|
The summary articles in the table below related to the strategic health
authority area are copied from the following pages, indicated in the table by
key numbers.
-
Charges
-
Construction projects
-
Resource shortfall Sources
-
Treatment approval or not
- Withdrawal of Local Facilities -
Sources
Other
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Summary articles |
| |
|
|
|
|
An inquiry into the botched operations of gynaecologist Rodney Ledward
[William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, Kent] is expected this week to be severely critical of doctors and managers who knew for years that he was unfit to be operating. . Guardian, 30 May 2000
|
| |
|
|
|
|
The Medway trust in Gillingham, Kent, was named yesterday by the
Department of Health as being way above the national average for patients
readmitted as emergencies within 28 days of being released from hospital,
with an increase of 18% in the past year. Guardian
Wednesday February 20, 2002 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Where the treatment centres will be. The health secretary, John Reid, today
announced details of the government's controversial programme of privately run
fast-track diagnostic and treatment centres, and a number of new mobile
ophthalmology units. This guide explains where they will be.
Friday September 12, 2003 [South-west peninsula (Mercury Health Ltd),
Lincolnshire (Mercury Health Ltd), Horton hospital, north Oxford (Mercury Health
Ltd), North-east Yorks (Mercury Health Ltd), Southampton (Mercury Health Ltd),
Northumberland (Mercury Health Ltd), East Berkshire (Slough, Bracknell,
Maidenhead and Windsor/Ascot) (Mercury Health Ltd), Didcot, Oxfordshire (Mercury
Health Ltd), Ashford, Surrey (Mercury Health Ltd), Maidstone (Care
UK Afrox), Barlborough Links, Nottinghamshire (Care UK Afrox), Derriford,
Plymouth (Care UK Afrox), Chase Farm, Barnet, London (Anglo Canadian), King
George hospital, Redbridge (Anglo Canadian), Royal National throat nose and ear
hospital, Kings Cross, London (Anglo Canadian), Bradford (Nations Healthcare),
Burton (Nations Healthcare), Daventry (Birkdale Clinic), Trafford, Greater
Manchester (Netcare UK), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore (New York
Presbyterian), Shepton Mallet, Somerset (New York Presbyterian).
Two mobile units will offer ophthalmology services in the following areas:
Cheshire and Merseyside (Netcare UK), Cumbria and Lancashire (Netcare UK),
Horton, Oxfordshire (Netcare UK), Wycombe, Bucks (Netcare UK), North Tyneside
(Netcare UK), South-west Oxfordshire (Netcare UK), North-west peninsula (Netcare
UK), Dorset/Somerset (Netcare UK), Kent/Medway (Netcare UK), Hants and Isle of
Wight (Netcare UK), Surrey and Sussex (Netcare UK), Thames Valley (Netcare UK)] |
| |
|
|
|
|
The government yesterday named and shamed hospital trusts where patients
were most at risk of catching one of the most feared superbugs as part of a
more aggressive campaign to reduce hospital-acquired infections in England.
James Meikle, health correspondent
Saturday December 6, 2003 The Guardian [Acute NHS trusts with the highest rates of MRSA per 1,000 bed days for 2002/03: Lewisham Hospital 0.24, Epsom & St Helier 0.24,
Dartford & Gravesham 0.24, Queen Mary's Sidcup 0.25, Countess of Chester Hospital 0.26, East & North Hertfordshire 0.26, West Middlesex University 0.27, Barnet & Chase Farm Hospitals 0.28, Ealing Hospital 0.29, North Middlesex Hospital 0.30, Weston Area Health 0.30
] |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Banks and property developers made windfall profits of £73m by refinancing
one of the Labour government's first privately financed hospitals, the 989-bed
Norfolk and Norwich hospital, the National Audit Office reveals in a report
published today. The windfall is the third to be disclosed by parliament's
financial watchdog after complaints from MPs and the public. The other two are
Fazakerley prison in Liverpool and the Dartford and Gravesham hospital. The
report says that funding for five other privately financed hospitals - South
Buckinghamshire, Calderdale, North Durham, Bromley and South Manchester - could
also yield windfall profits for developers. David Hencke, Westminster
correspondent
Friday June 10, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Trust needs
help, says Audit Commission. An Audit Commission public interest report
has found that Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust has a cumulative
deficit of £16.97m, which it will be unable to rectify without "very
significant" help.
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of
Public Finance 27 January 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Operation
go-slow in Kent. South West Kent and Maidstone Weald PCTs have become the
latest to tell doctors not to carry out any new elective operations or
outpatient appointments apart from in the most urgent cases until the next
financial year.
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online 30
January 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS trust
refutes overspend claim. Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust has
defended itself after the Audit Commission said it has no plan to clear its
£17m deficit. The trust says the deficit is carried over and the result of
budget reductions.
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online 30
January 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
South East NHS
trusts owe £110m. Of the 46 NHS trusts in Kent, Sussex and Surrey, 31 said
they had overspent by between £267,000 and £32m, with only seven reporting a
budget surplus. Surrey and Sussex Healthcare Trust has the biggest deficit. It
has cut 300 jobs, postponed routine surgery and reduced the number of
operating theatres in use. Swale PCT in Kent, with a £7.8m deficit, has axed
thirty jobs and one ward at a community hospital.
Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online 30
January 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
One of the government's most successful flagship hospitals has been forced
to ban non-emergency surgery after doctors cut long waiting lists by carrying
out 'too many' operations. Hundreds of patients have been told by Darent
Valley hospital in Dartford, Kent, they will now have to wait longer for their
operations. Surgeons performing gynaecological, urological and orthopaedic
procedures have been told by local health officials that they have
'over-performed'. Jo Revill, health editor
Sunday February 5, 2006 The Observer |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Cost-saving
surgery ban is "short sighted". The widespread practice of delaying
operations until the new financial year to reduce current deficits means PCTs
will have to pay doctors for extra lists, or send patients to private
hospitals to prevent them breaching waiting list targets after April. Some of
the worst examples include Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, where 100
patients with appointments for elective surgery - some of which were booked as
far back as October with pre-operative assessments - have had their operations
cancelled. Medway NHS Trust will not give admission dates to any patients who
joined the waiting list after 1 November until after April. A consultant said:
"This time next year the trust will be in an even worse position, as it will
have spent a good whack of next year's budget on waiting list initiatives to
get this year's patients done in time." In both Medway and Dartford and
Gravesham the referral system has been changed. Previously referrals were
categorised as "urgent", "soon" and "routine", but the "soon" category has
been removed and most of these patients are now treated as routine. In Essex,
Colchester PCT has forbidden orthopaedic surgeons from treating conditions
uncovered after a referral for a different problem - patients must be
re-referred by their GP. Surgeons at Essex Rivers Healthcare NHS Trust have
branded the demand unethical and refused to co-operate. In Kent orthopaedic,
urology and gynaecology patients have been removed from waiting lists for
Darent Valley Hospital on PCT instructions. They include patients who have
already been given dates and attended pre-assessment clinics. The affected
patients, who are selected by a non-medic, are referred back to their GPs -
who have been to told to direct all queries to Dartford, Gravesham and Swanley
PCT. A consultant at the hospital said: "It is not clear where responsibility
now lies for these patients." Dr Jonathan Fielden, deputy chairman of the
BMA's consultants committee, said of the general situation: "This is not the
best financial management and goes against the principle of putting clinical
need first." Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of Hospital Doctor 10 February 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Healthy shopping.
