|
The summary articles in the table below related to the strategic health
authority area are copied from the following pages, indicated in the table by
key numbers.
-
Charges
-
Construction projects
-
Resource shortfall Sources
-
Treatment approval or not
- Withdrawal of Local Facilities -
Sources
Other
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Summary articles |
| |
|
|
|
|
'Lessons to be learned from Shipman crimes'. Society
Friday July 19, 2002 [Greater Manchester] |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Patients are being told that they will be put on waiting lists for
chemotherapy, because of a funding crisis at one of Europe's leading cancer
treatment hospitals. Helen Carter
Thursday May 15, 2003 The Guardian [Christie Hospital, Manchester] |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Cancer patients at Manchester's Christie hospital have been
saved from the prospect of waiting lists for chemotherapy, after a
last-minute meeting produced a cash lifeline. Faisal al Yafai
Friday
May 23, 2003 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
Where the treatment centres will be. The health secretary, John Reid, today
announced details of the government's controversial programme of privately run
fast-track diagnostic and treatment centres, and a number of new mobile
ophthalmology units. This guide explains where they will be.
Friday September 12, 2003 [South-west peninsula (Mercury Health Ltd),
Lincolnshire (Mercury Health Ltd), Horton hospital, north Oxford (Mercury Health
Ltd), North-east Yorks (Mercury Health Ltd), Southampton (Mercury Health Ltd),
Northumberland (Mercury Health Ltd), East Berkshire (Slough, Bracknell,
Maidenhead and Windsor/Ascot) (Mercury Health Ltd), Didcot, Oxfordshire (Mercury
Health Ltd), Ashford, Surrey (Mercury Health Ltd), Maidstone (Care UK Afrox),
Barlborough Links, Nottinghamshire (Care UK Afrox), Derriford, Plymouth (Care UK
Afrox), Chase Farm, Barnet, London (Anglo Canadian), King George hospital,
Redbridge (Anglo Canadian), Royal National throat nose and ear hospital, Kings
Cross, London (Anglo Canadian), Bradford (Nations Healthcare), Burton (Nations
Healthcare), Daventry (Birkdale Clinic), Trafford, Greater Manchester
(Netcare UK), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore (New York
Presbyterian), Shepton Mallet, Somerset (New York Presbyterian).
Two mobile units will offer ophthalmology services in the following areas:
Cheshire and Merseyside (Netcare UK), Cumbria and Lancashire (Netcare UK),
Horton, Oxfordshire (Netcare UK), Wycombe, Bucks (Netcare UK), North Tyneside
(Netcare UK), South-west Oxfordshire (Netcare UK), North-west peninsula (Netcare
UK), Dorset/Somerset (Netcare UK), Kent/Medway (Netcare UK), Hants and Isle of
Wight (Netcare UK), Surrey and Sussex (Netcare UK), Thames Valley (Netcare UK)] |
| |
|
|
|
|
Commuters will be able to get free medical attention on their way to and
from work at a chain of NHS walk-in centres to be built near city-centre
stations, the government announced yesterday. John Hutton, the health minister,
said the first seven centres would open in the spring in
London,
Newcastle,
Manchester and
Leeds at a cost of £25m over the first three years. John Carvel,
social affairs editor
Thursday November 4, 2004
|
| |
|
|
4 |
|
A man who had to pay £8,000 for surgery to rid him of prostate cancer is
demanding a refund and apology from his health trust, saying he was the victim
of a "postcode lottery". Bob Norburn, 56, an engineer from Westhoughton, near
Bolton, was diagnosed with terminal prostate cancer, but the NHS refused to pay
for cryotherapy - a procedure offered at Sunderland hospital specifically for
this illness. Though not approved by the National Institute of Clinical
Excellence (Nice), the treatment has a 98% success rate. He opted to pay
privately. The operation was a success and, two months on, he has been given the
all-clear. Helen Carter
Saturday
December 11, 2004 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
More than 2,000 women who were screened for breast cancer are having their
records reviewed "as a matter of urgency" following concerns about accuracy.
The first of the women were recalled for further investigations yesterday
afternoon after having mammograms at two hospitals in Greater Manchester
between April 2003 and April 2005. The review involves 1,267 patients screened
at Trafford General hospital and 1,195 patients seen at North Manchester
General hospital. It does not involve any women who were routinely checked
under the NHS Breast Screening Programme. Paul Marinko
Saturday
May 28, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Health services in Greater Manchester will face a funding shortfall of
more than £700m unless urgent action is taken, it was claimed yesterday. Helen
Carter
Friday September 5, 2003 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
An IS-TC in Greater Manchester run by South African company Netcare has lost
the health economy nearly £2m in its first six months, according to a
confidential report by Greater Manchester surgical centre's contract management
board. 14 PCTs have paid £1.9m to Netcare for operations that were not carried
out, as patients opted for traditional NHS care. The IS-TC performed fewer than
4,000 of 6,000 contracted operations, yet under the contract Netcare have been
paid for the full amount. The biggest loser has been Ashton, Leigh and Wigan
PCT, which paid nearly £500,000 for an anticipated 688 procedures, of which only
67 were performed. Ashton finance director David Wharfe admitted the situation
"does not represent value for money." Health Service Journal 15 December
2005 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
A crisis-hit mental health trust has withdrawn up to £2m of cuts and
dropped plans to close a care ward for elderly people, after staff threatened
to strike, but unions have declared a formal dispute over high risk levels.
Tash Shifrin
Friday December 19, 2003 |
| |
2 |
|
|
|
Banks and property developers made windfall profits of £73m by refinancing
one of the Labour government's first privately financed hospitals, the 989-bed
Norfolk and Norwich hospital, the National Audit Office reveals in a report
published today. The windfall is the third to be disclosed by parliament's
financial watchdog after complaints from MPs and the public. The other two are
Fazakerley prison in Liverpool and the Dartford and Gravesham hospital. The
report says that funding for five other privately financed hospitals - South
Buckinghamshire, Calderdale, North Durham, Bromley and South Manchester - could
also yield windfall profits for developers. David Hencke, Westminster
correspondent
Friday June 10, 2005 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Possible
judicial review over baby units shake-up. Salford City Council is
considering launching a judicial review over fears that maternity services in
the city could be scrapped. Salford council is threatening legal action
because it believes the process used to choose favoured options in the
streamlining of services by Greater Manchester SHA could be flawed. If health
bosses go ahead with their preferred model it would mean the maternity unit at
Hope Hospital in Salford would close.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Manchester Evening News 12 January 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Seventeen women are at an increased risk of dying of breast cancer because
a consultant radiologist wrongly gave them the all-clear. Doctors
investigating the work of the unnamed radiologist's work said the delay in
getting a correct diagnosis could "significantly alter" the women's chances of
survival; one had been diagnosed two years after being told she was in the
clear. The findings are the result of a massive review of breast cancer cases
in greater Manchester ordered when concerns were raised about the
radiologist's work at Trafford General hospital and the North Manchester
General hospital. Doubts were first voiced in April last year, and he was
suspended when a small sample of his tests was found to be wrong. Sam Jones
Tuesday
January 24, 2006 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Petitions "not
worth the paper they are written on". Healthy Futures, the team carrying
out a review and consultation on the future of Greater Manchester's hospitals,
has angered residents by saying that petitions "carry absolutely no weight and
will not be considered as we can't analyse a signature". Campaigners against
the closure of the children's, maternity and emergency wards at Rochdale
Infirmary have so far collected 30,000 signatures.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Manchester Evening News 27 January 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
The two-star Royal Bolton hospital has commissioned an independent inquiry
after three women died in childbirth in its maternity unit between October
2005 and the middle of this month. The baby of one of the mothers also died.
