copied from the following pages, indicated in the table by
key numbers.
-
Charges
-
Construction projects
-
Resource shortfall Sources
-
Treatment approval or not
- Withdrawal of Local Facilities -
Sources
Other
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Summary articles |
| |
|
|
|
|
Long waits in casualty blot Whittington's good marks. Report found fault in
'privacy and dignity'. Guardian
Unlimited Friday January 25, 2002 |
| |
|
|
|
|
The writer, who has
asked not to be named, is an Australian operating theatre nurse who has
worked at nearly a dozen London hospitals, placed there on short-term
contracts through nursing agencies. Most of these hospitals are well-known
and in the state sector.
Guardian
Society
Thursday April 4, 2002 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Hospital trust 'failures' led to breast cancer errors. Society
Monday April 15, 2002 [Hammersmith Hospital] |
| |
|
|
|
|
Mix-up on cancer screening 'avoidable'. Sarah Boseley, health editor
Guardian
Tuesday April 16, 2002 |
| |
|
|
|
|
A casualty in need of intensive care. Shamed in the tables, Chase
Farm's patients remain loyal. Sarah Boseley, health editor Guardian
Tuesday April 23, 2002 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
NHS chiefs in Enfield are working on three huge private finance initiatives
(PFIs) that could make or break the local health service. John Carvel
Monday October 21, 2002 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
Hospital makes 135 drug errors a week.
Thursday December 5, 2002 [London] |
| |
|
|
|
|
When hospital consultant Leyla Sanai became a patient herself, she was shocked
by the state of Britain's wards - and not in the least surprised to catch a
superbug.
Tuesday
January 21, 2003 The Guardian [Scotland, with adverse mention of Birmingham
and favourable mention of Royal Free] |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
London: A five-month wait for surgery.
Sunday
May 25, 2003 The Observer |
| |
|
|
|
|
Virus danger shuts down hospital labs. Inspectors act to prevent deadly
germ leaks after safety lapses. Antony Barnett, public affairs editor
Sunday
June 1, 2003 The Observer [Royal Brompton, Hammersmith, Truro and
Warrington] |
| |
|
|
|
|
Where the treatment centres will be. The health secretary, John Reid, today
announced details of the government's controversial programme of privately run
fast-track diagnostic and treatment centres, and a number of new mobile
ophthalmology units. This guide explains where they will be.
Friday September 12, 2003 [South-west peninsula (Mercury Health Ltd),
Lincolnshire (Mercury Health Ltd), Horton hospital, north Oxford (Mercury Health
Ltd), North-east Yorks (Mercury Health Ltd), Southampton (Mercury Health Ltd),
Northumberland (Mercury Health Ltd), East Berkshire (Slough, Bracknell,
Maidenhead and Windsor/Ascot) (Mercury Health Ltd), Didcot, Oxfordshire (Mercury
Health Ltd), Ashford, Surrey (Mercury Health Ltd), Maidstone (Care UK Afrox),
Barlborough Links, Nottinghamshire (Care UK Afrox), Derriford, Plymouth (Care UK
Afrox), Chase Farm, Barnet, London (Anglo Canadian), King
George hospital, Redbridge (Anglo Canadian), Royal National throat
nose and ear hospital, Kings Cross, London (Anglo Canadian), Bradford
(Nations Healthcare), Burton (Nations Healthcare), Daventry (Birkdale Clinic),
Trafford, Greater Manchester (Netcare UK), Royal National Orthopaedic
Hospital, Stanmore (New York Presbyterian), Shepton Mallet, Somerset
(New York Presbyterian).
Two mobile units will offer ophthalmology services in the following areas:
Cheshire and Merseyside (Netcare UK), Cumbria and Lancashire (Netcare UK),
Horton, Oxfordshire (Netcare UK), Wycombe, Bucks (Netcare UK), North Tyneside
(Netcare UK), South-west Oxfordshire (Netcare UK), North-west peninsula (Netcare
UK), Dorset/Somerset (Netcare UK), Kent/Medway (Netcare UK), Hants and Isle of
Wight (Netcare UK), Surrey and Sussex (Netcare UK), Thames Valley (Netcare UK)] |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
A Swedish consortium is likely to win a £900m deal to redevelop St
Bartholomew's Hospital in London - despite there being insufficient bidders for
the contract under government private finance initiative guidelines. Terry
Macalister
Tuesday November 11, 2003 The Guardian
|
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Walk-in unit a godsend to those with no GP. With its new drop-in unit and
extra GPs Enfield is tackling its primary care crisis. Sarah Boseley and John
Carvel
Monday November 17, 2003 The Guardian |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
The private consortium made preferred bidder for the £900m redevelopment
of St Bartholomew's and the Royal London hospitals has been accused of a
conflict of interest. Terry Macalister
Monday December 1, 2003 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
The government yesterday named and shamed hospital trusts where patients
were most at risk of catching one of the most feared superbugs as part of a
more aggressive campaign to reduce hospital-acquired infections in England.
James Meikle, health correspondent
Saturday December 6, 2003 The Guardian [Acute NHS trusts with the highest rates of MRSA per 1,000 bed days for 2002/03:
Lewisham Hospital 0.24, Epsom & St Helier 0.24, Dartford & Gravesham 0.24,
Queen Mary's Sidcup 0.25, Countess of Chester Hospital 0.26, East & North Hertfordshire 0.26, West
Middlesex University 0.27, Barnet & Chase Farm Hospitals 0.28,
Ealing Hospital 0.29, North Middlesex Hospital 0.30, Weston Area Health 0.30
] |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
The government yesterday chose a Swedish-led consortium to undertake
Britain's first £1bn hospital redevelopment scheme after ministers dismissed
allegations of a conflict of interest. Tash Shifrin and John Carvel
Thursday December 11, 2003 The Guardian [St Batholomew's} |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Halliburton, the American construction group, is being wooed by British
government officials seeking new capacity to take on hospital schemes under the
private finance initiative. The Department of Health is alarmed by the absence
of domestic firms queuing up to take on new schemes which has already forced a
dilution of the PFI competition rules. The latest trouble surrounds the £300m
Vanguard hospital project in Plymouth, which has been falling behind schedule
because of a lack of interest from the private sector. This follows the £620m
redevelopment project for Barts and the Royal London hospitals, for which only
two companies bid. Terry Macalister
Monday
April 5, 2004 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Just six months after opening, Britain's first private walk-in casualty
unit has expanded to offer day surgery services, the company announced today.
Casualty Plus has opened two new operating theatres and is offering fixed
price day surgery procedures at its site in Brentford, west London, because of
its unexpected success. Roxanne Escobales and agencies
Friday April 16, 2004
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Conventional cleaning has "little impact" in eliminating the so-called
superbug MRSA in hospitals, according to research published today. The
study at Guy's and St Thomas' hospital in London found rooms occupied by
patients with MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus) contaminated
with the infection after the walls had been mopped and the furniture cleaned.