East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust has launched a scheme to give check-ups by
midwives to expectant mothers at their local Sainsbury's supermarket.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Times 3 March 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
'Bored'
gynaecologist blasts NHS. A gynaecologist at the Medway Maritime
Hospital in Kent has said he is being left to "twiddle his thumbs" and do
crosswords because his hospital cannot afford more surgery. David Penman
says public money is being wasted at the hospital, which has a £1m deficit
and is delaying procedures until the new financial year.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online 14 March 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Community Hospitals at risk in Kent and Medway
SHA according to
Public Finance 17 March 2006:
Sittingbourne Memorial Hospital
Edenbridge and District War Memorial Hospital |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Trust 'faces £35m
debt' next year. The East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust has predicted that
NHS reforms could push it into the red by up to £35m next year, resulting in
job cuts and bed closures. Chief executive David Astley said: "We are facing
a reduction in our income of approaching £20m as a result of the new tariff
structure being introduced into the NHS, and that was on top of a challenge
we were already aware of, of around £15m for next year."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online
23 March
2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Consultant's
dismay over NHS cash. A consultant microbiologist has spoken out about
fears over East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust's impending cost-cutting measures.
Graeme Calver said: "We're talking about 10% less staff next year than we've
got today… I really don't see how we can absorb this, something's got to
give." He said MRSA testing in his department was at risk: "We have seen
significant increases in expenditure in our department on testing for MRSA,
to meet the government targets of MRSA reduction. We were anticipating we
would get extra money for that this year but we're actually going to get
less."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 31 March 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Hospital trust to
lose 160 jobs. Medway NHS Trust has confirmed it is shedding 160 posts.
It hopes to avoid compulsory redundancies.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 4 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Hewitt has
visited only 11 hospitals in a year. Patricia Hewitt has visited only 11
NHS hospitals - and only two in 2006 - despite being Health Secretary for
almost a year. A Department of Health spokesman pointed out that Hewitt had
visited independent sector treatment centres. Meanwhile the Medway NHS Trust
in Gillingham, Kent, became the latest health authority to announce that up
to 160 jobs will go to save £11m. The total number of jobs lost in the NHS
stands at 5,130.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Telegraph 4 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
The mood of crisis in the NHS deepened yesterday with the
announcement of 720 further job losses at a hospital trust in the Midlands
and the resignation of a trust chief executive in the north-west, with a
£475,000 payoff.
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS trust said it would have to shed 720
jobs over the next 12 months to balance the books after accumulating
deficits worth £31.5m over several years. The staff affected will include
nurses, doctors and administrative workers at hospitals in Worcester,
Redditch and Kidderminster, where Labour lost a safe parliamentary seat in
2001 due to local protest at the downgrading of NHS facilities. The
job losses bring the total announced by trusts in England over the past five
weeks to more than 6,000. The toll this week included 160
jobs at
Medway trust in Kent, 400 at
Surrey and Sussex Healthcare trust and up to 300 at Royal United
hospitals in
Bath. Meanwhile Pennine Acute, the largest NHS trust in the north-west
of England, with hospitals in
Bury,
north Manchester, Oldham and Rochdale, announced the early retirement of
its chief executive, Chris Appleby, who was under pressure to go after a
vote of no confidence from the trust's doctors last summer. An independent
inquiry into the trust by Sir George Alberti, former president of the Royal
College of Physicians, found a "lethal mixture" of suspect leadership styles
and poor relations between doctors and managers. Other NHS developments
included a report from the Audit Commission warning of serious concerns
about the financial position of
George Eliot hospital trust in
Nuneaton. It had "deteriorated to such an extent that it cannot be
managed simply through local measures", said the auditors,
PricewaterhouseCoopers. And in
Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, NHS managers said a new multimillion-pound
mental health ward may never be opened because there was not the money
to run it. John Carvel and Les Reid
Friday April 7, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Secret plan to
ration patient care. Patients are being denied appointments with
consultants in a systematic attempt to ration care and save the NHS money. The
leaked document - 'Pan
London Demand Management Arrangements 06-07' produced by the London
Transition Team, led by John Bacon, a senior NHS manager - shows that while
ministers promise patients choice, a series of barriers are being erected
limiting GPs' rights to refer people to consultants. Health trusts across
London have drawn up plans to establish panels that will monitor how many
patients are referred to hospital by GPs. Trusts have been told that they must
cut GP referral rates to those of the lowest 10%, saving £25m a year.
Consultant-to-consultant referrals are also being limited, in many cases
denying patients a second opinion. A&
E departments are being told to "redirect" 40-70% of patients back to
GPs or walk-in centres. Hospitals that treat people who ought to have been
sent to their GPs will not be paid. The bureaucracy needed to screen all the
referrals will itself cost £1.6m. The Times says: "The language of the
document makes no pretence that this will improve care, and emphasises cost
savings throughout. 'It is imperative that London balances its books overall,'
the first paragraph says." The BMA says similar schemes are running in
Kent,
Oxfordshire,
Dorset,
Wiltshire,
Surrey, Sussex,
Cornwall,
Shropshire,
Suffolk,
Lancashire and
Yorkshire, as well as London. Jonathan Fielden, deputy chairman
of the BMA consultants committee, said: "It's clear that clinicians don't know
how these referral management systems aid improvements in clinical care. To
them they are purely cost-saving. The way they work is not transparent or
clear. If clinicians don't know, patients cannot know either. That certainly
flies in the face of the Government's Patient Choice agenda." Myfanwy Davies
and Glyn Elwyn, of the Centre for Health Services Research at Cardiff, said
the centres had "appeared overnight in an evidence-free zone".
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Times 7 April 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Trust
approves moves to save £35m. East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust, which runs
hospitals in Folkestone, Margate, Dover, Ashford and Canterbury, plans to
cut 160 beds as part of efforts to save £35m. The trust has said it is being
forced to make the savings because it is getting £20m less from the
government.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 11 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Up to a third of
dentists won't sign NHS contract. Nearly a third of dentists in some
parts of England have refused to sign new NHS contracts - contradicting a
recent statement by Tony Blair that "about 90 to 95%" of dentists had signed
up. A leaked government document, showing exactly how many dentists in each
area have taken up the contracts, reveals that in the
south west, 29% of dentists have refused to sign up; in the
Thames
Valley, 15%; in
Hampshire, 18%; in
Yorkshire, 23%; and in the
West Midlands, 24%. In south-west
London, the
figure is 12%; in
Manchester, 11%; in
Kent,
14%; and in
Dorset, 15%. In
Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire, 23% have not signed up. Of the
9,419 contracts offered in England, 1,096 have been rejected, including some
covering more than one dentist - a national average of 12% more than Mr
Blair's claim.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Telegraph 16 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
A patient
occupied a
hospital bed for more than four years after doctors decided the person
was ready to leave, it emerged yesterday. The cost of the patient's care at
an unnamed hospital in
Maidstone
and Tunbridge Wells NHS trust is estimated to have been
more than £300,000. Paul Lewis
Tuesday May 2, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Hospital
announces 200 job cuts. Staff at St Richard's Hospital in
Chichester were
told on Wednesday that 10% of the workforce - or 200 jobs - would go over
the next three years. The Royal West
Sussex NHS Trust said it would try to keep redundancies to a minimum but
some may be necessary. The trust has overspent by a total of £40m and had a
£14m deficit last year. The St Richard's cuts are the latest to affect
hospitals in the South East, where more than 1,000 job losses have been
announced in the last two months. Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust,
which manages Crawley Hospital and East Surrey Hospital, has said 400 jobs
will go; East Sussex NHS Hospitals Trust, which runs the Conquest Hospital
in Hastings and Eastbourne District General, has axed up to 250 jobs; Up to