Internal investigators have found no link, but because deaths in childbirth
are so rare it requested the second inquiry, which will report at the end of
February. Sarah Hall, health correspondent
Tuesday
January 31, 2006 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
5 |
New hope for
threatened hospital. A report commissioned by the Greater Manchester SHA
has recommended that threatened Altrincham General Hospital be kept open as it
has a long-term future, as do Trafford General and Stretford Memorial
hospitals. A budget deficit at Trafford Healthcare Trust had led to proposals
to relocate the services provided by Altrincham. Summary by Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 2
February 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Up to 1,000 patients may have been wrongly diagnosed with heart problems
due to mistakes made by a temporary technician at an NHS hospital, it was
revealed last night. Managers at Fairfield general hospital in Bury, Greater
Manchester, launched an inquiry into all echocardiogram examinations carried
out by an individual technician between May and December last year. John
Carvel and Polly Curtis
Friday
February 3, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
SHA warns
ministers to back off. Greater Manchester SHA has proposed radical
restructuring of services, and is warning politicians not to buckle under
democratic pressure to retain hospitals and A&
E departments. The acute services review in north-east Manchester could
see fewer A& E departments, with
some hospitals no longer carrying out emergency surgery. In Rochdale, a
20,000-signature petition has opposed the changes, which could see Rochdale
Infirmary become a 'locality' hospital. More radical options under
consultation would see the acute sites across the SHA reduced to two or even
one. A LIFT project would provide 35 new health centres. Changes to other
services would include a reduction in the number of centres carrying out
breast surgery. Under four of the five options, sites with inpatient
obstetrics and paediatrics would be reduced to seven or eight. Each would have
high dependency and special costs, and there would be three neonatal intensive
care unit sites. The favoured option for children's and maternity services is
already being opposed by Salford city council, whose leader has talked of
applying for a judicial review. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 16 February 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
'No admissions'
at NHS hospital. 24-hour care is no longer available at Altringham General
Hospital due to a cash crisis. Trafford NHS Trust in Greater Manchester is
closing two in-patient wards, used mainly for rehabilitation of the
elderly,.to save money. Only day clinics will remain.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 8 March 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Wards closing "as
cash goes private". Bernard Ribeiro, president of the Royal College of
Surgeons of England, has said hospital wards across Greater Manchester are
closing because a private clinic is attracting funds from the NHS. At the same
time as Trafford Acute Trust last week announced that two 26-bed wards will shut
at Altrincham General, millions of pounds of public money is being channelled
into the private Greater Manchester Surgical Centre in Trafford, a 48-bed unit
run by Netcare and staffed with South African surgeons. Ribeiro said that in the
first six months of this year, £2 million had been diverted away from Trafford
to fund treatments at the private clinic.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Manchester Evening News 13 March 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Hundreds of people have protested in the North West against the proposed
closure of hospital wards and units. Staff and parents gathered near Hope
Hospital, Salford, Greater Manchester, on Saturday to voice their anger at
plans to shut down its neo-natal unit. People trying to save Macclesfield
General Hospital's maternity ward were involved in a "pram push" in
Cheshire. Public consultations involving Greater Manchester Health Strategic
Health Authority finish on 12 May. It follows plans to review community and
hospital health services in Greater Manchester and Rossendale in Lancashire.
A public consultation is also taking place on the options for change for
healthcare services for children, young people, parents and babies across
Greater Manchester, east Cheshire and High Peak.
BBC
Online 25 March 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
The mood of crisis in the NHS deepened yesterday with the announcement
of 720 further job losses at a hospital trust in the Midlands and the
resignation of a trust chief executive in the north-west, with a £475,000
payoff.
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS trust said it would have to shed 720
jobs over the next 12 months to balance the books after accumulating
deficits worth £31.5m over several years. The staff affected will include
nurses, doctors and administrative workers at hospitals in Worcester,
Redditch and Kidderminster, where Labour lost a safe parliamentary seat in
2001 due to local protest at the downgrading of NHS facilities. The job
losses bring the total announced by trusts in England over the past five
weeks to more than 6,000. The toll this week included 160 jobs at
Medway
trust in Kent, 400 at
Surrey and Sussex Healthcare trust and up to 300 at Royal United
hospitals in
Bath. Meanwhile Pennine Acute, the largest NHS trust in the north-west
of England, with hospitals in
Bury,
north Manchester, Oldham and Rochdale, announced the early retirement of
its chief executive, Chris Appleby, who was under pressure to go after a
vote of no confidence from the trust's doctors last summer. An independent
inquiry into the trust by Sir George Alberti, former president of the Royal
College of Physicians, found a "lethal mixture" of suspect leadership styles
and poor relations between doctors and managers. Other NHS developments
included a report from the Audit Commission warning of serious concerns
about the financial position of
George Eliot hospital trust in
Nuneaton. It had "deteriorated to such an extent that it cannot be
managed simply through local measures", said the auditors,
PricewaterhouseCoopers. And in
Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, NHS managers said a new multimillion-pound
mental health ward may never be opened because there was not the money
to run it. John Carvel and Les Reid
Friday April 7, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
Health chief gets
£475,000 pay-off. Chris Appleby, the chief executive of
Pennine Acute Hospitals Trust who has agreed to retire early after
conflicts with doctors, is to receive a payout of almost half a million
pounds. He had been under pressure to go since the trust's medics held a
vote of no confidence into his management last summer. Senior medical staff
felt patient care was suffering in the drive to meet
targets.
Politicians who campaigned for Mr Appleby to go say they are "disgusted" by
his payout. David Heyes, MP for Ashton under Lyne, said: "The large sums
involved are a terrible contrast to the way other NHS employees are
treated."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Manchester Evening News 11 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Hospital plea
goes to Blair. A 30,000-signature petition from the people of
Rochdale against plans to shut or scale down emergency, children's and
maternity services at Rochdale Infirmary has been hand delivered to Downing
Street. It comes after Celia Gaze, director of the Healthy Futures review of
services in north east Manchester, was quoted as saying the petitions "carry
absolutely no weight and will not be considered as we can't analyse a
signature".
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Manchester Evening News 14 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Up to a third of
dentists won't sign NHS contract. Nearly a third of dentists in some
parts of England have refused to sign new NHS contracts - contradicting a
recent statement by Tony Blair that "about 90 to 95%" of dentists had signed
up. A leaked government document, showing exactly how many dentists in each
area have taken up the contracts, reveals that in the
south west, 29% of dentists have refused to sign up; in the
Thames
Valley, 15%; in
Hampshire, 18%; in
Yorkshire, 23%; and in the
West Midlands, 24%. In south-west
London, the
figure is 12%; in
Manchester, 11%; in
Kent,
14%; and in
Dorset, 15%. In
Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire, 23% have not signed up. Of the
9,419 contracts offered in England, 1,096 have been rejected, including some
covering more than one dentist - a national average of 12% more than Mr
Blair's claim.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Telegraph 16 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Heywood and Middleton primary care trust in
Greater Manchester has agreed to
pay about £2,500 for laser treatment to remove a transsexual woman's tattoos.