Thursday April 22, 2004
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Reports of the hospital superbug MRSA went up another 3.6% last year,
Department of Health (DoH) figures revealed today, with Guy's and St Thomas's
trust showing the highest infection rate. Tash Shifrin
Wednesday July 14, 2004
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
London's mayor, Ken Livingstone, is set to veto Britain's first £1bn
hospital under the private finance initiative after its design was today
severely criticised by the government's architecture watchdog. The project to
rebuild the Royal London hospital in east London as an 18-storey block
"recreates mistakes made in the 1960s", according to the Commission for
Architecture and the Built Environment (Cabe). Matt Weaver
Tuesday August 3, 2004 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
More than 550 patients who underwent shoulder investigations over seven
years have been offered blood tests to establish whether they were
accidentally infected with diseases such as HIV or hepatitis. A procedure used
as part of research at the London outpatients' clinic of the Royal National
Orthopaedic Hospital involved probes that were sometimes reused on NHS and
private patients. Cleaning with alcohol would not have been sufficient to
offer 100% protection against all viruses, hospital officials admitted
yesterday, two years after they were first alerted to the problem, which has
been reported to the General Medical Council for investigation. James Meikle,
health correspondent
Wednesday
September 8, 2004 The Guardian
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
One of the government's biggest hospital building projects is in jeopardy
after a damning review of its financial management. The Paddington Health
Campus, a plan for west London which includes redeveloping St Mary's Hospital,
the Royal Brompton and Harefield, which are both heart hospitals, and Imperial
College, has seen costs rise from £382 million to £800m last year after a series
of planning blunders. Jo Revill, health editor
Sunday
October 3, 2004 The Observer
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Commuters will be able to get free medical attention on their way to and
from work at a chain of NHS walk-in centres to be built near city-centre
stations, the government announced yesterday. John Hutton, the health minister,
said the first seven centres would open in the spring in
London,
Newcastle,
Manchester and
Leeds at a cost of £25m over the first three years. John Carvel,
social affairs editor
Thursday November 4, 2004
|
| |
|
|
|
|
What really bugs NHS patients: the dirt. A 'lively' public meeting in
Enfield changed government thinking on hospitals. Sarah Boseley and John Carvel
Monday February 7, 2005 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Veteran campaigner (Jean Brett) leads fight to save Harefield hospital.
Mark Gould
Wednesday February 16, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Great Ormond Street Hospital in London has had to close up to one-fifth of
its its beds, cancel operations and turn away dozens of critically ill
children because of the severe financial problems it faces. The news that the
world-famous children's hospital is having to close its doors to patients will
highlight the serious cost pressures on the NHS and re-ignite the political
debate over where the extra billions of pounds earmarked for hospitals has
been spent. Jo Revill and Gaby Hinsliff
Sunday March 6, 2005 The Observer
|
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Great Ormond Street is one of the wealthiest hospitals in the world. It
is now in the middle of a multi-million pound redevelopment. Its fundraising
campaigns are backed by celebrities and its old wards will be transformed
within the next five years. Its pioneering care for sick children and
authoritative expertise on anything from leukaemia to depression continues
to win national and international acclaim. Yet despite all that the hospital
doesn't have the money it needs to keep its beds open. The millions of
pounds raised for the new development cannot be spent on daily running costs
as the NHS does not allow such transfers of money. Many hospitals facing
deficits would do as Great Ormond Street is - cancel operations, close beds
and cut the nursing bill. They may not be so high profile, but every trust
must balance its books. Great Ormond Street's deficit - £1.7 million - is
tiny compared with the £184m spent each day on the NHS. But it must make
itself as financially lean as possible to win the approval of the Health
Secretary, John Reid, for it to become a foundation trust, cherished status
that brings some independence. Jo Revill, health editor
Sunday March 6, 2005 The Observer
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Showpiece hospital faces axe. Jo Revill, health editor, reports on how
plans to close a major London teaching hospital in a marginal Labour seat are
being kept secret until after the general election.
Sunday April 10, 2005 The Observer
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Nothing is more difficult for a politician or a health administrator than
to close a hospital. Conservative proposals to close or merge several
hospitals in London in the early 1990s proved to be the undoing of Virginia
Bottomley, then Health Secretary, who failed to understand how passionately
attached people were to their local NHS. Jo Revill
Sunday April 10, 2005 The Observer |
| |
|
|
|
|
The health secretary, John Reid, yesterday ordered urgent special measures
at a hospital maternity unit where 10 mothers have died in the past three
years. He intervened at Northwick Park hospital, north London, after NHS
investigators said they were extremely concerned that women's safety was being
compromised. James Meikle, health correspondent
Friday
April 22, 2005 The Guardian
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
An ambitious plan to build a £1 billion state-of-the-art hospital for
London, replacing the Harefield and Royal Brompton heart hospitals, has fallen
through, and developers are privately accusing civil servants of scuppering the
deal because of alarm over costs and possible political fallout as the election
looms. The proposal was to create the 'Paddington Health Campus', taking
Harefield and the Royal Brompton and redeveloping them with St Mary's Hospital
on land near Paddington station. But the consortium that owns the land,
Paddington Development Corporation Ltd (PDCL), has withdrawn from all
negotiations. Jo Revill, health editor
Sunday April 24, 2005 The Observer |
| |
|
|
|
|
The government was yesterday celebrating an apparent downturn in the figures
for MRSA infection in hospitals, which have dropped by 6% in the last six months
by comparison with the same period last year. But opposition critics claimed the
figures - published for six months rather than 12 as has been the norm - gave a
misleading impression, and it is clear that good progress on fighting hospital
acquired infection in London is not matched in all parts of the country. League
tables, published on the government website, revealed widely varying rates of
infections at different hospitals. Sarah Boseley, health editor
Tuesday
March 8, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
An NHS trust was fined £28,000 yesterday for a series of systematic
failures which led to a psychiatric nurse being battered to death by a
schizophrenic patient. An Old Bailey judge fined South West London and St
George's Mental Health NHS Trust, and ordered it to pay £14,000 costs, after
the trust admitted neglect which contributed to the death of Eshan Chattun. Mr
Chattun, 34, was beaten to death in June 2003 while working at Springfield
hospital in south London. Faisal al Yafai
Friday
May 6, 2005 The Guardian
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Banks and property developers made windfall profits of £73m by refinancing
one of the Labour government's first privately financed hospitals, the 989-bed
Norfolk and Norwich hospital, the National Audit Office reveals in a report
published today. The windfall is the third to be disclosed by parliament's
financial watchdog after complaints from MPs and the public. The other two are
Fazakerley prison in Liverpool and the Dartford and Gravesham hospital. The
report says that funding for five other privately financed hospitals - South
Buckinghamshire, Calderdale, North Durham, Bromley and South Manchester - could
also yield windfall profits for developers. David Hencke, Westminster
correspondent
Friday June 10, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
It was flagged as one of the most ambitious hospital projects in Europe. But
with costs spiralling out of control, the canalside Paddington Health Campus is
set to be sunk. Mark Gould reports on a PFI flop.
Wednesday June 15, 2005 The Guardian
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
The NHS will axe its biggest ever hospital investment today, scrapping plans
for a private finance initiative to build a £1.1bn healthcare and research
campus in west
London. Patricia Hewitt, the health secretary, will approve an
independent inquiry into how the scheme for a super-hospital in Paddington
wasted eight years of effort and almost £14m in project costs before being
cancelled without a brick being laid. Mark Gould and John Carvel
Tuesday
June 21, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
Fifteen hospitals have been hit by outbreaks of the new strain of the
hospital superbug Clostridium difficile which has so far contributed to 25
deaths, ministers have admitted. So far there have been 75 cases confirmed by
scientists at the specialist laboratory in Cardiff - the only one in the UK
equipped to analysis the new strain - health minister Jane Kennedy said
yesterday. The statistics reveal the outbreak of the new strain, which last week
was confirmed at a second hospital in the UK, is much wider than originally
believed. Hospitals where the strain has appeared are in: Preston, Birmingham,
Winchester, Bristol, Romford, Southampton, Truro, Carshalton, High Wycombe,
South Tyneside, Newcastle, South Tees, Sunderland, Stoke Mandeville and Exeter.