160 jobs are to go at the
Medway
Maritime Hospital in Gillingham, Kent; Brighton and Sussex University
Hospitals NHS Trust plans to lose 325 jobs; East Kent Hospitals Trust warned
of possible cuts to claw back a £35m deficit.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
BBC
Online 4 May 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Consultant
quits over op delays. A gynaecologist who spoke out over claims he was
left with nothing to do because his hospital delayed non-urgent surgery has
resigned. David Penman faced disciplinary action after saying
public money was being wasted through the delays
at Kent's £1m-in-debt
Medway
Maritime Hospital. He resigned because he could "no longer tolerate the way
the NHS is being run". Mr Penman spoke out in March after the hospital
imposed minimum waiting times of nine weeks for outpatient appointments and
20 weeks for non-urgent operations. Upon resigning he said: "I come from a
long line of doctors and I was brought up to act and behave to my patients
with honour, honesty and respect and all I see is spin, lies and deceit from
the management. I don't feel I can work in a system like that. It is an
important principle not to allow organisations to effectively gag people
who, for the most honourable reasons, are wishing to
expose dishonourable
actions to public scrutiny." The hospital is continuing with
disciplinary action against him despite the fact he has resigned.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 5 June 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Help health
workers stop the sell off of NHS Logistics. NHS Logistics has been
targeted for privatisation by the New Labour government under the guise of
an "arms length body". But Unison's
Maidstone
branch, along with four other small Unison branches, in
Alfreton,
Normanton,
Runcorn and
Bury St Edmunds, are fighting the plans and are consulting their members
for strike action. A recent consultative ballot saw 92% vote in favour. Over
2,000 people have signed a petition against the sell off, and now first
rally in Maidstone for over ten years has been organised, under the banner
of the national organisation Keep Our NHS Public. The rally is set to take
place on Saturday 1 July, in Maidstone's Brenchley Gardens next to Maidstone
East railway station. The rally will be joined by those fighting over 300
jobs losses in the Maidstone Hospital Trust and 160 at Medway.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Socialist Worker 7 June 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Ministers miss
key deadline for PBC as chaos dogs scheme. Practice-based commissioning
is falling way behind schedule, with more than half of GPs shunning the
scheme due to a catalogue of problems. Only two out of five GPs have so far
signed up amid doubts over their ability to keep savings and unreasonable
demands being set by PCTs desperate to save money. Even those GPs who have
agreed local plans are claiming the process has been a worthless exercise. A
Pulse survey of 61 PCTs covering 2,038 practices has found just 38% of GPs
had agreed a local plan with their PCT by the end of June. The government
target by this time was 100%. Despite having come nowhere near the target,
health minister Lord Warner said the fact 3,454 practices were involved
showed the NHS was "surging ahead" in adopting the Government's reforms. But
in Kent,
Hampshire,
Somerset and Dorset, no GPs had signed up.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 7 July 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
'Disastrous'
failings led to patient's death. A consultant launched a scathing attack
on his own hospital after an elderly woman brought in for a minor condition
died from blood poisoning. Hugh Evans said that the hospital's chief failure
had been to put Mrs Pruce on a ward where staff were not adequately trained
to treat urological conditions. And he said that at the time that was a
recurrent problem within the trust linked to efforts to meet waiting time
targets. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Kent
Messenger 20 July 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
160 hospital
jobs set to be axed. Employees at
Medway
Maritime Hospital have been sent letters about reducing staff. The NHS Trust
plans to cut 160 jobs to save money. Staff are being offered voluntary
reduction of hours or early retirement. The Trust has also put a freeze on
non-urgent recruitment. Other reductions will be achieved through natural
wastage as staff move on or retire.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Kent
Online 21 July 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Nursing students
in protest rally. Hundreds of trainee nurses have been protesting about
the freeze on NHS recruitment across the
South
East. They estimate that only 20% of healthcare students are likely to
find employment due to lack of funding.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 24 July 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Hospital petition
taken to Downing Street. A 13,000-signature petition presented to 10
Downing Street is the latest milestone in the Save Buckland Hospital
campaign. In addition an eminent consultant, with 25 years' experience, is
preparing to officially challenge the consultation process on where health
services in Dover should be provided. The petition was presented for the
attention of Tony Blair by hospital campaigner Pauline Major and MP Gwyn
Prosser. Since the
Dover
Project consultations began, Mrs Major has taken to the streets, fearful
that the review of services is another way of saying services will be cut
from Buckland. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Dover
Mercury 7 September 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS will
spend £172m on private consultants. NHS trusts will spend £172 million
on private management consultants this year despite being in the grip of the
health service's biggest ever financial crisis. Figures today reveal that
spending on the small army of advisers is now almost twice the £93 million
that hospitals and surgeries were paying out two years ago. The huge
increase comes at a time when hospitals across the country are cutting
thousands of jobs after trusts ran up deficits totalling £1.27 billion last
year. Despite the huge financial pressures, it emerged that many of the
hospitals that spend the most on external advisers are axing hundreds of
jobs because they have plunged deep into the red. Maidstone and Tunbridge
Wells NHS Trust in
Kent,
for example, is expected to spend about £3.5 million on external consultants
this year - even though the trust has a £16 million deficit and has
announced 300 job losses. There is a similar picture at the United
Lincolnshire
Hospitals NHS Trust, which has cut 320 jobs in an attempt to tackle an £11
million deficit. However, the trust is set to spend just under £2.7 million
on outside experts this year. Mansfield District PCT in Nottinghamshire
spent £1,300 on the "design and facilitation of the prescribing team's
away-day". This year, the trust is expected to spend about £175,612 on
advisers. Ashfield PCT, Notts, which will spend about £150,000 this year,
has paid for advice on "branding" as well as the "preparation and
facilitation of governance time-out". Burton Hospitals NHS Trust,
Staffs, said it had spent £58,000 for advice on "publicity". The Robert
Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Trust in Shropshire paid £33,000 on public
relations and a further £16,000 on board training.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Telegraph
12 September 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Campaign to
save homeopathy unit. Supporters of a
Kent
clinic which is one of just five in the UK to provide homeopathic treatment
on the NHS have met to fight plans to close it. The Homeopathic Hospital, in
Tunbridge Wells, treats up to 1,000 patients a year but the PCT which runs
it needs to save £160,000.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 20 September 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Health inspectors announced an inquiry yesterday into an outbreak of the
hospital infection Clostridium difficile which contributed to the deaths of
20 patients at an NHS trust in
Kent.
The Healthcare Commission said C difficile had emerged as the most serious
hospital-acquired infection, causing more deaths than the superbug MRSA. Its
inspectors will look into an outbreak at Maidstone hospital, where 136
patients were diagnosed with the infection between April and June. Maidstone
and Tunbridge Wells NHS trust said the infection was the definite cause of
death of six patients. Another 14 died due to a range of medical problems
including C difficile, but the infection was not deemed to be the main cause
of death. A further four had C difficile, but it was unlikely to have led to
their deaths. The commission said the infection was the major infectious
cause of diarrhoea acquired in hospitals in the UK and may cause fatal
inflammation of the walls of the intestine. In July the commission published
the findings of an inquiry into three outbreaks of C difficile at
Stoke
Mandeville hospital near Aylesbury which may have killed at least 41
older people since 2003. John Carvel, social affairs editor
Wednesday September 27, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
'We are striking to
keep the NHS public'. Workers at NHS Logistics staged two 24-hour strikes
over the past week. Paul Harper, Unison union branch secretary at the
Maidstone
depot, said: "Why is Mr Blair handing a company that works so well to private
sector leeches ? It seems like Blair
wants to privatise the whole NHS. However, I don't see Gordon Brown as the
answer. Last weekend Brown floated the idea of an independent board to run the
NHS. Who's going to be on the board ?