Riazat Butt Thursday April 20, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Hospital is a
financial risk to the NHS. South
Manchester PCT has raised concerns about the viability of Withington
Community Hospital less than a year after it opened. The PCT said the
under-use of the hospital's theatre for operations posed one of the most
significant financial risks to the PCT. But to increase the number of
operations done in the theatre, near-by Wythenshawe Hospital must send
patients there for treatment. Wythenshawe said it would like to use this
extra capacity to cut waits, but it can not do this without more money from
South Manchester PCT. A spokesman for South Manchester University Hospitals
Trust, which runs Wythenshawe Hospital, said they were in a catch 22
situation. The PCT said it is exploring ways to get more patients through
the door now they can choose where they want to go for treatment, include
making a marketing video to send to GPs explaining what services are
available at the hospital and how they can be accessed.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
South Manchester Reporter 24 April 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
England hero
slams maternity closure plan. A world-famous footballer has described
plans to shut
Rochdale Infirmary's maternity unit as 'disastrous'. Manchester United's
midfield star Paul Scholes, whose children were born at the Infirmary, is
backing the Hands Off Our Hospital campaign. He is urging local residents
and football fans to get behind the campaign, which last week went to 10
Downing Street with thousands of signed petitions against plans to scrap
maternity, neo-natal and children's services. Plans are also in place to cut
urgent accident and emergency care, turn the Infirmary into a locality
hospital and create an Urgent Care Centre. Scholes said: "My children were
born at Rochdale Infirmary and the staff were absolutely fantastic. I have
been keeping a close eye on what is happening at Rochdale and the thought of
the maternity unit closing down would be disastrous for everybody in the
area. I urge everyone to back this campaign and fight for what should be
every mother's right, to give birth at their local hospital."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Rochdale Observer 27 April 2006 |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
|
5 |
The politics
column - Allyson Pollock. In the New Statesman's main political column,
Allyson Pollock writes: "According to Patricia Hewitt the NHS has had its
best year ever. So why is the Royal College of Nursing threatening
industrial action over cuts and
closures, and why did the annual conference of Unison, traditional
Labour supporters, greet the secretary of state with heckling?
In her words, "the NHS must
modernise or die".
So why, from
Surrey to
Manchester and from
Gateshead to
Shropshire, are local people banding into hospital action groups and "Keep
our NHS public" campaigns in an effort to defend the health service
? The chief targets for cuts are
mental health services, palliative care,
older people's care and emergency hospital care, yet Hewitt maintains,
to general derision, that quality will not be affected…
Pay accounts for 60-70 per cent
of NHS hospital budgets, but pay awards accounted for less than 30 per cent
of the new money and should have been absorbed easily. Nor was greed
involved; the increases returned NHS pay to previous levels after years of
pay freezes. The hourly rate of the lowest-paid rose initially from £5.16 to
£5.67 an hour; medical consultants got increases of 4-5 per cent a year,
taking them to averages of between £75,000 and £95,000, while managers -
their numbers swollen by the complications of marketisation - got 7.5 per
cent more last year. The real reason for the decision to axe in excess of
13,000 clinical staff and 1,000 NHS beds, plus associated services, is
market-oriented
reforms such as "choose and book",
"payment by results" and
foundation hospitals.
Hospitals and services are required to behave like stand-alone companies,
competing with each other and private corporations for income and patients…
The government plans to hand over most of the NHS budget to the private
sector through "practice-based commissioning". Under this policy, local PCTs
will eventually contract with for-profit companies such as the US-owned
UnitedHealth Europe to provide GP services… The Prime Minister asserts that
the reforms are bearing fruit, and so they are - for "investors" such as the
lucky shareholders of
Norfolk and Norwich and
Bromley
PFI hospitals, who received a
windfall of more than £500m within months of the new hospitals opening. But
the PFI has been less "fruitful" for local people, who have seen a quarter
of beds closed and clinical staff and community provision cut. A large part
of hospital trust deficits is due to PFI debts, running at £1.5bn a year…
And then there are the costs associated with establishing and operating a
market - costs the NHS was explicitly designed to avoid: these are for
invoicing, marketing, advertising, drawing up hundreds of thousands of
contracts, legal disputes with contractors and rival hospitals, and using
management consultants… And though NHS hospitals remain responsible for
balancing their books, the government has ensured that the only way they can
do so is by cuts, closures, the sale of land and buildings - and more
privatisation. Some foundation trusts are entering joint ventures with
companies such as the Hospital Corporation of America, providing care to
private patients in what were previously NHS beds. Others are
charging NHS patients for "extra" care: Queen
Charlotte's and Chelsea NHS hospital has introduced a fee of £4,000 for
one-to-one midwife care - once the NHS standard - and the government is
allowing it. The less fortunate hospitals - if that is the right word - are
closing services and sacking staff. Is this what the English patient needs
or wants ?"
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
New Statesman 2 May 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Health bosses
reject unit closure. Bury PCT has rejected plans to close the maternity
unit at the town's Fairfield Hospital.
Greater Manchester SHA wants to locate in-patient, maternity and
neo-natal wards at eight larger sites across the region. But Bury PCT said
this would "significantly disadvantage" people living in Bury and Rochdale.
The PCT is now calling on a re-think of the strategy, which could also see
the closure of the neo-natal unit at Hope Hospital and maternity units at
Rochdale Infirmary and Trafford General. Dr Derek Fletcher, chair of the
Professional Executive Committee, said the PCT shared the concerns of the
people of Bury. A public consultation on the strategy ends on 12 May.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 4 May 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Why the NHS is on
the ballot paper. Overview and scrutiny committee's (OSCs) of local
authorities can demand NHS chief executives appear before them and set their
own agendas of what they want to examine, as well as being consulted on
major NHS changes. As such they can have a big impact on reconfigurations,
and parties could campaign in
local
elections on the claim that their party was the one
standing up most strongly for their local hospital. All this explains
why many councillors are making the NHS a bigger issue at elections than
ever before. For example in
Kirklees
three Save Huddersfield NHS candidates could hold the balance of power on
the council if elected. The trio have been leading the campaign against
plans to move services from their local hospital to Halifax. Tens of
thousands of people have signed petitions and attended demonstrations.