Debbie Andalo
Thursday
June 30, 2005 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
A London NHS trust has imposed an indefinite recruitment freeze on nursing
and medical staff in order to balance its books, SocietyGuardian.co.uk has
learned. St George's Healthcare NHS Trust was unable to comment on the
duration of the freeze, which a trust insider claims has been set at three
years. Hélène Mulholland
Monday
August 8, 2005
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
A legal challenge from local residents that threatened to stall the biggest
ever private finance initiative (PFI) hospital building project in the UK has
been abandoned, after protesters were warned that they could be liable for the
legal costs of the local council and the hospital trust. The crumbling Royal
London hospital in the East End dates back to 1752 and has a Grade II-listed
19th-century facade. It is being rebuilt as part of a £1.2bn PFI project that
also includes St Bartholomew's Hospital in the City. Mark Gould
Wednesday August 10, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
Patients on the NHS are staying in a four-star luxury hotel while they
receive treatment for leukaemia and other malignant blood disorders at a leading
London hospital. Ensuite double rooms with buffet English breakfast at £168 a
night at the Radisson Edwardian Grafton Hotel in Tottenham Court Road are
proving a boon for patients seeking privacy and family support. After daily
treatment at University College hospital (UCH), 100 yards away, they can relax
in the quiet of their hotel room with family and friends, without the risk of
hospital acquired infection, and without the £3.50 charge that hospital patients
have to pay to watch television. James Meikle, health correspondent
Saturday
August 20, 2005 The Guardian
|
| |
|
3 |
|
|
A London NHS trust is cutting 300 jobs on top of an indefinite recruitment
freeze in a desperate bid to plug a multi-million pound deficit. Around 70
staff at St George's healthcare NHS trust face redundancy, with the remaining
cuts expected to come from a reduction in the use of expensive agency staff.
Hélène Mulholland
Friday September 23, 2005 |
| |
2 |
3 |
|
|
A flagship NHS hospital which opened four years ago under the government's
private finance initiative admitted last night that it has become technically
insolvent. Senior managers of Queen Elizabeth hospital NHS trust in Woolwich,
south-east London, spoke to the Guardian after a warning from auditors that
the annual deficit will climb to £100m by 2008-09 unless the government
restructures a crippling PFI debt. The problems cast doubt on assurances from
Patricia Hewitt, the health secretary, that the NHS's financial difficulties
can be resolved by "turnaround teams" of management consultants which she sent
out this month to correct a £623m forecast deficit across England. John
Carvel, social affairs editor
Friday December 16, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
A world-famous London teaching hospital has become the latest victim of a
financial crisis in the NHS. University College hospital was given a maximum
risk rating yesterday by Monitor, the foundation trust regulator, after posting
a £17.4m loss over the first six months of the financial year. It blamed part of
the deficit on the terrorist bombings in London in July, which resulted in the
loss of four days of normal activity, adding £2m to the deficit. UCLH already
had clearance to declare a £6m deficit for 2005-06 to cover the cost of moving
its main hospital. But Monitor was alarmed at an unexpected deterioration of the
balance sheet between October and November, when not enough patients were
treated and cost savings did not materialise. It declared the trust to be
"failing to exercise its functions in an effective, efficient and economic way".
The failings, it said, were "significant". John Carvel, social affairs editor
Saturday December 17, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Hospitals feel pain of funding problems. The FT says the Department of
Health's decision to review the St Bartholemew's and Royal London PFI project
"is a symptom of a deeper malaise affecting large-scale PFI hospital
projects". Patricia Hewitt has hinted that in future there will be more
reliance on "LIFT" (local infrastructure trusts) and fewer big PFI hospitals.
An NHS executive said: "My guess is that Birmingham, and Barts and the London,
will go ahead. But they will be the last of the mega-deals". Other PFI
projects that could be in doubt include the £700m rebuild of University of
Birmingham Hospitals. Minutes from a board meeting of financial regulator
Monitor show that the DoH asked Monitor to approve the scheme's affordability
- a request that was refused on the grounds that the guarantor, not the
regulator, should carry the commercial risk. Treasury officials are known to
be sceptical about four big projects in Liverpool worth £1bn. Schemes in
Bristol, Plymouth, Hertfordshire and Leicester could also be in question.
Summary by Keep our NHS
Public of Financial Times 27 December 2005 (subscription needed to
access FT articles) |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
The health secretary, Patricia Hewitt, has imposed a review of the biggest
hospital rebuilding project in Britain, casting into doubt Labour's
multibillion pound private finance initiative in modernising the NHS. Ms
Hewitt has not only questioned the affordability of the £1bn plan to rebuild
the Royal London hospital in Whitechapel and partly rebuild St Bartholomew's
in Smithfield - founded in 1123 and England's oldest hospital, but is also
asking whether projects on this scale will best serve patients' needs in an
age of rapidly-changing healthcare. Ms Hewitt's decision to question the
scheme reflects growing concern about the ability of hospital trusts to bear
the huge annual costs of servicing 25-40 year PFI deals at a time when
hospitals' guaranteed incomes have been plunged into uncertainty by the new
payment-by-results policy. Michael White, political editor
Wednesday December 28, 2005 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Serious shortcomings in the rescue operation after the London bombings
were revealed by emergency staff yesterday. Hospitals complained of being
starved of vital information and of having radios that only worked "10% to 15%
of the time". Hugh Muir
Thursday January 12, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
A thousand doctors from St Bartholomew's and the Royal London hospitals
have protested at the health secretary's refusal to approve a £1.15bn
rebuilding scheme, weeks before contracts were due to be signed. Patricia
Hewitt ordered a review of the project amid growing concerns that hospitals
rebuilt under the private finance initiative will not be able to service their
debts. The review will consider whether cancer and cardiac services at Bart's,
in Smithfield, could be relocated elsewhere. But the trust believes that
changes at this late stage would threaten a scheme that has taken years to
develop. Tania Branigan, political correspondent
Monday January 16, 2006 The Guardian
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Billion-pound
hospitals plan faces collapse. Ministers are considering scaling back or
cancelling about ten PFI hospital building schemes, including projects in
Bristol, Liverpool and Newcastle, due to concerns over cost. Under payment by
results, hospitals do not have a guaranteed income and due to patient choice
they could potentially close, leaving the Department of Health worried about
the viability of the PFI. 24 PFI schemes with a total capital spend of £2.1bn
have been completed. 14 more schemes, worth £3bn, have been approved. A
further £12.1bn worth of projects are awaiting approval. A DoH source told the
Times "Ministers are considering how to make it clearer that PFI schemes have
to make financial sense. They are looking at how we got into this position and
how to avoid it happening again." Patricia Hewitt ordered a last minute review
of the St Barts and Royal London PFI project in December. If a decision is not
made by the end of January the contract with private partner Skanska will
lapse and the consortium will be entitled to walk away with costs of £100m
paid, or to continue and be paid more.