People like DHL ? Many of those who
are striking at NHS Logistics were Labour supporters. Some are Labour members
who have talked about cutting their membership cards up. I'm not sure anyone
there is going to support Labour anymore. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Socialist
Worker 30 September 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
The true scale of Britain's hospital superbug problems emerged today as a
leading hospital trust admitted that a 'hypervirulent' infection had claimed
the lives of at least 49 patients - and possibly as many as 78 people - in
the space of nine months. The superbug Clostridium difficile (C. difficile),
which can cause severe illness and death in patients who have undergone
surgery, appears to be at unprecedented levels. It has turned into a more
virulent strain, ironically as a result of antibiotics commonly prescribed
to fight other infections. The increase in cases is partly due to dirty
wards, but also to a shortage of beds. The bacterium has also become more
deadly because it has mutated genetically, becoming resistant to other
treatments. Three hospitals in
Leicester admitted yesterday that the bug is likely to have caused 28
patients' deaths and contributed to another 21 since the beginning of this
year. A further 29 suspicious cases have been referred to the coroner. One
of the affected hospitals lies in the constituency of the Health Secretary,
Patricia Hewitt, who has tried to prioritise infection control within the
NHS. It emerged last week that at least 20 patients are thought to have died
during an outbreak in Kent earlier this year as a resilient strain of C.
difficile spread across the country. The Healthcare Commission, the NHS's
independent inspection body, is to hold an inquiry into the outbreak at
Maidstone
Hospital, when 136 patients were diagnosed with the infection over a
three-month period. According to the commission, C. difficile is the major
infectious cause of diarrhoea acquired in UK hospitals. It can also lead to
fevers, severe inflammation and death in around 5 per cent of cases. More
than 51,000 patients in England were found to be carrying the infection last
year, with experts warning that it is now more of a danger than MRSA. The
use of detergents may also unwittingly have spread the infection. It is
thought the chemicals used on floors and equipment may encourage the
creation of bacterial spores that are much more resistant to attack. The
only answer appears to be steam-cleaning wards and immediate isolation of
infected patients, which will make it harder for hospitals to meet waiting
list targets. Jo Revill, health editor
Sunday October 1, 2006 The Observer |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Doctors to slow down treatment to save money.
Hospitals are being told not to treat patients "too promptly" because
improvements made in meeting Government targets are costing too much money.
GPs have been told not to refer non-urgent cases for hospital appointments
within 8 weeks, and hospital doctors have been told not to provide
in-patient or day-case operations within 20 weeks. A letter to all chief
executives of primary care trusts and hospitals in
Surrey, Sussex and
Kent,
from the health authority, NHS South
East Coast, also tells hospitals that "capacity should be reduced" in
specialities where many outpatients are being seen within the eight-week
rule. This raises the prospect of cuts in doctors' and nurses' posts, not
replacing people who leave and transferring staff to other duties. The
rationing of patient care is a means of saving money in a health region
which last year had the biggest deficit in the country. This year the region
expects to be £94m in the red. The letter makes it clear that since the
"minimum" waiting times were set earlier this year, confusion has arisen.
The situation is another example of conflicting Labour health policies. The
gradual introduction of the electronic "Choose
and Book" system, which allows patients to choose their hospital and
book the first appointment at their GP's surgery, is a key Government health
policy. It seems to have revealed the availability of many, early outpatient
appointments in the most efficient departments. But after the latest
directive, hospitals in the South East are now fearful that if they
advertise appointments which are then given to patients who have waited less
than 8 weeks they will not be paid. As a result they have not been posting
all free slots on the Choose and Book computer. This destroys the purpose of
programme - to give patients a wide choice of hospitals. The letter lists 10
instructions to managers "in order to maximise the use of the Choose and
Book system and ensure that routine patients are not seen too promptly". It
confirms that the penalty for treating too many patients quickly will be no
payment for the treatments they provide.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Telegraph
23 November 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Hewitt backs maternity plans. Health secretary
Patricia Hewitt has quashed the objections of an overview and scrutiny
committee and upheld local NHS proposals on maternity services on the advice
of the independent reconfiguration panel. Hewitt asked the panel to advise
her on the proposals for
Calderdale and Huddersfield after they were referred to her by a joint
committee of local councillors. The IRP was set up in 2003 to provide advice
to the health secretary on contested proposals for health service change in
England. This was only the second referral, the first being in 2003 about
changes proposed in East
Kent. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 12 October 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Village GPs
bidding for NHS work. The building of a village health centre has led to
GP services in Staplehurst,
Kent,
being put out to tender. Public meetings have been held by NHS chiefs who
said they "were not able to hand over the keys to existing GPs". West Kent
Primary Care Trust manager Bill Miller said the process was not just about
money but was also about providing high quality services. "We are already
receiving good quality facilities in Staplehurst," he added. "We have public
money we have to spend and we have to go through a process." He said the
tendering process would take up to five months and the health centre would
open next year. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online
29 November 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Gagging
campaigners is not our aim, insist NHS chiefs. Health bosses have denied
they are out to stop campaigners speaking out over potentially controversial
changes in NHS services across
Kent.
The accusation of a cover up has come from a campaign group after an
internal briefing document produced by the newly-created South East Coast
Strategic Health Authority appeared to reveal how it is anxious to stop
public opposition disrupting plans that could follow from a wide-ranging
review of health care. Campaigners say Kent and Medway NHS chiefs are
desperate to avoid a repeat of the huge opposition there has been to health
cuts in neighbouring
Sussex and Surrey, where mass marches and well-organised campaigns have
taken place to try to protect local services after a similar review.
According to Health Emergency, the campaign group, the health authority
intends to conduct its public consultation over a wide-ranging review of
services under the slogan "Creating an NHS Fit for the Future". Part of the
leaked document reads: "It is urgent to complete these [meetings] before the
engagement process leads to heavy media coverage or any active campaigning
so that it is relevantly [sic] easy to recruit a representative sample of
the population who have not been affected by any previous public discourse."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Kent
Messenger 30 November 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Consultant speaks
out at NHS cuts. A senior consultant at a
Kent
hospital has resigned his managerial post because of plans to downgrade
services. Tony Hulse, a paediatrician for 18 years at Maidstone hospital
spoke out at a rally aimed at retaining acute services at the hospital which
was attended by around 2,500 people. The Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS
Trust, which has a deficit of £16.7m for this financial year, announced it
was cutting 300 posts in May. Cuts were originally to be made in agency and
bank staff but in June it emerged that the trust was planning to move
maternity services to Pembury hospital and blue-light ambulances would
switch from Maidstone Hospital to a new centre at Kent and Sussex Hospital
in Tunbridge Wells. Chief Executive of the trust, Rose Gibb, said the
proposals were down to a need to modernise services. Mr Hulse said: "The
trust has huge financial problems which can't be denied, but if you look
logically at where you should site your acute services they should be where
the largest population is." Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online
4 December 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Feared NHS cuts
prompt more demos. A candle-lit vigil has been staged overnight at
Westminster in protest over feared cuts at a Surrey hospital. Meanwhile in
Kent,
campaigners who fear for the future of Tonbridge Cottage Hospital have
handed a 16,000-name petition and a coffin to NHS chiefs. Both protests were
in response to two NHS reviews in the South East, although formal plans have
yet to be revealed. Protesters at Parliament were campaigning to keep
services at the Royal
Surrey Hospital, Guildford. Guildford's MP Anne Milton, and Jeremy Hunt,
MP for Surrey South West, joined campaigners in London. In Tonbridge, Reena
Pope, from Friends of Tonbridge Hospital, said the cottage hospital was
needed. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC Online 13 December 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Practices
caught in 'referral wars'. More than 60 per cent of GPs are having
hospital referrals regularly bounced back to them, Pulse's survey shows. A
bewildering array of reasons are being cited for the returns, which have
left GPs exasperated and worried for patients' wellbeing. One GP in three
said they had had a referral bounced back because it had not been submitted
in accordance with procedure. Almost 30 per cent cited cases where their
referral had been deemed unnecessary and they had been asked to manage the
patient themselves. Dr Lesley Taor, a GP in Orpington,
Kent,
was one of the 26 per cent to get a referral to a named consultant returned.
'It is ludicrous,' she said. 'We can't refer to named consultants, but when
referrals reach the wrong person they get bounced back to us, even when the
relevant consultant I wanted is in the same building. 'We have had patients
with hand problems getting sent to the back chap. One letter I sent to the
respiratory department ended up with rheumatology. I get incensed because it
is just rationing by another name.' One GP in five had been told to re-refer
because the procedure was cheaper elsewhere. Dr Claudia Webster-Smith, a GP
in Purley,
Surrey, said her practice was getting into 'referral wars' with
hospitals. She said: 'Sometimes we have to refer the patient straight back
because we just don't have the capacity in our practice. 'But what if
something happens to the patient during this referral war
? It's not fair on the patient.' Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 14 December 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Government push
means many trusts will use private firms next year. Almost 60 per cent
of PCTs in England could have brought in private firms to offer GP services
by the end of next year, a Pulse survey reveals. A total of 29 per cent of
trusts have either already tendered for Alternative Provider Medical
Services (APMS) contracts or are in the process of doing so. A further 11
per cent have plans to tender next year and 21 per cent are considering it.