Service changes at the hospital have recently been accepted by the trust but
the group is seeking a judicial review, and Kirklees council OSC has also
expressed reservations, referring changes to maternity services to the
health secretary. In West
Sussex, Conservative county council leader Henry Smith says the loss of
services at Crawley Hospital has had a big impact on local politics, and
recent job losses announced by Surrey and Sussex Healthcare trust are
uppermost in residents' minds. The East Sussex committee, which covers an
area where the health service has struggled in recent years, has a high
profile and a reputation for tough questioning. In
Rochdale the OSC supported a proposed restructuring of services, which
has been attacked as a downgrading of local services. Local Liberal Democrat
MP Paul Rowen has steadfastly opposed changes and his party sees it as a
major issue in the local elections. OSCs look set to become the forums on
which public concern about local service redesigns are vocalised.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health Service Journal 4 May 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
The largest NHS trust in the north-west of England announced plans to
axe nearly 10% of its staff yesterday in an attempt to eliminate a £21m
deficit. Pennine Acute trust said it would remove 800 posts at its hospitals
in
Bury, north Manchester, Oldham and Rochdale - one of the largest job
losses to emerge since the NHS went into a period of retrenchment two months
ago. John Carvel , social affairs editor
Saturday May 6, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
800 NHS jobs
face the axe. Up to 800 jobs could go at four hospitals in
Greater Manchester. Doctors and nurses could face the axe in massive
cuts at the Pennine Acute Trust, which runs North Manchester General,
Rochdale Infirmary, the Royal Oldham Hospital, and Fairfield Hospital at
Bury. Staff have had no warning and no consultation from the trust, which is
£21m in debt. The figure of 800 job losses equates to one in 11 among the
9,000 workforce.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of
Manchester Evening News 5 May 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
NHS managers are offering "bribes" to GPs to persuade them to send patients
to a private treatment centre instead of local NHS hospitals, it emerged
last night. The unorthodox payments came to light in the primary care trust
covering the Leigh constituency of the health minister, Andy Burnham. An
investigation by Hospital Doctor magazine found GPs in the area were being
paid £30 for every patient sent to
Greater Manchester surgical centre, a private unit run by the South
African operator Netcare. John Carvel, social affairs editor
Thursday May 11, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
GPs are offered
£30 'bribe' for private centre referral. GPs are being offered a
£30-per-patient 'bung' to refer patients to an underused independent sector
treatment centre run by Netcare. Figures from
Ashton, Leigh and Wigan PCT showed only 243 patients had been treated at
the centre up to February this year, compared with an expected level of 711.
Earlier figures from September last year show the PCT had paid out almost
£500,000 to that point for operations not carried out. A spokeswoman for the
General Medical Council said it was "concerned the standards may have been
breached".
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 12 May 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS Direct, the nurse-led
health helpline, will today axe more than 1,000 staff in a comprehensive
restructuring of branches and business objectives, the Guardian has learned.
Proposals will be presented for consultation with staff unions to close 12
call centres across England and shed more than a quarter of the workforce to
avert a forecast £15m deficit for 2006-07. The move follows an announcement
yesterday by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS trust that it plans to shed
1,200 jobs to avoid a deficit of £60m - caused partly by a new
payment-by-results system introduced last month. The Nottingham cuts - like
most of the 13,000 hospital job losses over the past few months - will be
achieved largely through staff turnover, with few compulsory redundancies.
But NHS Direct said up to 114 of its nurses may be sacked, along with
managers and administrators. NHS Direct was founded in 1997 to provide a
24-hour telephone helpline advising patients on how to deal with symptoms
and where to go in an emergency. It handles about 6.5m calls a year and its
website attracts 1m visits a month. This side of its business is likely to
grow, but a report to staff today admits the organisation has failed to meet
targets for expanding into new areas. It expected to get the lion's share of
contracts for call centres for patients wanting to see a GP outside working
hours - but got only 20% of the business. It also runs an appointments line
to support the choose and book system that enables patients to fix an
outpatient appointment at a convenient time at the hospital of their choice.
Delays in installing necessary IT equipment in hospitals and GP surgeries
slowed this income stream. It says it can no longer afford to run many of
the smaller call centres. The proposals call for the closure of centres in
Doncaster,
Scunthorpe, York,
Chester,
Bolton,
Preston, Chorley,
Southport,
Cambridge,
Croydon,
Brighton and
Kensington, London. They will shut over the next 18 months and staff
will be made redundant unless they can be redeployed. Eighteen call centres
will be expanded.John Carvel, social affairs editor
Tuesday May 16, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
The Department
of Health does not support any payment being made to GPs as an
"inducement" to refer patients to any particular provider (GPs offered
payments to send patients private, May 11), nor has it seen any evidence
that this has occurred. GPs do receive payment for pre-operative work, but
this is payment for additional work done. If the patient chooses to go to
the
Greater Manchester
Surgical Centre,
they may need some preparatory tests, such as blood tests etc.
Traditionally, this would involve one or more hospital outpatient
appointments. But for some procedures it is now possible for these to be
carried out by a GP who has had extra training. This benefits patients as it
can be undertaken more quickly and conveniently, and frees up hospital
consultants' time. We understand that the PCT approved a payment of £30 a
patient in recognition of the extra work needed. We have reiterated that any
payments to GPs must be for services not for any other reason. Norman Warner
Minister of state for NHS Reform. Letter Guardian 19 May 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
GPs advised to reject 'bungs'. Medical defence bodies, LMCs and GP
leaders have strongly advised GPs to reject 'enhanced payments' on offer to
refer patients to independent sector treatment centres. The advice came in
the wake of
Ashton, Leigh and Wigan PCT's offer of £30 per patient for GPs to refer
patients to Greater Manchester
Surgical Centre,
which is run by the South African firm Netcare. Despite the GMC saying it
was 'concerned' GPs would be breaking Good Medical Practice guidelines if
they accepted the offer, the PCT has refused to scrap it.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 19 May 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
'Fee was not
inducement'. Health minister Lord Warner has approved a PCT's £30 per
patient payment to GPs for referring to an
independent sector
treatment centre. In a letter to the Guardian, Lord Warner said
Ashton Leigh and Wigan PCT's payment to GPs for referring to Greater
Manchester Surgical Centre, was not an "inducement" but for additional
screening of patients.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 2 June 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
The chairwoman of an NHS trust is set to attack
Government health reforms which, she claims, threaten the future of the
service. Debbie Abrahams, chair of
Rochdale Primary Care trust, will tell a protest rally in Manchester she
is speaking out before the health service reaches "the point of no return".
She will say: "I believe passionately in the NHS. For me it is not just
about how we organise and provide health care, it reflects and represents
the values of our society." And she will continue: "During my period as
chair of Rochdale PCT, I have seen a steady stream of national policies
introduced - Foundation
Trusts, Choice,
Independent
Treatment Centres and now Commissioning a
Patient led NHS - which threaten these values and the future of a NHS
that is equitable and free at the point of need."
Press
Association Saturday June 24, 2006 10:03 AM |
| |
|
|
|
|
GPs turn the
tables to win. Dr Martin Whiting has won the contract to run a
neighbouring practice after tendering with a corporate-style business plan.
He and his seven partners in north
Manchester beat off competition from several private companies to win
the contract to run the Newton Heath practice in Cheetham.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 9 June 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
NHS trusts pledge
to copy Tesco business methods. NHS chief executives have promised to
follow "lean" management techniques that have been adopted by successful
companies like Tesco and Toyota. By redesigning procedures around patients
and focusing on reducing the transfer time from area to area, such as A&
E to operating theatre, the trusts hope to save lives and reduce
costs. A test of the approach in
Bolton cut mortality rates by at least a third. Summary
by Keep our NHS
Public of
Guardian 15 June 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Hospital
staff in protest over cuts. More than 1,000 NHS staff angry at plans to
slash hundreds of jobs within the trust which runs Fairfield and North
Manchester general hospitals will be protesting at the weekend. The
Pennine Acute NHS Hospital Trust is being forced to axe up to 800 jobs
within its four hospitals at Fairfield, North Manchester, The Royal Oldham
and Rochdale Infirmary although union representatives claim that figure is
more likely to be around 1,200. Staff from the trust have joined together to
form "Keep Our NHS Public" and will be demonstrating on Saturday June 24 at
Victoria Station in Manchester at 11.30am. Karen Reissmann, UNISON health
service executive member, said: "The NHS faces massive cuts in jobs.