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of Times
16 January 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Doctors'
concern for cancer care. 1,000 doctors at St Bartholomew's and the Royal
London hospitals, including 450 consultants, have signed a letter to The Times
protesting at government plans to renege on a £1.15 billion deal to rebuild
the two hospitals. They say: "These hospitals have some of the best clinical
outcomes for the treatment of cancer and heart disease. They serve Europe's
most ethnically diverse population. The loss of any of these services would be
damaging to the health of this vulnerable population and irretrievably damage
our medical school…It would be a cruel injustice to the population of East
London if 13 years of planning for the new hospitals were ended by the
collapse of the scheme."
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of Times
16 January 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Aborting PFI
project could cost £100m. The cost of aborting the St Barts and Royal
London PFI project - currently being reviewed by the Department of Health -
could be £100m. If it is not approved by 31 January, construction company
Skanska will be entitled to leave the project and charge £100m to cover its
costs. Alternatively, the firm could continue on the basis that it will be
paid more.
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of
Hospital Doctor 19 January 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Can PFI climb
up off its sickbed? After the Bart's brouhaha, what's next for the axe?
High costs and the uncertainty of hospital income under payment by results
have put large-scale PFI projects in doubt. Industry insiders are now looking
to the smaller LIFT scheme for the future of health building projects.
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of
Independent on Sunday 22 January 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
East End
hospitals have a crucial role. Members of the Patient and Public
Involvement Forum for Bart's and The Royal London Trust have written to the
Guardian to call for the £1,15bn PFI project, currently being reviewed by the
Department of Health, to be put back on track.
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of
Guardian 23 January 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
The hospital that will lose £35m this year (Hammersmith Hospital).
Jacqueline Maley Thursday
January 26, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Nine in ten say
NHS will not break even next year. Only 13% of NHS chief executives
surveyed by HSJ expect the NHS to break even by April 2007, as Patricia Hewitt
has demanded. 32% forecast their own trust would still be in debt. King's Fund
chief economist John Appleby said: "'There has got to be much better costing
of current policies. What impact is patient choice going to have on demand
? We have no idea. I do not think they have thought it through. The
major policy this government has pursued since Labour came to power has been
to improve access to hospitals by cutting waiting times, but we have never
seen a figure on how much this has cost the NHS." The full 18 trusts named by
Hewitt as being the worst performing are: Acute -
Hammersmith Hospitals;
Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals; Mid Yorkshire Hospitals; The Royal West
Sussex; Surrey and Sussex Healthcare; Brighton and Sussex University
Hospitals; University Hospital of North Staffordshire; Shrewsbury and Telford
Hospitals; George Eliot Hospital (Nuneaton). Primary Care Trusts -
Hillingdon
(London); Selby and York; Cheshire West; West Wiltshire; Kennet and North
Wiltshire; Sheffield PCTs (four organisations).
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 26 January 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Staff shortages
force closure. The Barnet Psychiatric Unit was closed until further notice
on 6 January, without consultation. An internal memo from Barnet, Enfield and
Haringey Mental Health trust said the closure was due to a "critical staff
situation" following a recruitment freeze. The trust is predicting a £600,000
deficit. Pressure group BPU Action said just £600 a week would be saved by the
decision not to employ two agency staff to retain the service. 18 patients
will now have to travel to Edgware Hospital for care.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 26 January 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Primary care
opened up to commercial operators. The health white paper will announce six
pilot schemes to open up the primary care market to companies such as United
Health and Care UK. The projects will be centrally procured "to get economies of
scale and to tempt new providers with significant capital backing". PCTs will
then decide which services they want, including services in high streets and
supermarkets, nurse-led practices and diagnostic centres that combine health and
social care. The pilots will operate in London, Liverpool, Bradford, Plymouth
and Ribble Valley, with ten more areas lined-up. Hewitt will also launch a
"social enterprise unit" to aid professionals in setting up not-for-profit
businesses. The FT says: "This is aimed, over time, at creating a purchaser/
provider split under which PCTs will chiefly purchase from a growing
range of independent providers." Department of Health sources say the shift from
hospitals to community care will move 5% of activity out of hospitals over a
decade, about £2.5bn a year. This would force reconfiguration and in some cases
closures. Meanwhile the increase in payment for treatments will only be 1.5%
next year. This below inflation rise is intended to save £3bn in order to
eliminate trusts' structural deficits and overspends and increase efficiency. It
has been described by John Appleby, Kings Fund chief economist, as "very
challenging if not impossible".
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of Financial Times 28 January 2006 |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
NHS patients
pay cash for superior care. Health Service patients are paying for
enhanced levels of care and operations that are no longer available free at
hospitals across England, in initiatives that are being criticised as the
creation of a two-tier health service and privatisation by stealth. Harrogate
and District NHS Foundation Trust is to open the Foundation Skin clinic,
described by managers as a "halfway house" between state and private care. The
clinic will carry out procedures like the removal of moles and warts,
screening of moles and Botox injections to reduce heavy sweating - all for a
fee. Trust managers admit that the initiative is a response to funding
shortages. Some of the services were offered free by the trust until 2003.
Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea NHS hospital in London recently began to offer
one-to-one midwife treatment for £4,000. Professor Allyson Pollock, director
of the Centre for International Public Health Policy at Edinburgh University,
says the most vulnerable patients are suffering as a result of fees being
widely introduced. "It is shocking that NHS patients can pay for a higher
level of care. They are getting priority treatment and are able to pick and
choose." Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of
Sunday Times 29 January 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Health trust
debts more than £1bn. An investigation by the BBC has found that NHS
trusts are more than £1bn in debt. Every trust was asked for its financial
position and the total for the whole country showed a debt of £1.07bn. The
government has said it expects deficits to be less than £200m by April. Half
of trusts told the BBC they are in debt, compared with government claims that
it is a quarter. London and the Home Counties carry much of the debt, with
London responsible for a quarter of the total. Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust
has the largest single debt, at £35.3m. Management there have cut 300 jobs.
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online 30
January 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS in London
is £240m in debt. Of London's 75 NHS trusts, 16 have a debt of above £5m
or more, 10 of £10m or more and six of at least £15m. Hammersmith Hospitals
NHS Trust had the biggest debt at £35.3m, followed by Hillingdon Primary Care
Trust (£25.6m). North West London Hospitals NHS Trust has the third highest
debt at £25.5m, Kensington and Chelsea Primary Care Trust (PCT) has a debt of
£20.9m, Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust is £18.9m in deficit and University
College London Hospitals NHS Trust is £17.4m in the red. Hillingdon PCT
introduced a recruitment freeze for several months but had to lift it when it
caused a service to be clinically unsafe. Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online
30 January 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Ministers balk at Barts' £1.15bn development project. John Carvel, social
affairs editor
Wednesday
February 1, 2006 The Guardian
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
'Gerrymandering':
Hewitt accused. A health scrutiny committee has invited Patricia Hewitt to
explain a decision to overrule NHS managers on the location of a new hospital.