Of those trusts to have already signed APMS contracts, more than
three-quarters have brought in private providers rather than use existing
GPs. The figures, from a survey of 51 post-reconfiguration PCTs, show the
Government's push for more trusts to adopt APMS is having an effect. A
similar survey by Pulse earlier this year (News, 8 June) found 10 per cent
of PCTs had signed APMS contracts, 10 per cent were tendering and a further
12 per cent planned to do so by the end of 2006. Dr Richard Vautrey, GPC
negotiator, said there was no need in the majority of cases for PCTs to use
the APMS contract rather than GMS or PMS. He also criticised trusts for
putting practices out to tender when incumbent GPs wanted to take them on.
'Individual GPs will put a lot of effort into turning a practice around,' he
said. 'It's unfortunate when GPs find themselves in a situation where they
have demonstrably provided good care but the PCT is not prepared to reward
them.'
Kent LMC is trying to persuade local PCTs to consider GMS providers as
well as APMS for practices they are putting out to tender. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 21 December 2006 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Equion awarded
£300m Kent Hospital PFI. An Equion consortium comprising of John Laing,
Laing O'Rourke and Interserve has been awarded preferred bidder status on
the £300m
Pembury Hospital PFI project. Equion beat off competition from Carillion
and Bouygues to capture the deal. The 512-bed hospital and 42-bed mental
health unit will be housed in a seven storey building. Final approval of the
plans is expected in early spring 2007 with construction commencing in
autumn next year. When operational the hospital will replace the existing
hospitals at Pembury and the Kent and Sussex Hospital. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of thePFI.net 22
December 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Healthcare that's
fit for the 21st century? A 107-bed, three-storey building on the
outskirts of
Lymington is to be officially opened on Tuesday 9 January and will soon
be the first complete NHS hospital to be run by the
private sector.
Lymington New Forest Hospital has been dubbed a "one-stop-shop",
incorporating appointment, consultant, diagnosis and treatment services -
all under one roof. Built by Ryhurst under the private finance initiative,
health bosses took official ownership of the building last week. That came
as the Department of Health announced it wanted Partnership Health Group (PHG),
a private company, to run all services at the hospital from July in a first
scheme of its kind in the country. Hampshire Primary Care Trust will run it
until then. PHG will invest £21m. The project is set to include a new 20,000
patient a year treatment centre at Royal South Hants Hospital in Southampton
from 2008. The six-ward Lymington hospital will employ about 400 staff and
see about 45,000 patients a year through its 8am to 10pm minor injures unit,
outpatient clinics and diagnostic treatment centre, which will carry fast,
prebooked day and short-stay surgery such as cataract removal, hip and knee
replacements and hernia repair. The hospital has two theatres, two endoscopy
suites, a larger radiology department with a CT scanner from next month, two
ultrasound suites, medical and surgical day units, stroke rehabilitation and
a surgical ward. There will be also be an urgent care centre plus support
services such as a pharmacy, education and training centre. Half of the beds
will be immediately filled by patients who are being transferred from the
existing Lymington hospital, in Southampton Road, which will be closed. The
site is being sold off to a developer to build 41 houses. PHG - jointly
owned by Care UK Plc and Life Healthcare - currently operates
NHS treatment
centres in
Plymouth,
Barlborough, near Chesterfield, and
Maidstone.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Salisbury
Journal 8 January 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Campaigners condemn plea for nurses to work unpaid. Health
campaigners today condemned an NHS trust for asking its staff to resign,
work for no pay or take unpaid leave in order to reduce its
multimillion-pound deficit.
Maidstone
and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, which reported a £16.7m deficit last
year, has sent staff a letter asking them to work unpaid for a day, take six
months unpaid leave, take voluntary redundancy or defer taking five days of
their holiday until next year to help balance its books. Staff and agencies
Friday January 26, 2007 Guardian Unlimited |
| |
2 |
|
|
5 |
£7.4m for
surgery, but K&C is at risk. A
new £7.4 million clinic could threaten the future of
Kent and
Canterbury Hospital. Plans are afoot to create the new facility which
will provide a GP surgery, outpatient clinic and day surgery, and on-site
diagnostics including X-ray, ultrasound, MRI and CAT scan facilities. If it
goes ahead it would be built as a partnership between Whitstable Medical
Practice and a private company which would contribute more than £5 million.
The chairman of Concern for Health in East Kent David Shortt believes the
new surgery could spell the end for Kent and Canterbury Hospital. He said:
"The system is now based on payment by results which effectively means
payment by activity. If procedures are taken away from the hospital, it will
receive less money and eventually a point will be reached where the hospital
will no longer be financially viable. We must also take into account that
with the 'choose and book' system, whereby patients can pick where they want
to be treated, patients might receive a gentle shove in the direction of the
new surgical facility in Whitstable." Bunny La Roche of the Keep Our NHS
Public campaign is disgusted by the possibility. She said: "If the scheme is
allowed to get off the ground it will destabilise local NHS provision.
Because of 'payment by results' the money follows the patient. Facilities
like this will undermine current services. We don't want an NHS dominated by
for-profit organisations. We want a universal and comprehensive system free
at the point of use."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of icKent
26 January 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
'Appalling'
delays for cancer patients. Seriously ill breast cancer patients are
having to wait up to three months for vital radiotherapy because of a lack
of funding, a consultant has claimed. And three women have gone on to
develop the disease for a second time while awaiting treatment in the past
few months, something virtually unheard of, according to Peter Jones. Mr
Jones, a consultant breast surgeon at the
Kent
Oncology Centre at Maidstone Hospital, said he felt forced to speak out
after one of his patients had to have a mastectomy while waiting for
radiotherapy, which, he believes, she would not have needed had she been
treated sooner. Bob Deans, director of commissioning for the West Kent PCT,
one of the three Kent PCTs which funds the service, pledged that an urgent
review would be ordered for funding of the service.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Kent
Messenger 29 January 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Hospitals told
not to operate until patients have waited 20 weeks. An NHS surgeon has
exposed how cash-strapped hospitals are being barred from operating on
cancer patients who have not waited long enough. In a withering assessment
of the financial management of the health service, Mr Jaffe said that
doctors were being restricted in getting waiting lists down by financial
limitations and ever-changing targets. The consultant plastic and
reconstructive surgeon said he and his colleagues are being prohibited from
operating in non-urgent cases unless the patient has been waiting for a
minimum of 20 weeks. This is because the hospital would not get paid - even
if the patient and staff were ready for the operation. Mr Jaffe said the
Prime Minister's pledge to have patients waiting no longer than 18 weeks
between referral and treatment would be "impossible" unless more money was
made available to primary care trusts. Mr Jaffe, who works at the University
Hospital of North
Staffordshire NHS Trust, said the 20-week ruling was a "global issue"
within the NHS and not just a problem at UHNS. He claimed that he was unable
to fill his evening lists because of the 20-week constraint, and that
patients were having to wait longer to be seen than necessary. He said:
"It's not the hospitals - these rules are being put in place by the PCTs to
take them over the April 1 threshold, when the new financial year begins and
they get their money from the Government. The way things stand, waiting
lists will grow, not shorten, if operations have to be put back because of a
lack of money. It's clearly a ridiculous way of doing business." His candid
remarks come on the same day that radiotherapists reveal how other cancer
patients are having to wait months beyond their recommended dates for
treatment that can prevent the disease returning. Channel 4's Dispatches
programme found that the waiting gap between operations to remove cancerous
growths and radiotherapy treatment is at least three months in
Kent,
breaching the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines. Three patients have
seen the disease return during the long gap between their operation and
radiotherapy. The programme found that five UK radiotherapy units have an
average wait of 28 days, which means that many patients are waiting longer.