Accident and emergency services may have to close, mental health is in
crisis and maternity and baby care is under threat in Bury. These cuts and
job losses will devastate health services. The Government could easily
afford to pay the current NHS debt, which is less than one per cent of its
total budget. This is a direct result of their privatisation policies. We
demand that the government gives the NHS the money and keeps our NHS
public."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of This
is Lancashire 19 June 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Staff to join
jobs demo. Health workers and patients are being urged to join a
demonstration in Manchester to persuade the government to give
Pennines Acute NHS Trust more time to pay back its £28m debt. Unison
bosses have called upon people in the trust's area of Oldham, North
Manchester, Bury and Rochdale to turn up to the march at 11:30am on Saturday
June 24th from Victoria Station to Piccadilly Gardens. The trust has already
announced 800 job losses but Unison officials believe it will be closer to
1,200 after including part-time staff and low-paid workers. Karen Reissmann,
Unison executive member attacked the government saying it "could easily
afford to pay the current NHS debt, which is less than one percent of its
total budget. This (the cuts) is a direct result of their privatisation
policies." She went on to "demand that the Government gives the NHS the
money and keeps our NHS public." Trust officials have not ruled out
compulsory redundancies and the projected 800 job losses would amount to one
in eleven in the trust, the second largest in the country. Local politicians
have been invited to speak at a rally after the march, under the banner of
Keep Our NHS Public. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Oldham
Advertiser 23 June 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Chair quits over
private power. A primary care trust chair has resigned in protest at the
increasing role of the private sector in the NHS.
Rochdale PCT chair Debbie Abrahams said: "The NHS will be a very
different animal if we continue to increase the amount of private sector
provision. Ultimately, the private sector is in it to make money." She added
that when an independent treatment centre opened in Manchester, "we were
told what the levels of activity were and what investment we should make
whether we needed it or not". The strategic health authority negotiated the
contract for the Greater Manchester Surgical Centre without involving the
PCT, she said, and instructed the board to agree to the use of the centre
"without having seen the contract documents". As a result, the PCT got a £2m
bill for capacity it did not use in the first six months of operations. Ms
Abrahams appealed to health secretary Patricia Hewitt for an independent
evaluation of the impact of the private sector on local NHS services, but
this was rejected. The "final straw" was when her attempts to assess the
impact of the surgical centre were blocked. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health
Service Journal
29 June 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
The five specialist
orthopaedic hospitals in England may have to abandon complex surgery on hips and
bones because of a bizarre twist in the government's rules to turn the NHS into
a competitive market, chief executives warned last night. In a private briefing
paper for MPs, they said patients are set to become the victims of the health
secretary Patricia Hewitt's new system of
payment by results. They observed
that much routine orthopaedic surgery is being diverted into private sector
treatment centres,
leaving the five NHS centres of excellence to concentrate on more highly skilled
work. However, they said the national price list for every type of operation did
not recognise the extra costs of more difficult work. The five hospitals are:
the Royal National Orthopaedic hospital at Stanmore,
Middlesex; the
Nuffield Orthopaedic centre in
Oxford;
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt hospital in Oswestry,
Shropshire; Royal Orthopaedic hospital in
Birmingham; and Wrightington hospital in
Wigan.
John Carvel, social affairs editor
Thursday
July 6, 2006 The Guardian |
| |
|
|
|
|
GPs in 'bung' victory. GPs are claiming a 'pyrrhic victory' after a
PCT scrapped a controversial scheme to pay them for referring to an
independent sector
treatment centre. Ashton, Leigh and Wigan PCT has ditched the £30 per
patient 'enhanced payment' to send more patients to the underused
Greater Manchester Surgical Centre. It was widely condemned by GPs as a
'bung'. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 30 June 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Save our baby
unit! The fight against proposed cuts at Wythenshawe hospital's
premature baby unit was given a boost with the launch of the "Save Our Baby
Unit" campaign. Health workers, activists and local residents at the launch
were furious at the cuts, which managers call "Making It Better". Management
want only a "stabilisation cot" to remain at Wythenshawe, with neonatal
services "concentrated" in central
Manchester, Oldham, etc. Save Our Baby Unit agreed to affiliate to Keep
Our NHS Public, and to support all moves towards a national anti-cuts
demonstration, linking campaigns across the country. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Socialist
4 July 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Axed wards win a
reprieve. Two
Altrincham hospital wards at the centre of an NHS cash row could reopen
after a landmark High Court decision. Health bosses closed the last two
wards at Altrincham General Hospital in March, claiming they had no choice
because patient safety was at risk, but admitted it would also save vital
cash towards their £9m debt. But campaigners refused to accept the closure
of the two rehabilitation wards, and won the right for a full judicial
review. At a preliminary hearing, Mr Justice Collins ruled that Health In
Trafford, led by former Altrincham General nurse Pat Morris, had an
"arguable case" that Trafford Healthcare Trust's decision was "unlawful"
because of a lack of consultation. In the meantime, the judge has asked that
the Trust consider reopening the wards, to the delight of Mrs Morris. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Manchester
Metro 5 July 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Save our baby
unit! A campaign has been formed to defend maternity services at
Wythenshawe Hospital. The Save Our Baby Unit campaign opposes the
potential loss of four beds in Wythenshawe Hospital's intensive care
neonatal unit, leaving seriously ill premature babies facing helicopter
transfers to other hospitals. Campaign organiser Lynn Worthington said: "NHS
managers plan to run down the neonatal intensive care unit at Wythenshawe
Hospital. There will be less beds and less specialised staff, which means
prematurely born babies may have to be flown by helicopter across Greater
Manchester, possibly as far as Oldham. We talked to many people whose
children had been in the unit. They are all opposed to the closure. And
staff are also against the cuts. The facilities are there because they are
necessary - they're not just some corner that axe-wielding managers can cut.
We'll be battling to retain full neonatal services at Wythenshawe - and not
at the expense of other facilities." Save Our Baby Unit has affiliated to
Keep Our NHS Public. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Wythenshawe
World 5 July 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Specialist trusts
lobby ministers for change in tariff. Britain's five specialist orthopaedic
hospitals say they could be forced to cancel operations and cut services unless
the government adjusts the payment by
results tariff. A briefing paper provided to MPs by the hospitals says: "The
NHS's current financial situation is making financial balance a non-negotiable
requirement and if the national tariff is not amended to recognise complex cases
some trusts will have no way of avoiding serious financial loss. This situation
could result in trusts being forced to end provision of vital specialist
services: ones that are not available in normal acute trusts."
London Royal
National Orthopaedic Hospital chief executive Andrew Woodhead said the tariff
system as it stood would mean his trust lost £5m a year: "We would be faced with
a position where the only way to balance the books was to stop doing operations
that lose us money. We could not continue to operate with a £5m loss of income."
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital chief executive Jackie Daniel
said the projected losses were hampering specialist trusts' efforts to gain
foundation status. Some service cuts may have to take place before 2008 to
convince regulator Monitor that the organisation is ready to become a
foundation trust.
Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh chief executive Sheena Cuminsky blamed
independent treatment
centres for taking less complex patients: "The more this happens, the more
complex cases are left for us which are higher than tariff." Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health
Service Journal 6 July 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
PCTs oppose
Manchester maternity shake-up. Plans for a shake-up of children's and
maternity services in
Manchester are under fire because one corner of the city could be left
without inpatient services. Two primary care trusts in north-east Manchester
are calling for an option to be devised which would keep inpatient
paediatrics, obstetrics and neonatal care in the area. Fairfield General
Hospital in Bury is the preferred setting. NHS organisations in Greater
Manchester have just finished consulting on proposals which would leave the
communities above the M60/ 62
motorway without inpatient maternity and children's services. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health
Service Journal 6 July 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Health trust
loan after wages crisis. Pennine Acute Hospital Trust has requested a
£17m loan to avoid not being able to pay wages from January to April next
year. The trust, which covers hospitals in Bury, North Manchester, Rochdale
and Oldham, has a forecast £21m end-of-year debt, and admits that any loan
would not be the end of their financial problems. The trust announced a
possible 800 job cuts earlier in the year and has already gone £3.5m in the
red since April. Unison called for involvement in any binding recovery plan
before it was submitted to the
Greater Manchester reserve fund. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Manchester
Evening News 14 July 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Fury as 'anti-competitive' £30m contract awarded. South African-owned
private healthcare company Netcare looks set to win a £30m-a-year contract
to provide clinical assessment services across
Manchester, even though it owns and runs the Greater Manchester surgical
centre. Netcare will be awarded preferred bidder status for the integrated
clinical assessment and treatment services (ICATS) contract by the end of
July. However, NHS sources close to the discussions have raised concerns
over whether this is anti-competitive. If Netcare wins the five-year deal,
the company will, controversially, be able to assess patients for surgery
and then refer them to its own surgical centre for treatment. In January,
private providers were invited to bid for the work to provide ICATS in
general surgery, musculoskeletal, ear, nose and throat, gynaecology and
urology services. A source close to the talks said the DoH's decision to
award the contract to Netcare was "ludicrous". "By doing this, Netcare will
be able to sew up the market, assessing patients to see if they need acute
treatment and then advising and referring those patients for treatment at
its own surgical centre." Sources close to the DoH said that in response to
local concerns, the ICATS contract would be split and shared with another
private provider, Partnership Health Group, in partnership with Alliance
Medical. Both companies will have preferred bidder status by the end of the
month. Last year, Netcare's Greater Manchester surgical centre was found to
have lost the local health economy nearly £2m in its first six months. A
confidential report revealed that the 14 PCTs commissioning from the centre
had had to shell out £1.9m to Netcare, even though the centre was being
underused by patients. ICATS contracts form part of the second stage of the
DoH's independent treatment centre procurement programme for elective
services. Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health
Service Journal 20 July 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Crisis
hospital can't give blood tests. A Hospital in
Trafford is so short-staffed it cannot offer simple blood tests for
patients referred by their GPs for a day. Bosses at cash-strapped Trafford
Healthcare Trust have sent letters to all doctors in the area saying that,
because of staff sickness, no blood will be taken at Stretford Memorial
Hospital. The move means that dozens of patients across north Trafford will
be unable to have their blood examined, as up to 40 patients a day are
referred to the centre by their GPs. Because of the closure, patients in the
area will have to travel to Trafford General Hospital, about five miles
away. The staffing crisis comes after the trust shut two wards at Altrincham
General Hospital, a move aimed at easing £9m debts.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Manchester
Evening News 4 August 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
PCT denies
limiting choice to independent sector.
Stockport PCT has denied claims that it is limiting
patient choice for orthopaedic
patients to the local private sector. In a move which appears to run counter
to the government's choice agenda, the PCT has sent letters to orthopaedic
patients informing them that it cannot offer patients in need of orthopaedic
surgery the option of treatment at an NHS hospital. The letter warns
patients that their surgery "may take place at an
independent
(private) hospital". It goes on: "At present we are unable to offer NHS
hospitals as a choice for surgery at this point in the pathway." The local
foundation trust is seeking clarification from the PCT on its processes
after telling them that they did not feel patients were being offered
"genuine choice". Stockport PCT chief executive Richard Popplewell said the
PCT was not denying patients an NHS option. He insisted the letter had been
sent to patients who had already opted to use the independent sector at the
point they were referred by GPs. He said: "This is stage three or choice
three of the patient pathway when the patients have already chosen to use
the independent sector." After warning patients that the PCT is "unable" to
offer NHS choices, the letter, penned by the PCT's senior patient choice
nurse, goes on to say that patients can change their mind: "If you decide
that you would prefer to be treated in totality at an NHS hospital then you
need to contact me ASAP. You will then be given a choice of four or five NHS
providers. We will then process your referral in the normal way to an
outpatient appointment with a consultant." The foundation trust said it had
not received a "satisfactory explanation" from the PCT. A spokesman said:
"This letter and the PCT process seems to require patients to proactively
opt out of a process that leads them into the independent sector. So far we
do not feel patients are being offered a genuine choice." Foundation Trust
Network director Sue Slipman expressed concern about what the letter
appeared to suggest: "There was always a worry that commissioners would slow
down the work going to hospitals because the contracts with the private
sector are take-or-pay contracts. This is completely against patient
choice." Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health
Service Journal 10 August 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
Just seven of
these midwives found a job. Student midwives in
Salford are jobless because
hospitals cannot afford new staff. Just seven out
of 35 graduates on a degree course at Salford University have secured work,
some by offering to travel to the south. In a usual year all students would
have found work locally by now, as the number of places on the three-year
training course is dictated by local health bosses according to need. But
this year 28 students have had replies from hospitals across the region
telling them there is a recruitment freeze because of the massive debts they
have built up. The move comes after Pennine Acute Trust in north east
Manchester announced it would shed 325 jobs and Royal Bolton Hospitals Trust
said 130 jobs will be axed. Sarah Davies, a lecturer in midwifery at Salford
University, said: "This means there is going to be a shortage of midwives.
This is the start of a crisis, and we are talking about mothers' and babies'
lives."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Manchester
Evening News 11 August 2006 |
| |
|
3 |
|
|
NHS life-blood
'consumed by clinics'. Health authorities are
spending millions of pounds of taxpayers' money on private operations in
the North West which could be provided more cheaply by the NHS and may
eventually destroy the service, say critics. Hospital consultants, health
unions and politicians in the region are protesting at the block contracts
being awarded to
Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTCs) to carry out thousands of
operations, regardless of whether they reach targets set for them. Health
trusts in the North West have paid £1.7m to
Greater Manchester Surgical Centre, run by South African company
Netcare, for operations that never took place. These were mainly minor
surgical procedures, including hip operations, ear, nose and throat
treatment and cataract removal. This week doctors, nurses and Unison members
condemned the "breakneck" pace of privatisation within the NHS. Protest
groups have been set up in Manchester and
Liverpool under the "Keep Our NHS Public" banner. At least a further
five new ISTCs are being planned, without public consultation, for the
region. These include: Ormskirk and District General Hospital, where BUPA
will provide up to 1,000 operations a year for Southport and Ormskirk
Hospital NHS Trust, which recently announced that it is to axe 83 NHS jobs
due to a £15m deficit; a centre in
Cumbria or Lancashire; two further ISTCs in Greater Manchester; and a
second ISTC in either Cheshire or Merseyside (there is already one at
Runcorn). Deputy chairman of the BMA's consultants' committee and consultant
gynaecologist at Fairfield Hospital, Bury, said: "Ultimately, this could
lead to total disruption of NHS care and the closure of NHS orthopaedic
wards. I'm worried about the quality of surgery and the risk of
complications. A recent study by a surgeon at Bolton Hospital found there
were six times more infections with eye cataract operations in ISTCs than in
NHS treatment centres." Netcare is also likely to win a £30m contract to
provide clinical assessment services in Manchester, which would allow it to
refer patients to its own Greater Manchester Surgical Centre, based at
Trafford General Hospital. In addition, Netcare subsidiary Amicus InHealth
is bidding for the North West's diagnostics contract, which would involve
carrying out blood tests, MRI scans, ultrasounds, X Rays and endoscopies.