Hewitt rejected plans to build a new critical care hospital in Sutton, opting
instead to situate it in St Helier in Carshalton on the grounds that it could do
more to reduce health inequalities in this more deprived area. Epsom and Ewell
Conservative MP Chris Grayling said her decision was "party political" and a
"blatant act of gerrymandering", because it came after representations by a
Labour council and a Labour MP. He said the decision had caused a "stand-up row"
between Hewitt and Sir Nigel Crisp. Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 2
February 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Deadline for
Bart's as Hewitt rethinks £1bn hospital plans. The Independent on Sunday
reports signs that Patricia Hewitt has caved in to pressure from the Treasury
over the £1.1bn PFI project for rebuilding St Barts and the Royal London
hospitals. The Treasury fears the scheme is unaffordable, and now Hewitt is
thought to be preparing to postpone half the work, most likely the St Barts side
of the project. A Department of Health source said: "Patricia Hewitt needs to
convince herself totally that the business case for this project stacks up if
she's going to take on the Treasury."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Independent 5 February 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Stealth plan to
redevelop Barts may herald its break-up. The Government may decide to give
the green light to half the £1.1bn PFI rebuilding programme for St Barts and
Royal London hospitals, and defer funding on the second half. The second phase
of the project involves 50% of the redevelopment of Bart's, including all
cardiac services, as well as refurbishment of the dental hospital and outpatient
buildings at the Royal London Hospital. Meanwhile the delays are currently
costing an estimated £500,000 a day and Skanska Innisfree, the PFI consortium,
has threatened a £100 million claim against the trust if the deal does not go
through.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Times 6 February 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
The head of Barts hospital in London last night warned the health secretary,
Patricia Hewitt, against an "unlawful" proposal to withhold approval for part of
its £1.1bn redevelopment scheme. John Carvel, social affairs editor
Monday
February 6, 2006 The Guardian
|
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Trusts told:
ask tax office if you can delay tax and NI. North West London SHA has
requested that all its mental health, primary care and acute trusts ask local
tax offices if they can withhold PAYE payments for February until the next
financial year. The health authority is £94m in debt and has even asked trusts
in surplus to apply the measure. So far at least one trust, West Middlesex
University Hospital trust, has been given permission by its local tax office
to delay payment, but others, including St Mary's trust, which is estimating a
£2.45m surplus, and Royal Brompton and Harefield trust, have refused to go
along with the scheme. Last month the Treasury said trusts were legally
obliges to pay their taxes on time. Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 9
February 2006 |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
Fears over
£4,000 midwife scheme. The Royal College of Midwives has criticised a
scheme offering mothers-to-be one-to-one care from a midwife for a £4,000 fee.
Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital in London offers 24-hour access to the
same NHS midwife throughout pregnancy and labour to women who can afford it.
The RCM said it compromised the belief that everyone is entitled to "high
quality, one-to-one care", and that it created a two-tier system. The RCM
called for "more working midwives, not extra charges for mothers". Hammersmith
Hospitals NHS Trust, that runs Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, said
more than £160,000 had been generated from the scheme so far. Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 14 February 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
The cost of ministers' indecision: £600,000 a day. · Hewitt accused of
stalling over signoff deadline · Workers paid on retainer racking up daily
costs. Sandra Laville
Thursday
February 16, 2006 The Guardian
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Group out to
protect the NHS. Greenwich Keep Our NHS Public has been formed to campaign
against the marketisation of the NHS. Of particular local concern is the Queen
Elizabeth Hospital in Woolwich, where the new PFI hospital costs £9m a year more
than a traditionally financed hospital of the same size, causing huge financial
problems.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
News Shopper 16 February 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
PCT chair
resigns citing declining funding. The chair of Hillingdon primary care
trust has resigned, citing its deteriorating finances as one of the reasons
for her decision. In a letter to staff, Sarah Pond delivered a parting shot at
government funding of the PCT, which she said had contributed to a predicted
deficit of £27.3m for the end of the financial year. Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 16 February 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
London's health
authorities warn overspend of up to £400m likely. London's five strategic
health authorities, and the five that surround them, are currently projecting
an overspend of at least £378m based on December's figures, with some saying
the numbers could rise. This means the figure for the London area alone is
twice what the Department of Health ordered the entire NHS to reduce its
overspend to - £200m. Surrey and Sussex is projecting an £87m deficit, North
West London is projecting a £106m deficit (up almost £10m on the September
figure), South West London £30m and South East London more than £39m.
Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire predicts a £95m overspend, and while the
figures for other London and home counties authorities are lower, only one,
North Central London, expects to break even. None is forecasting a surplus.
Further afield, the Audit Commission has issued public interest reports on
Suffolk's PCTs, warning they are heading for a £33.6m overspend and that their
"immediate financial viability is placed in doubt". Meanwhile, Tony Blair has
met the NHS Partners Network, a new body representing 11 private sector
organisations that are supplying operations and diagnostic procedures to NHS
patients through IS-TCs. This has led to the effective collapse of the private
sector's trade body, the Independent Healthcare Forum, which included
insurance companies who called for tax breaks on private medical insurance. In
contrast the Partners Network has issued a document declaring that "we support
the NHS - in principle and in practice" and that they have a "commitment to
[its] future success". Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of
Financial Times 17 February 2006 |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
Minister
"uncomfortable" about charges for enhanced NHS services. Health Minister
Jane Kennedy told the Commons health select committee that the government will
investigate extra services provided at a charge by NHS hospitals, including a
special service for pregnant women at Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea hospital,
who can pay £4,000 to have a named midwife working with them through to the
birth. She said such a service should be offered free on the NHS, and the only
thing preventing it was a lack of midwives. Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of Western Daily Press 20 February 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Right to review
Barts. A letter to the Guardian from health minister Jane Kennedy says: "The
cost of a rash judgment on the redevelopment of Barts would have had far more
serious implications than our decision to carry out a review. Given the scale of
the proposals, the large sums of taxpayers' cash involved and the significant
reductions in waiting lists in recent years, it would have been reckless to go
ahead without proper scrutiny…The NHS is not contractually bound to pay any
increase in building costs and the final figure is open to negotiation. Our
policy has successfully delivered new hospitals in the past and there is every
reason to believe it will continue to do so."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Guardian 21 February 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Is the PFI empire
crumbling? As well as large PFI projects at St Barts, Plymouth and
Birmingham being put on hold, regional health bosses are due to carry out
reviews in the coming months into the value for money, affordability and need
for about a half a dozen other schemes.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online 23 February 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Hospitals
decision. The Treasury has reportedly balked at the cost of the Barts and
Royal London PFI scheme, and agreed to proceed only after substantial cuts have
been made.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Times 01 March 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Hospital to
mothball 250 beds. Managers at Barts and the London NHS Trust revealed that
they have struck a deal with the Government that will allow the PFI hospital to
be built, but leave it with fewer beds than they have now. Wards will be left
empty to save £20m from the original scheme. Two floors at the Royal London
Hospital and one at Barts will be mothballed once building work is complete.