In two centres, more than three-quarters of patients were not treated within
28 days. Mr Jaffe said Government proposals to increase operating hours into
the night were "laudable". But he added: "We would need more doctors, more
nurses, more staff. More, in fact, of all the people they keep making
redundant. They are getting rid of people yet trying to impose regulations
on us that mean we need more people. Nurses are qualifying yet no trusts are
employing them because they have no money." Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Telegraph
26 February 2007 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Hewitt approves seven PFI hospitals at cost of £1.5bn. Patricia
Hewitt, the health secretary, gave the green light yesterday to plans for
seven new hospitals to be built under the private finance initiative at a
cost of £1.5bn. Her decision to back the NHS's biggest ever tranche of
investment will provide modern facilities for patients in
Bristol,
Peterborough,
Middlesbrough,
Wakefield,
Tunbridge
Wells,
Chelmsford and
Edmonton, north London. But it added to anxieties among health service
managers and union leaders that the NHS is locking itself into repaying huge
sums in 30-year deals with the private sector for buildings and equipment
that may not meet changing medical needs. John Carvel, social affairs editor
Tuesday February 27, 2007 The Guardian
|
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Seven more PFI
hospitals to go ahead. Seven more private finance initiative hospitals, with
a capital value of almost £1.5bn, were finally given the go-ahead but amid
growing frustration among PFI providers at the time it is taking for the
Department of Health to adjust hospital building plans to the new, more
competitive, NHS market. The hospital PFI programme is being cut back from an
original £12bn of additional schemes to something closer to £7bn-£9bn, according
to the health department, as hospitals adjust to the uncertainty of a system
that pays them for each patient they treat, in contrast to block contracts. The
announcements in part reflect that. The value of the seven schemes given the
go-ahead is being reduced by about 15 per cent, or by £248m on their original
£1.63bn value. But although the go-aheads - for schemes at various stages of
procurement - has now been given the first stage of the review was meant to be
completed by late last year. And a reappraisal of 23 other schemes with a
capital value of about £5.5bn, including some individual projects worth £500m
and more, is unlikely to be completed before the autumn, the health department
said - the better part of two years since the review of PFI projects was
launched. To date, only a few PFI projects - the £1bn
Paddington campus
scheme, Whipps Cross and
Essex Rivers - have been withdrawn. Three of yesterday's approvals -
Peterborough, a rebuild in North
Bristol, and a smaller project in the
north-east, went through unchanged. Two more have undergone relatively minor
revision. But the
Maidstone
deal has been cut back from a £269m scheme to £218m, while one in Mid-Essex is
down from £199m to £143m. Unison, the health service union, protested that
taxpayers will be "paying over the odds" for the new facilities for years to
come because they have been built through the PFI. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Financial
Times 27 February 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Protestors take
to the streets over NHS cuts and closures. Thousands turned out last
weekend to protest at cuts, deficits, and increasing private sector
involvement in the NHS. The "Day of Action" was organised by NHS Together, a
collaboration of health service unions, NHS staff organisations, and the
Trades Union Congress. A series of events took place across the country. A
"Rock for the NHS" concert took the stage at
Woking, while in Crawley protestors marched in nightgowns and bandages.
Other rallies were held in Brighton,
Maidstone,
Gloucester,
Preston, Belfast,
London, and
Sunderland, where Dr George Rae, chairman of the BMA's northern regional
council (left) took part. In Tunbridge Wells, a small crowd protested at the
closure of the Homoeopathic Hospital. In
Birmingham, Unison general secretary Dave Prentis said the protests were
"testament to the growing number of people worried about the future of our
NHS." Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of British
Medical Journal 9 March 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
PCTs consider
alternative to homeopathic hospitals. One of England's four homeopathic
hospitals is at risk of closure because of primary care trusts' reluctance
to refer patients outside the NHS mainstream. Other homeopathic hospitals
are also facing severe financial problems.
Kent
PCT, which runs Tunbridge Wells Homeopathic Hospital and also refers the
majority of patients, is consulting on whether to vet all referrals made by
GPs to the hospital. As part of cost-cutting measures the PCT announced at
the end of last year, all referrals to the homeopathic hospital would be
scrutinised by an individual treatments panel, which would decide whether or
not the referral would go ahead. Campaigners claim this would have meant
many referrals being refused, and the subsequent slashing of resources could
have resulted in its closure. Following protests, Kent PCT has agreed to
review its commissioning process for treatment at the hospital, and a
decision is expected later in the spring. The Royal
London
Homeopathic Hospital is also experiencing a severe cut in funding, following
the cancellation of contracts by commissioning PCTs. Brent PCT has
terminated its contract with the Royal London, and Hammersmith and Fulham
PCT has 'signalled an intention to stop direct GP referrals'. It is
reviewing its position, but the PCT expects GPs will have to ask for
approval for any referral for homeopathic treatment. Other London PCTs are
also considering their position and look likely to reduce referrals. Royal
London Homeopathic Hospital clinical director Peter Fisher said: 'A
combination of bad press and financial turbulence in the NHS means we are
seen as a soft target. There is a collision here between PCTs' financial
imperative and the willingness to adhere to patient choice.' Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Health
Service Journal 15 March 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Health bosses
approve controversial A&E plans. The Accident and Emergency department
at
Maidstone Hospital looks set to close to most 999 ambulance calls. The
news that the unit will no longer see patients who need surgery being
brought in by emergency "blue light" ambulance will come as a bitter blow to
campaigners who fought to keep the service going. Board members of West Kent
Primary Care Trust approved the plans by the Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells
NHS Trust which will mean all trauma patients needing general surgery and
surgery on broken bones will go to other A&
E units. They instead gave the go ahead to a centralised emergency
and orthopaedic centre at the Kent and Sussex Hospital, and for planned
inpatient and day case surgery to be centralised at Maidstone. But they
recommended the changes could not go ahead until the outcome of the
county-wide Fit for the Future health service review is published, which is
not expected until June. The PCT's professional executive committee (PEC)
had found the public concerns that Maidstone Hospital was being "downgraded"
and that the proposals were finance-driven unsubstantiated.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Kent
Messenger
16 March 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Hospitals and schools on alert over listeria in
sandwiches. Thousands of sandwiches were recalled from schools,
hospitals and universities yesterday amid fears they could be contaminated
with listeria, a potentially fatal food bug. The Food Standards Agency
removed the sandwiches after listeria contamination was found in samples
during routine tests carried out on behalf of Ashford local authority in
Kent.
The FSA said the sandwiches from Kent-based Anchor Catering, which were
delivered to institutions across the south-east are labelled either Anchor
or Pomegranate and had use-by dates from February 21 to March 14. Thair
Shaikh
Saturday March 17, 2007 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS crisis is
forcing cuts to maternity care, charity warns. Support for pregnant
women is being cut because of the NHS's financial troubles, a healthcare
charity has warned. The National Childbirth Trust (NCT) says it is receiving
"increasing reports" that NHS antenatal classes, breastfeeding services and
postnatal visits are being cancelled. NHS antenatal classes have been cut or
suspended in at least 10 areas in England and Wales, according to the NCT.
These are Romsey in
Hampshire;
Worcestershire; Newham in
London;
Watford; Gwent in south Wales; south-west
Kent;
Nottinghamshire;
Gloucestershire; Hemel Hempstead in Hertfordshire; and Wiltshire. The
NCT said it also understood that postnatal home visits have been stopped or
are facing cuts in Wiltshire and in east and north Hertfordshire, which
would mean new mothers have to travel to a clinic in order to receive
after-birth care. Press Association
Monday March 26, 2007 SocietyGuardian.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Radiotherapy
machines 'lie idle'. A report by the Royal College of Radiologists has
found that 10% of Radiology machines were not being used. The total cost of
the machines is 150m. The college said the findings were "no surprise" and
the government acknowledged there was a problem.