The Department of Health refused to comment on how much the five-year
regional diagnostics contract will cost, but seven contracts nationally are
worth £1 billion. The Greater Manchester Surgical Centre costs the NHS £10m
a year.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of North
West Enquirer 11 August 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Help for GPs to
compete on APMS. A PCT that is putting four practices it directly
manages out to tender has pledged to help the incumbent GPs compete with
major private providers.
Salford PCT has promised that managers will assist salaried GPs in
preparing a bid, including giving advice on how how they might be able to
collaborate with other practices or providers. The trust, which plans to set
up Chinese Walls to ensure impartiality, has also promised patients' views
will be taken into account in deciding criteria to judge the bidders'
proposals and in evaluating bids. It has made the pledges in order to avoid
the accusations of bias that have plagued similar tenders in
Sunderland and
Derbyshire. Mike Burrows, chief executive of Salford PCT, said tendering
was the best way to evaluate all models of care, including the private
sector and social enterprise. He said he was acutely aware of the furore
that occurred in Derbyshire and had deliberately taken a more even-handed
approach.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Pulse 11 August 2006. |
| |
|
|
|
|
Netcare lead bidder for ICATS. The Department of Health has named
Netcare and Partnership Health Group - in partnership with Alliance Medical
- as preferred bidders for its controversial
integrated
clinical assessment and treatment services in
Manchester. The proposed contract has been dogged by criticism from
local stakeholders in recent months as concerns were raised that awarding
Netcare the contract would be anti-competitive. If Netcare wins the
five-year deal to provide ICATS it would be in a position to assess patients
for surgery and then refer them to its own Greater Manchester surgical
centre for treatment. The deal will see Netcare providing 220,000
outpatient, diagnostic and surgical services in seven locations including
Carlisle, Preston, Fylde Coast, Ulverston, Pendle, Ormskirk and Workington.
In response to local concerns the DoH has decided to ensure that preferred
bidder status for the two parts of the contract are awarded to different
providers. The DoH has also named UK Specialist Hospitals - formerly part of
the New York Presbyterian Hospitals group - as preferred bidder for a
second-wave elective independent treatment centre in the South West. UKSH
will operate an ITC based in North
Bristol that will carry out 25,000 procedures a year over five years.
Last month Bupa was named preferred bidder for two elective ITC schemes in
the North East and
Cheshire and Merseyside.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health
Service Journal 17 August 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Future of 10
hospitals 'in doubt'. At least 10 major hospitals in England face potential
closure or a downgraded role, according to a BBC investigation. Talks are under
way about removing emergency care from hospitals in
London,
Surrey,
Sussex,
Greater
Manchester,
Lancashire and
Cornwall. The sites will either close or be left to handle basic care, with
"super" regional centres seeing the most ill. There are concerns people will
have to travel miles for life-saving treatment. Over 30 hospitals could be
affected by the reviews - including those losing services and others left to
bear the brunt of that work. NHS bosses involved in the reviews have said the
measures are part of a push to provide more care in the community, either with
hospital doctors setting up local clinics, GPs providing extra specialist
services or medics treating patients in their own homes. However, they also
acknowledge deficits and new European working time restrictions are forcing them
to reconsider how services are provided. Dr Jonathan Fielden, deputy chairman of
the BMA consultants' committee, said: "In some of these cases we have to ask
whether this is being driven by financial reasons. If this is the case, it is
likely not to be in the best interests of patients." The areas under review are:
London - Talks under way over Harrow's Northwick Park and the nearby Central
Middlesex hospitals. Project board set up to review services across the four
north central trusts - Barnet and Chase Farm, Royal Free, Whittington and North
Middlesex Surrey and Sussex - Widespread discussions have been followed by the
creation of focus groups to discuss future of the 15 hospitals run by nine NHS
trusts. Formal consultation to start in the autumn. Greater Manchester -
Committee set up to decide the future of four hospitals run by the Pennine Acute
Hospitals NHS Trust. Decision due end of September. Lancashire - Changes to the
University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay Trust's three centres - spread across
Cumbria and Lancashire, planned, with the Westmorland threatened with losing its
acute facilities. Cornwall - Two proposals have been discussed by Royal Cornwall
Hospitals NHS Trust, one of which involves withdrawing services from two of its
three hospitals.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 18 August 2006 |
| |
2 |
3 |
|
|
Plans to use private sector money
to build and maintain six NHS hospitals worth nearly £1.5bn were
approved by health ministers yesterday, prompting anger among public sector
unions that foreshadows a revolt at Labour's annual conference in Manchester
next month. The six schemes, including facilities in health secretary
Patricia Hewitt's constituency in Leicester, were scaled down to take
account of the government's proposals for moving some services from
hospitals into the community. This cut the cost by more than £400m. Unison,
the biggest public sector union, said the decision to build the hospitals
under the private finance initiative (PFI) would prove "a costly error",
locking NHS trusts into inflexible repayment obligations that would burden
their balance sheets for 30 years or more. The union is expected to be
heavily critical of NHS privatisation at the Labour conference. The six
developments took the hospital building programme since Labour came to power
in 1997 to more than £10bn, almost all using using the PFI. But the clarity
of the government's message about NHS expansion was muddied by the results
of a BBC investigation of hospital cuts planned in
other parts of the country. It said these may involve the closure or
downgrading of at least 10 big hospitals, but the Department of Health said
nothing was finalised and preparations for "reconfiguration of services"
were at an early stage. The six schemes will be at:
· University Hospitals
Leicester - a £711m development including a brand new women's hospital
and a stand alone children's hospital at the Leicester Royal infirmary. The
original proposals would have cost £906m.
· University Hospital North
Staffordshire - £272m to build a community hospital and cancer centre.
· South
Devon Healthcare - £163m to redevelop Torbay hospital, including a
diagnostic centre offering MRI scans, more single rooms and day-case
operating theatres.
·
Walsall Hospitals NHS Trust - £140m for the complete redevelopment of
the Manor hospital site.
·
Salford Royal Hospitals - £112m for a new hospital with more single
rooms, an enhanced A&E department and three new operating theatres.
·
Tameside and Glossop Acute Services - £68m for three day-case operating
theatres, new surgical wards and a 30- place day hospital for elderly mental
health patients.