According to figures from the trust and the developers, Skanska Innisfree, the
delay caused by the government's decision at Christmas to review the project has
added an extra £35 million to the bill.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Telegraph
5 March 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Doctors yesterday welcomed the long-awaited approval of the scheme to
rebuild two teaching hospitals in London in the biggest private finance
initiative within the National Health Service. Patricia Hewitt, the health
secretary, approved the redevelopment of St Bartholomew's hospital and the Royal
London after delays which patient groups and the hospital trust claimed had
added £35m to the £1.1bn cost. The decision to go ahead with the redevelopment
of Barts will saddle the local healthcare trust with a 30-year financial
commitment. Across the NHS, PFI schemes, which form the backbone of new hospital
projects, are being re-examined over growing fears about the ability of trusts
to repay the private companies over 25 to 40 years. Sandra Laville and Terry
Macalister
Thursday March 9, 2006 The Guardian
|
| |
|
3 |
|
|
London health
trusts get cash warning over treating patients. Hospitals in the capital
have been told to slow their work rate and turn away patients referred by GPs,
unless their treatment has been approved by their primary care trust. London
trusts have been ordered to cut 5% from their pay bill, by reducing the use of
agency staff, and will have 3% of their cash allocation for next year held
back to provide a cushion for the leaner years to come. The memos to London
PCTs, issued from the office of John Bacon, NHS finance manager, warn trusts
against "unexpected over-achievement" in their efforts to cut waiting times.
"PCTs will expect trusts to co-operate in these difficult times. In
particular, trusts should not assume 'referral' is 'authorisation to treat' in
these circumstances. If they do so, having received a request to assist a PCT
in managing workload, they should not presume payment will be made for
activity that could have been delayed, without breaching maximum waiting
times."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Independent 9 March 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Trusts do better
than most of NHS. Foundation trust regulator Monitor says that
foundation trusts are performing better than the NHS as a whole. The 32
foundation trusts, which between them provide about 20% of all hospital
treatment, had a £9m deficit in December at the end of their third quarter.
This debt is largely due to
University College Hospitals London, which is facing a rising
overspend of more than £29m.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Financial Times 14 March 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Flagship
foundation £29m in the red. University College London Hospitals foundation
trust hit a deficit of £29.4m by the end of December, has breached its licence
and could be subject to a Monitor intervention if it fails to improve. It has
only avoided such a fate so far by voluntarily calling in consultants KPMG.
Elsewhere Moorfields Eye Hospital foundation trust could also face
intervention after it became the only trust to be rated red for governance
risk. A further 19 foundations were rated amber and in danger of not meeting
all national targets.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 17 March 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
A wave of redundancies across the NHS in England gathered force yesterday
when a London teaching hospital announced that nearly 500 posts will be axed
in an attempt to dig the trust out of deficit. The Royal Free hospital in
Hampstead, north London, said about 480 jobs would be lost under plans to
achieve savings of £25m in the next year. The trust said it would do
everything possible to ensure redundancies were kept to a minimum. Its
announcement was followed by further job cuts at Queen Mary's hospital in
Sidcup, where 103 nursing and midwifery posts are being cut. John Carvel,
social affairs editor
Thursday March 23, 2006 The Guardian
|
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Nurses fired as
bosses are hired. The Royal Free Hospital in London, which is axing 480
jobs and 100 beds, is at the same time advertising for four risk managers
with salaries of up to £41,000. The total bill would be enough to pay for
eight nurses. The move has been condemned by the RCN and Unison. The Tories
say that since 1997 the number of managers in the NHS has increased at three
times the rate of doctors and nurses, meaning there are more administrators
than there are beds. At the NHS SOS conference, organised by the NHS Support
Federation and Keep Our NHS Public, former health secretary Frank Dobson is
calling on the government to suspend further NHS reforms for fear that they
will just worsen the service's financial problems: "The main cause of
deficits, cuts, closures, job losses and reductions in patient care in the
NHS is the latest round of re-organisation. If the Health Department pays
out hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers' money to private hospitals
and management consultants then it's not available for the NHS. Even more
damaging is the paper chase and bureaucracy of the new system which is
costing upwards of £12 billion - three times what it cost under the old
system. The payment by results experiment threatened from 1 April is just
that - an experiment. The NHS is too important to be experimented on -
people's health is at stake." Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Express 26 March 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
'Brown to blame
for crisis in the NHS'. A YouGov poll for The Daily Telegraph shows that
Gordon Brown is being blamed for the financial crisis in the NHS. There is a
growing impression that he is not spending enough on the health service, and
his own personal popularity ratings are falling. 64% of those questioned
believe that there is a financial crisis throughout the NHS, with hospitals
having to cut back on patient care. Asked which should receive any extra
money, education or the NHS, a large majority favoured the health service
over schools. Meanwhile the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Woolwich, which has
admitted it is technically insolvent due to it's PFI debt, has announced it
will lose 100 posts. It has debts of £100m.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Telegraph 31 March 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Up to 100 jobs to
go. Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Woolwich is to cut up to 100 jobs,
including nurses, as part of plans to save £10m. Cuts will include closing
the hospital's Hippos Day Care children's unit, which has seven beds, and
axing six posts on the ward, putting five nurses at risk of redundancy;
closing six beds on the stroke unit in July to save £75,000, plus a further
19 bed closures; and reducing "unnecessary" tests carried out on patients.
One nurse who works on the Hippos Day Care children's unit, who asked not to
be named, said: "We are going to fight this. The nurses on this ward are
trained in important skills, such as taking blood from children, and there
are not many nurses on the main children's ward trained to do this." Another
nurse said: "We're already understaffed… I feel I can't do my job properly
because I can't give patients the level of care and attention they deserve.
This will lead to complaints and patient care will definitely be affected."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
News Shopper 31 March 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Out-of-hours cash crisis set to force GPs into opting out. More than 500
GPs who chose to provide out-of-hours services under the
new contract are considering
opting out because of worsening NHS funding problems. PCTs in south-east
London have withdrawn £1m of funding from local GP co-op Seldoc, forcing it
to hike charges by 50% from 1 July. The co-op has written to GPs asking them
to consider whether it would be more economic to opt out of the scheme.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 3 April 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Hospitals plan.
Capital Hospital is to raise £1.025bn in index-linked bonds secured against
future NHS funding to finance the redevelopment of three London hospitals -
At Barts, the Royal London and the London Chest Hospital.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Financial Times 4 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
The Government has insisted that patient care remains of
paramount importance in the NHS amid reports of secret plans to ration GP
referrals and save money. According to The Times, patients are being denied
appointments with consultants in a systematic bid to ration care and balance
the books. It cited leaked documents showing that, despite the Government's
Patient Choice agenda,
barriers are being erected, limiting GPs' rights to refer people to
consultants. The documents reveal plans by health trusts across London to
establish panels to "monitor" how many patients are referred to hospital by
doctors, it reports. Local trusts have been told they must cut their
referral rates to those of the lowest 10% nationally - saving £25 million a
year in the capital, it added. Consultant-to-consultant referrals are also
being limited, denying many patients a second opinion. Further targeted are
patients who use accident and emergency services for care that could be
provided by GPs. The Times reports that emergency care staff in A and E
departments will "redirect" up to 70% of patients back to GPs or walk-in
centres. And payment will be withheld from hospitals who treat patients who
should have been sent to GPs. The leaked paper, Pan London Demand Management
Arrangements, is still in draft and was produced by the London Transition
Team, led by senior NHS manager John Bacon.