Maidstone
Hospital was found to have two brand new machines that didn't work for a
year and manufacturer Varian said that this was happening across the
country. The report also found that more than 60% of the machines were not
using software, IMRT, designed to focus the machines on tumours to avoid
damaging healthy tissue. The Royal College of Radiographers' vice president
Michael Williams said services have improved, but that they still are not up
to scratch. "The present radiotherapy service is inadequate. People are
reluctant to admit how bad the situation is because they say it's a lot
better than it was," he said. The Department of Health has said that it is
currently studying recommendations from the national radiotherapy advisory
group on the future of radiography.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of BBC
7 April 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS admits 17
trusts are mired in debt. The Department of Health last night named 17
NHS hospital trusts across England which are mired in debts worth hundreds
of millions of pounds and cannot survive without a fundamental
reorganisation. David Nicholson, the NHS chief executive, said 12 were not
creditworthy enough to be lent money from government funds to cover an
accumulated deficit at the end of the financial year last month. Five were
permitted to take out loans, but acknowledged they could be repaid only over
"a very extended timescale". His announcement was the first official
confirmation of a Guardian inquiry in December which found at least a dozen
trusts were technically bankrupt, with no prospect of repaying debts. The
department removed Good Hope hospital in
Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands, from its financial sick list after
making arrangements in March for it to be taken over by Heart of England NHS
foundation trust, with hospitals in east Birmingham and Solihull. The
government hopes similar takeovers can be organised to rescue others on the
list of 17, but they may not be suitable in every area and some facilities
may have to close. The 13 trusts that could not afford to repay debts were:
Hinchingbrooke Health Care in Huntingdon;
Mid
Yorkshire; Queen Mary's, Sidcup,
Kent;
Royal
Cornwall; Royal Wolverhampton;
Coventry & Warwickshire; West Middlesex; Weston Area Health,
Weston-super-Mare; and three
London trusts -
Barking, Havering and Redbridge; Bromley; and Queen Elizabeth, Woolwich. The
five that could not repay loans in the foreseeable future were: North
Bristol; Royal United hospital, Bath; Surrey and Sussex Healthcare; the
Royal West Sussex; and Whipps Cross, London. John Carvel, social affairs
editor
Thursday April 26, 2007 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
A&E decision
passed to government. Councillors made history when they referred a
decision on the future of health services to the Health Secretary. Members
of Kent
County Council's NHS overview and scrutiny committee threw out the plans for
changes to emergency general surgery and orthopaedic surgery at Maidstone
and Tunbridge Wells during a lengthy debate. During the heated discussion,
they voted instead to refer the matter to Secretary of State for Health,
Patricia Hewitt, by a majority of eight to five. It was the first time the
committee has exercised the right to refer a decision to her since it was
given the power in 2003. The committee had questioned Maidstone and
Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust chief executive Rose Gibb, whose trust put forward
the plans, and Steve Phoenix, chief executive of the West Kent Primary Care
Trust, which had voted to approve the plans in March. Councillors had
reservations about the impact of plans on local people to create a
specialist emergency orthopaedic centre at Tunbridge Wells, which would mean
some emergency patients would no longer be seen at Maidstone A&
E.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Kent
Online 14 May 2007 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Hard-up NHS
trusts cut back on unproven homoeopathy treatment. The NHS is turning
its back on homoeopathy and other unproven alternative medicines in the face
of a financial crisis and pressure from doctors. More than half of the
primary care trusts (PCTs) in England are now refusing to pay for
homoeopathy or severely restricting access. Figures obtained by Les Rose,
one of the doctors, and The Times under the Freedom of Information Act show
that at least 86 of the 147 trusts have either stopped sending patients to
the four homoeopathic hospitals, or are introducing strict measures to limit
referrals. Another 40 trusts have yet to provide data. More than 20 have
taken action since receiving a letter organised a year ago today by
Professor Michael Baum, a cancer specialist at University College London,
which argued that "unproven or disproved treatments" such as homoeopathy and
reflexology ought not to be available free to patients. The move away from
homoeopathy has been so significant that two homoeopathic hospitals are
threatened with closure. West
Kent
PCT is consulting over plans to shut Tunbridge Wells Homoeopathic Hospital
and the Royal London
Homoeopathic Hospital (RLHH) has asked supporters to lobby trusts and MPs.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Times
23 May 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
PFI prisons
approved but health deal set to be axed. Two more prisons are to be
built under the private finance initiative, but another big contract for the
private sector to supply tests and diagnostics to National Health Service
patients looks set to be scrapped. a £70m contract to provide tens of
thousands of X-rays, scans and endoscopies to NHS patients across
Kent,
Sussex and Surrey - activity seen as crucial if the NHS is to meet its
target of a maximum 18-week wait for treatment - looks set to be pulled,
even though it has already reached commercial close. It will be the second
sizeable contract to be dropped in two months, with the Department of Health
having to pay millions of pounds in compensation on bid costs for the deals.
The department would confirm only that the contract - like all the other
unsigned central private sector NHS contracts - was under review with an
announcement due later this month. The South East Coast strategic health
authority, however, is understood to have lost patience with the
department's delay on the deal, and said it needed to find other ways of
providing the service to meet the 18-week deadline. That could include
contracting with the private sector locally as well as using existing NHS
provision more intensively. One private provider said the NHS contracts
appeared to be "falling like dominoes" and the government risked seeing the
overseas providers of NHS services that it had worked so hard to bring in
after 2002 walking away from NHS provision. Already the US-owned Nation's
Health has pulled out, selling its interest in three independent surgical
centres set up to treat NHS patients.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Financial
Times 3 August 2007 |
| |
|
|
|
|
NHS patients who complain risk victimisation, say inspectors. NHS
patients who complain about a poor standard of care are at risk of being
victimised, health inspectors warn today after the first national audit of the
complaints system in England. The Healthcare Commission said it launched the
review after becoming increasingly concerned about how hospitals and primary
care trusts respond when patients criticise the behaviour of staff or conditions
in hospitals or GP surgeries. After a risk assessment of all trusts, it
identified 32 hospitals, ambulance services and primary care trusts which
appeared to have the least satisfactory arrangements. Inspectors found none had
comprehensive safeguards to ensure that people who complained could be confident
their care would not suffer as a result. They identified "significant lapses" at
nine of the audited trusts. "The main concern was an absence of systems to
monitor whether care had changed in any way as a result of a complaint," the
commission said. Few trusts were using complaints to learn how to improve the
service. The commission named 12 trusts where it found "significant lapses" in
one or more of the national standards for managing NHS complaints. It said this
would affect their marks in the annual performance tables. Another six were
given formal warnings and 12 were told to make improvements. Only two got a
clean bill of health. The commission investigates about 8,000 appeals a year
from patients who have complained to a hospital or primary care trust and are
dissatisfied with the response. Its report concluded: "Processes can be
fragmented and applied inconsistently within individual trusts and across the
NHS ... the emphasis remains on the process rather than seeking to find
resolution for the person raising a complaint." It criticised trusts for doing
little to help people from ethnic minority communities or patients with learning
difficulties. Anna Walker, the commission's chief executive, said: "Given that
the NHS provides 380m treatments a year, the number of complaints - 140,000 - is
relatively small. But when someone does complain, trusts need to respond well.
Patients want complaints resolved quickly and locally." The report praised one
of the largest and busiest acute hospitals in the north-west for learning from a
complaint about a patient who died after an MRSA infection. Relatives expressed
concern about staff wearing uniforms outside the hospital, risking
contamination. The trust devised a new dress code and invested in facilities for
staff to change clothes. Peter Walsh, chief executive of Action against Medical
Accidents, said: "This audit is further evidence, as if we needed it, that the
way many NHS organisations handle complaints adds insult to injury and there is
an urgent need for improvement."