Friday April 7, 2006 8:23 AM |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Secret plan to
ration patient care. Patients are being denied appointments with
consultants in a systematic attempt to ration care and save the NHS money. The
leaked document - 'Pan
London Demand Management Arrangements 06-07' produced by the London
Transition Team, led by John Bacon, a senior NHS manager - shows that while
ministers promise patients choice, a series of barriers are being erected
limiting GPs' rights to refer people to consultants. Health trusts across
London have drawn up plans to establish panels that will monitor how many
patients are referred to hospital by GPs. Trusts have been told that they must
cut GP referral rates to those of the lowest 10%, saving £25m a year.
Consultant-to-consultant referrals are also being limited, in many cases
denying patients a second opinion. A&
E departments are being told to "redirect" 40-70% of patients back to
GPs or walk-in centres. Hospitals that treat people who ought to have been
sent to their GPs will not be paid. The bureaucracy needed to screen all the
referrals will itself cost £1.6m. The Times says: "The language of the
document makes no pretence that this will improve care, and emphasises cost
savings throughout. 'It is imperative that London balances its books overall,'
the first paragraph says." The BMA says similar schemes are running in
Kent,
Oxfordshire,
Dorset,
Wiltshire,
Surrey, Sussex,
Cornwall,
Shropshire,
Suffolk,
Lancashire and
Yorkshire, as well as London. Jonathan Fielden, deputy chairman
of the BMA consultants committee, said: "It's clear that clinicians don't know
how these referral management systems aid improvements in clinical care. To
them they are purely cost-saving. The way they work is not transparent or
clear. If clinicians don't know, patients cannot know either. That certainly
flies in the face of the Government's Patient Choice agenda." Myfanwy Davies
and Glyn Elwyn, of the Centre for Health Services Research at Cardiff, said
the centres had "appeared overnight in an evidence-free zone".
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Times 7 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
A
dentist
has said he has been told to get rid of hundreds of NHS patients because
there is no longer funding for his practice. Dr Jaideep Prashar has 1,200
NHS patients at his clinic in Hampstead in north
London, which
opened in November. He claimed he was a victim of the government's new
dentists' contracts which were signed last week. The local Camden Primary
Care Trust (PCT) said Dr Prashar opened his practice without discussing
funding.
BBC
Online 9 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Cash-strapped NHS
hospital clinging to life. As well as cutting 480 jobs, the Royal Free
Hospital in
Hampstead has already lost 127 beds, and another 84 will go soon. That
amounts to seven wards.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Independent 9 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Hospital's deal
with US group will boost income. University College
London Hospital
foundation trust has formed a joint venture with Hospital Corporation of
America to provide an international cancer centre that will boost the
hospital's private patient income. HCA is the US's largest private hospital
operator, which runs more than 270 hospitals and surgery centres worldwide,
including six private hospitals in London. HCA will take over private
patient operations on the 15th floor of the new UCLH tower in London's
Euston Road to provide a specialist blood and bone cancer centre aimed at
international and UK patients. The centre will draw on UCLH's teaching
hospital expertise. HCA will lease the space, pay for services and share
profits with UCLH, with NHS patients being given access to the services at
standard NHS prices. The FT says "such joint ventures might, in time,
provide a way round the cap on private patient income that NHS foundation
trusts face. Under the rules, they are not allowed to earn a higher
proportion of income from patients than they had when they acquired
foundation trust status."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Financial Times 13 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Half of London trusts on red alert over finance recovery plans. Almost
half of London's
acute and primary care trusts have been given a red traffic light rating in
an assessment of their financial recovery plans. Traffic light ratings have
been given to acute and PCTs to work out which are eligible to apply to
borrow funding from London's risk pool, £300m of which was created by
top-slicing all PCTs by 3%. Only about a dozen organisations have been rated
'green', meaning that they had put forward credible plans which would allow
them to hit balance next year. A further 23 were amber, meaning that they
had delivered plans but these had been assessed as 'not deliverable', while
25 had been flagged as 'red', unable to provide a plan for balance or target
deficit recovery.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 13 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
4 |
|
Huge referral cuts could be enforced. London's transitional leadership
is drawing up proposals that could require primary care and acute trusts to
make dramatic cuts to their
referral rates to meet 'best practice' requirements. Draft proposals are
understood to suggest that cutting referral rates to those of the lowest 10%
nationally would save £25m across
London, and to
recommend that PCTs which cannot achieve this set up 'review panels' of GPs
and other clinicians by specialty. The guidance from the team running the
London cluster, headed by John Bacon, stressed: "PCTs will expect trusts'
co-operation in these circumstances. In particular, trusts should not assume
'referral' as 'authorisation to treat'."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 13 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Four
children's hospitals have warned health ministers they will have to cut
specialist services because of miscalculations in the new
payments-by-results system championed by Tony Blair as part of his NHS
reforms. The threat to specialist services for children was revealed by the
Liberal Democrats, who released papers showing children's trusts have told
ministers they will have to cut services because they claim they are facing
a £22m shortfall in the new financial year. The letter was sent by the
chairs and chief executives of
Great Ormond Street,
Alder Hey,
Birmingham and
Sheffield hospitals. Together the four hospitals form the National
Children's Health Alliance, and they claim the proposed funding will damage
the provision of cardiac surgery, neurosurgery and spinal surgery.
Patrick Wintour, political editor
Tuesday April 18, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Children's hospitals 'at risk' from
tariff system. Four
children's hospitals have warned health ministers they will have to cut
specialist services because of miscalculations in the new payments by
results system that will see them face a £22m shortfall in this financial
year. The letter to ministers was sent by the chairs and chief executives of
Great Ormond Street,
Alder Hey,
Birmingham and
Sheffield hospitals, who together form the National Children's Health
Alliance. It says: "We are extremely concerned that vital specialist
paediatric capacity, particularly in surgical specialities, will be lost at
regional and national level this year, which will lead to public concern.
The new opportunities presented by choice and through payment-by-results
should be benefiting young people and children, but quite the reverse seems
to be the case. Our trusts are increasingly the only place of choice for
parents whose children need specialist paediatric care." The trusts blame
the "inaccurate and highly insensitive tariff" under payments by results. To
make ends meet, they say, they will have to identify those services on which
they stand to lose most money and stop providing them. Obvious candidates
include heart, brain and spinal surgery. "We are extremely concerned that
vital specialist paediatric capacity, particularly in surgical specialties,
will be lost at regional and national levels this year, which will lead to
public concern."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Times
18 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Up to a third of
dentists won't sign NHS contract. Nearly a third of dentists in some
parts of England have refused to sign new NHS contracts - contradicting a
recent statement by Tony Blair that "about 90 to 95%" of dentists had signed
up. A leaked government document, showing exactly how many dentists in each
area have taken up the contracts, reveals that in the
south west, 29% of dentists have refused to sign up; in the
Thames
Valley, 15%; in
Hampshire, 18%; in
Yorkshire, 23%; and in the
West Midlands, 24%. In south-west
London, the
figure is 12%; in
Manchester, 11%; in
Kent,
14%; and in
Dorset, 15%. In
Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire, 23% have not signed up. Of the
9,419 contracts offered in England, 1,096 have been rejected, including some
covering more than one dentist - a national average of 12% more than Mr
Blair's claim.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Telegraph 16 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
A leading NHS trust has been plunged into financial crisis
after managers failed to enter at least £6m in unpaid bills on to the books,
according to a report due to be published by the Audit Commission today. The
discovery of a stockpile of unaccounted invoices was made after a senior
manager went on maternity leave and her replacement began sifting through
the files at
Kensington and Chelsea primary care trust, the trust's former chairman
said last night. The auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers will say in a public
interest report on the trust's financial standing that it experienced "a
major failure in corporate, particularly financial, governance". They
conclude that the trust is unlikely to meet its statutory duty to break
even. John Carvel, social affairs editor
Friday April 21, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Concern over
Gateshead 'breach'.
Gateshead Health foundation trust 'might be in
significant breach of its authorisation', according to independent regulator
Monitor, which has has 'serious concerns as to the trust's liquidity'. The
trust is 'stretching its creditors' and is not 'adhering to best practice' in
paying back lenders. Meanwhile, University College
London Hospitals foundation trust is failing to operate 'in an effective,
efficient and economic way', according to Monitor. The regulator has so far
decided against intervention, but the trust has to submit a recovery plan by
the end of April that must show the 2006-07 deficit will not exceed £10m, and
that it will have broken even and improved its financial risk rating from 1 to
3 on a scale of 1-5 by April 2008.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 20 April 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Hospital delay
costs NHS £50m. The NHS trust that is responsible for Bart's and the
Royal London
hospitals says that the delays to the project caused when Patricia Hewitt
ordered a last minute review have added an extra £1.5m to the annual fee
that it will pay the project developers. The trust calculates that the delay
will cost around £50m over the life of the project. It expects to pay up to
20% of its annual projected income to meet the PFI fee.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Telegraph
21 April 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Doctors' protest.
GPs from Limehouse assembled on the steps of the Royal
London Hospital
at midday on Wednesday to protest against NHS reforms in an event organised
by Keep Our NHS Public. Maggie Falshaw, manager of the Limehouse Practice,
said: "We are pleased that the rebuild of the London hospital is going
ahead. However, because it's going through on a PFI scheme it will be very
expensive. Once the London Hospital is rebuilt there will be two empty
floors in the London Hospital, and one empty floor at Barts Hospital,
because they won't be able to afford to fit those floors out. Experience of
PFI schemes in other parts of the country shows that it's an expensive way
of rebuilding. The NHS leases the hospital from the private company, then
has the opportunity to buy the hospital at a later date - so it's basically
paying for the hospital twice."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of The Wharf 21 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Three leading NHS hospitals risk being downgraded for failing to give
information on the
death
rates of their heart surgery patients, the Guardian has learned. The
trusts are the only ones in the UK not to have provided key data for the
Healthcare Commission, which has been gathering information on mortality
rates linked to individual surgeons. The information will be published today
on a groundbreaking website designed to enable heart patients and their
families the chance to make informed choices about where to have surgery.
Last night one of Britain's top heart surgeons warned that the commission
might penalise the three trusts - St Mary's in Paddington, west
London,
Glenfields in
Leicester, and Morriston in Swansea - by
downgrading them in their annual performance ratings. "I think it is utterly
unacceptable in a modern health service that units no longer have the
discipline or facility to collect good outcome data," said Sir Bruce Keogh,
president of the Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons. After a Guardian
investigation last year, the commission asked all hospitals performing heart
surgery to provide data on operations such as bypass grafts and aortic valve
replacements. The aim was to help patients assess a surgeon's track record
before having an operation. In a historic move the commission will publish
data on death rates at almost all the 33 hospitals performing this complex
work in England and Wales. It will disclose risk-adjusted mortality rates
for individual surgeons at 17 cardiac units, and the aggregated results for
13 units. John Carvel and Sarah Boseley
Wednesday April 26, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Save Chase Farm
group takes to road in ambulance. The Save Chase Farm Hospital campaign
group - fighting to save threatened A&
E and other major services at the hospital - have been touring the
borough in an ambulance. The group are fielding 9 candidates in the local
election for Enfield
Council, where the Tories currently have a 15 seat majority. It is
conceivable that they could come out of the race holding the balance of
power. Candidate Robin Somerville said: "We need to make sure that as many
people as possible know about the threats to services and what they can do
to help prevent the cuts. Amber, our campaign ambulance, is an eye-catching
way of getting close to the public. She looks terrific sporting our logo and
slogans."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Enfield Independent 28 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Making a stand
for pensioners. A former mayor of
Enfield who left
the Labour Party disillusioned by the war in Iraq is standing as an
Independent candidate in the local elections to stand up for pensioners.
Stanley Carter said he would fiercely oppose the closure of departments at
Chase Farm Hospital. "Many of the illnesses to which older people are prone
require prompt attention and a journey to Barnet General Hospital could
prove fatal," he said.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Enfield
Independent 28 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
'Dark forces' harm commissioning. Primary care trusts' unwillingness to
let go of local NHS purse-strings is scuppering GPs' attempts to get
practice-based commissioning off the ground. GPs are reporting trusts
adopting a heavy-handed approach, including insisting specific doctors take
clinical lead posts and rejecting proposed groupings of practices. Some PCTs
have also demanded GP commissioning groups use a compulsory referral
management system. In
London, budgets
for commissioning have been set at 2004 levels and elsewhere PCTs have been
advised to top-slice 3-5 per cent from budgets to
act as a contingency fund. Dr Hamish Meldrum, GPC chair, said there was 'in-
creasing scepticism, anger and frustration about the implementation' of
commissioning.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 28 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Salary hikes
for health trust chiefs. Chief executives at
debt-ridden NHS trusts have been awarded
pay rises up to 12 times the
rate of inflation. The average pay for a hospital chief executive last year
was £125,000. The Sunday Telegraph survey of pay reports, compiled by the
analysts Incomes Data Services for the financial years 2003-04 and 2004-05
and based on audited NHS accounts, found that. among the largest pay awards
was that given to Derek Smith, the chief executive of
Hammersmith
Hospitals NHS Trust, which has a deficit of £15 million and is shedding 300
jobs through freezing vacancies. He received a 35% increase in 2003-04,
taking his pay from £157,500 to £214,000. His 2005 salary was £197,500,
meaning he enjoyed a 25% rise over two years. At University Hospital of
North
Staffordshire, the former chief executive David Cowley, who left the
trust last summer, enjoyed an 18% pay rise in 2004-05, from £127,700 to
£150,700. The trust is facing a £15m deficit and has announced 1,000 job
cuts. At the Royal West
Sussex Hospital, the chief executive Andrew Liles received a 16%
increase in 2004-05, from £90,000 to £105,000. The trust is facing a deficit
of £13.9 million. At James Paget Healthcare NHS Trust in
Norfolk, the chief executive David Hill received a 16.9% increase, from
£118,000 to £138,000. There is no deficit, but 100 jobs are likely to go
through a vacancies freeze. 115 executive directors of NHS trusts are
flouting Department of Health guidance on openness and refusing to reveal
their salaries, citing the Data Protection Act.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Telegraph 30 April 2006 |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
5 |
The politics
column - Allyson Pollock. In the New Statesman's main political column,
Allyson Pollock writes: "According to Patricia Hewitt the NHS has had its
best year ever. So why is the Royal College of Nursing threatening
industrial action over cuts and
closures, and why did the annual conference of Unison, traditional
Labour supporters, greet the secretary of state with heckling?
In her words, "the NHS must
modernise or die".
So why, from
Surrey to
Manchester and from
Gateshead to
Shropshire, are local people banding into hospital action groups and "Keep
our NHS public" campaigns in an effort to defend the health service | |