John Carvel, social affairs editor
Monday
October 8, 2007 The Guardian. [The list is incomplete as it omits NHS
bodies in the
York area, despite the prolonged neglect of
Sharon Wilson.]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
NHS superbug inquiry blames trust for deaths. Scores of NHS patients
were killed during Britain's deadliest outbreak of a hospital superbug, a
damning report by the government's health watchdog reveals today. The
Healthcare Commission attributed the deaths of 90 patients at the
Maidstone
and Tunbridge Wells hospitals in Kent to infection from Clostridium
difficile, which causes severe diarrhoea and has taken over from MRSA as the
main threat to patients. Evidence will be referred to Kent police and the
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) about how the trust's slack infection
controls contributed to the deaths. They will decide whether to bring
criminal charges, which could include murder, manslaughter or breaches of
health and safety legislation, said Anna Walker, chief executive of the
Healthcare Commission. John Carvel, social affairs editor
Thursday October 11, 2007 The Guardian
- Trust failed to warn of outbreak or improve hygiene. Commission
says board had no antibiotics policy and misled public on cause. John Carvel
Social affairs editor
Thursday October 11, 2007 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Superbug hospital chief given £250,000 to quit. The NHS manager
responsible for Britain's deadliest outbreak of a hospital superbug was
given a payoff worth more than £250,000 to quit her job last week before the
Healthcare Commission produced a damning report on her trust's
mismanagement, the Guardian has learned. Rose Gibb, who earned £150,000 a
year as chief executive of
Maidstone
and Tunbridge Wells hospitals, stepped down last Friday. Five days later
the commission accused the trust of "significant failings in infection
control" that caused the deaths of 90 patients between April 2004 and
September 2006. The patients were the victims of two outbreaks of
Clostridium difficile, which can be fatal, particularly for older people
weakened by other medical conditions. Kent police and the Health and Safety
Executive were reviewing the report on the deaths yesterday before deciding
whether to press criminal charges against the trust. Alan Johnson, the
health secretary, intervened last night after concern at the Department of
Health about whether the payoff was appropriate. He said: "I have instructed
the trust to withhold any severance payment to the former chief executive of
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS trust, pending legal advice." John Carvel,
social affairs editor
Friday October 12, 2007 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
The dirty truth on the wards. The debate over the poor treatment of
elderly patients in Britain's hospitals will be reignited this weekend after
an Observer investigation revealed that vulnerable people are being forced
to use embarrassing portable toilets or wear incontinence pads rather than
being taken to the bathroom. The investigation found that nurses and
healthcare assistants no longer routinely accompany elderly patients to the
toilet, particularly when wards are busy. The revelation comes days after
Maidstone
and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, where 90 people died of the C. difficile
infection, was criticised for allowing patients to go to the toilet in their
beds.
Sunday October 14, 2007 The Observer
|
| |
|
|
|
|
A private matter.
Attending the Paul
Sieghart Memorial Lecture given in 2004 by
Baroness Hale of Richmond made me realise that the key to improving care
for older, frail people was through a better understanding and application
of the Human
Rights Act. The title of her talk was: "What can the Human Rights Act do
for my mental health?" She described how providers of public services abused
the human rights of frail older people every day by failing to recognise the
need for privacy and dignity when providing personal care - for instance,
with access to the toilet.
Watching older people losing their basic rights as soon as they entered
hospital had made me increasingly frustrated. Four-hour trolley waits and
the waiting list initiative led to major improvements for older people, but
this has been achieved at the expense of their dignity, privacy and
humanity. I have seen too many older people struggling to be heard and to
have their basic needs met, particularly in mixed wards and in wards that
are not run or designed with them in mind. Some managers have stated that
privacy has to be sacrificed for safety. After the recent
problems at
Maidstone
and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, this can no longer be acceptable.
We all take going to the toilet in private for granted, so why should our
expectations change when we are admitted to hospital or to a care home? This
premise led to the development of
Behind Closed Doors,
a multi-agency campaign spearheaded by the British Geriatrics Society. We
chose toilet access as a marker of human rights and dignity.
We need to implement a major
change of culture at every level. This can be done through use of our
official standards, which highlight bad practice (such as ignoring requests
for assistance to the toilet and telling people to use their pads) and good
practice (such as ensuring privacy and modesty). We recommend that all
people in hospitals or care homes, whatever their age and physical
disability, should be able to use the toilet in private and that there
should be enough clean toilets and equipment to achieve this. Designers,
planners and architects need to understand that two-thirds of people
admitted to hospital are over 65 and that the numbers of people over 80, who
are more likely to be frail and require assistance, are expected to rise by
two-thirds by 2026.
Our campaign will ensure that present and future generations of frail and
vulnerable older people are aware of their rights. We need to continue to
make the public and professionals aware that sensitive and humane care is
part of effective care and can never be sacrificed in the name of efficiency
and safety. Jackie Morris
October 14, 2007 commentisfree.guardian.co.uk |
| |
|
|
|
|
Superbug hospital chairman resigns. The chairman of the NHS hospital
trust where 90 patients died from Clostridium difficile infection accused
the government last night of singling it out for vilification when ministers
knew scores of other trusts had worse infection rates. James Lee resigned as
chairman of Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS trust, after Alan Johnson, the
health secretary, launched fresh inquiries into his role in organising a
£250,000 pay-off for the chief executive, Rose Gibb. Mr Lee, a film
executive and former director of the Financial Times, was already under
investigation by the South-east Coast strategic health authority for the
part he played during two outbreaks of C difficile between April 2004 and
September 2006. The Healthcare Commission said last week that 1,176 patients
were infected with C difficile during two outbreaks when 345 patients died.
It said 90 of the deaths were definitely or probably caused by the infection
and blamed slack management for failing to contain it. Last night Mr Lee
released the text of a four-page letter to Mr Johnson admitting there was no
excuse for what happened at the trust's three hospitals. He said: "I am
deeply saddened by these terrible events and take full responsibility for my
part as chairman of the board for the past five years. I apologise
unreservedly." But he hit back at the unreasonable pressures imposed on the
trust by the government. "We have been struggling with a state pretty close
to bankruptcy," he said. The trust's clinical income last year increased by
1.5% in cash terms when staff pay rates were rising by over 5%. "We knew the
Treasury was pumping money into the NHS, but quite frankly none of this
seemed to be getting to the coalface." As income fell, hospital activity
rose by 11%. The trust cut costs by more than £40m in an attempt to break
even. It struggled to cut maximum waiting times to 18 weeks. But this was
"never really achievable". Mr Lee said attempts to get rid of a small
minority of poor nurses were ineffective because "NHS employment practices
make it difficult to take action, even against transparent incompetence". He
sent the letter, labelled strictly private and confidential, before he knew
whether Mr Johnson would back him or accept his resignation. He denied any
impropriety in the severance payment to Ms Gibb. The government was
persisting in treating Maidstone as a "rogue trust", when it knew there were
83 acute trusts in Britain with higher C difficile rates in the first three
months of this year. "We are now so discredited that we are no longer
believed," he said, appealing to Mr Johnson to explain the facts to the
public. He added: "The NHS is run on the basis of command and control. I
personally have never experienced such centralised or detailed control ...
This way of managing things is fundamentally incompatible with the whole
concept of independent trusts ... I have done my best." Mr Lee broke his
silence after Mr Johnson told MPs he had ordered a departmental review of
the chairman's role in agreeing severance terms for Ms Gibb. John Carvel,
social affairs editor
Tuesday October 16, 2007 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Fly on the wall interviews: Local authority and primary care trust
partnerships. IDeA's National Adviser for Healthy Communities,
Liam Hughes, introduces a compelling series of case studies that explore the
relationships between councils and primary care trusts (PCTs);-
Barnsley Council and PCT 17 October 2007;
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council 17 October 2007;
London Borough of Brent 17 October 2007;
Cannock Chase Council and PCT 17 October 2007;
Croydon Council and Croydon's PCT 16 October 2007;
Gateshead Council and Gateshead PCT 16 October 2007;
Greenwich Council 17 October 2007;
Herefordshire Council 17 October 2007;
Kent Council and PCT 15 October 2007;
Knowsley: joint appointment council and PCT; 15 October 2007
Lewisham Council and PCT 15 October 2007;
Shropshire County Council 15 October 2007;
Stockton-on-Tees Council and PCT 17 October 2007;
| |