John Carvel, social affairs editor
Saturday August 19, 2006 The Guardian
|
| |
|
|
|
|
14 private firms win place on choice menu in £200m deal. The
Department of Health has signed a deal worth £200m with 14 independent
healthcare companies to carry out thousands of additional elective care
procedures. The contracts, signed last week, are intended to deliver an
additional 150,000 procedures per year, on an 'ad hoc' basis, as part of the
DoH's second wave of
elective care
private sector procurement. The 14 companies will be added immediately
to the central extended choice menu, which currently consists of all
foundation trusts and some independent treatment centres. Under the policy,
patients awaiting elective care can choose from this list, as well as from
at least four local providers. Seven of the big name private healthcare
companies have won a large chunk of the work. BMI Healthcare, part of the
Netcare group, is the biggest winner, securing 44 contracts across the
country. Other contract winners include Bupa, Nuffield, Capio, Centres for
Clinical Excellence, Mercury Health, and Nations Healthcare. Several small
private companies are also understood to have won small contracts to provide
local services to NHS patients. Each contract will run for five years and
the private companies will provide NHS patients with a range of elective
care services including general surgery, endoscopy, ophthalmology, plastic
surgery and neurology. Unlike the first-wave elective care contracts, where
PCTs had to pay for the number of procedures contracted - even if they did
not use the capacity - the latest deals will [not] operate under a 'take or
pay' arrangement, which means PCTs only pay for work carried out. Earlier
this month, the DoH named Netcare and Partnership Health Group, in
partnership with Alliance Medical, as preferred bidders for its
controversial integrated assessment and treatment services in
Manchester. At the same time the DoH also signed a deal with UK
Specialist Hospitals, formerly part of the New York Presbyterian Hospitals
group, to act as preferred bidder for a second-wave elective independent
treatment centre in the South West.
Last month Bupa was named preferred bidder for two elective independent
treatment centre schemes in the North
East and
Cheshire and Merseyside as part of its wave-two elective care
procurement programme.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health
Service Journal 31 August 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
10,000 say 'no'
to hospital stitch up. More than 10,000 people have signed their name in
protest to threatened services at North
Manchester General Hospital. The hugely successful campaigns prompted
thousands to make their mark by signing petitions and sending letters of
complaint. Due to the wealth of responses the decision, which was expected
to be made by health bosses by September, has had to be postponed until
December. The 'Making It Better' consultation could see accident and
emergency services and maternity services moved from North Manchester
General Hospital to hospitals in Bury and Oldham. A bitter battle has seen
thousands of people rise up in protest to the changes which they believe
would put hundreds of people at risk. Collectively, campaigns and petitions
across the city have generated an unprecedented 50,000 responses from the
public, patients and staff during the four-month consultation period between
January and May this year.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Middleton
Guardian 1 September 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
NHS shake-up is
facing legal challenge. An MP is threatening legal action which could
derail an "urgent" reorganisation of regional health services. Health bosses
are expected to agree provisionally to replace
Rochdale Infirmary's emergency department with an urgent care centre and
to stop emergency surgery at Rochdale and Fairfield Hospital, Bury, at a
meeting on September 14. They have spent the past year reviewing services to
800,000 people in Bury, North Manchester, Rochdale, Oldham, Heywood and
Middleton and Rossendale because they say specialist staff and resources are
spread too thinly over the area's four hospitals. But Paul Rowen, MP for
Rochdale, claims managers at Pennine Acute Hospital Trust are trying to
pre-empt the review's outcome by closing some services at the infirmary
before next week. Mr Rowen, who is now taking legal advice on bringing a
judicial review and making preparations to gain legal aid, said: "The review
has cost a huge amount of money and created a huge amount of responses, yet
before the announcement of the outcome services are already being moved."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Manchester
Evening News 7 September 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
Report calls for
'radical action' to plug Manchester health gap. 'Concerted radical
action' is required to plug the growing
health inequalities
gap across
Greater Manchester, according to a report from the Audit Commission. The
review found there is 'no clear leadership for the health inequalities
agenda' in the region. It criticises 'constant' local and national
reconfiguration for preventing progress in reducing the health inequalities
gap and says reconfiguration in the NHS 'is damaging the potential for more
successful joint developments'. The report concludes that leadership of the
health inequalities agenda in Greater Manchester is often via the director
of public health and says that changes to acute services are driven by new
builds and clinical services without any 'explicit' expectation that change
will lead to improved health. Faculty of Public Health president Professor
Rod Griffiths said he was not surprised by the findings: 'A lot of this is
to do with the government's manic desire to keep reorganising the health
service it does not say much for the government's vision that health
inequalities in Greater Manchester are still so bad.'
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Health
Service Journal
7 September 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Hospital crusader
faces £80,000 bill. A pensioner is risking financial ruin to save wards
at her local hospital. Former nurse Pat Morris has been warned she could
have to pay up to £80,000 if a judge rules against her on Monday. She hoped
to get Legal Aid in her battle to challenge the closure of two
rehabilitation wards at
Altrincham General Hospital, but now she has been told her application
has been turned down. The Legal Services Commission, which administers Legal
Aid, rejected the request by Health in Trafford (HIT) - a protest group
headed by Morris. If she loses her case she will be handed a bill estimated
between £70,000 and £80,000 for the legal costs of the health trust and the
court for staging the judicial review. Morris's six-month battle is expected
to end in the Royal Court of Justice in London when her barrister, acting
for free, will argue Trafford Healthcare Trust (THT) "unlawfully" closed the
last in-patient wards at Altrincham because they
failed to carry out public consultation. Trafford hospital bosses closed
the two wards in March, claiming they had no choice because patient safety
was at risk - but admitted it would also save cash. At the last hearing, Mr
Justice Collins ordered THT bosses to consider re-opening the wards, but
they decided not to. Mrs Morris has so far funded the legal bid and a series
of protest meetings herself, collecting only a few hundred pounds in
donations. The HIT protest group is furious at the way the Legal Aid
application was handled. HIT member Judie Collins has written to Vera Baird
MP, who oversees Legal Aid, to investigate. She claims the aid was refused
because of a mix-up over a phone interview and because Legal Aid officials
over-estimated the amount of funds the protest group had. Ms Collins said:
"This claim has been entirely mismanaged. It was rejected on the most
surprising of grounds of inability to make contact at a pre-arranged
conference call. Whatever the reason, I was surprised that a single bungled
call could dismiss a case of such importance to an individual without a
second opportunity. A second confusion is an assertion that HIT is a fully
constituted organisation with substantial resources and membership. There
has never been a formal group organisation, canvassing for membership or
mechanism for collecting or soliciting funds."
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Manchester
Evening News 8 September 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Retired nurse
risks her life savings to keep wards open. A former nurse has risked her
life savings by launching a High Court action in an attempt to overturn the
closure of two hospital wards. Pat Morris, 65, is funding the legal case
herself and may be ruined financially if she loses. Mrs Morris is
challenging a decision by the
Trafford Healthcare NHS Trust to close two rehabilitation wards for the
elderly at the Altrincham General Hospital near Manchester. She has sunk
£80,000 of her own savings into a judicial review of the decision to close
the wards. She was refused legal aid because her husband has a pension, even
though she only has a state pension of £34 a week. If the pensioner loses
the judicial review, she will be liable for the costs of the trust and the
court, but her barrister, Anthony Eyers, is acting for her on a pro bono
basis. If Ms Morris wins, the trust will be forced to reopen the wards. At
the High Court yesterday, Mr Eyers said that the trust had acted unlawfully
in failing to consult the public about the closure of the wards properly. He
told the court: "It would open the door for other trusts to act first and
ask questions later." Parishil Patel, for the trust, said he accepted the
trust had failed to consult correctly over the closure but the trust was
prepared now to start a series of meetings with the public. He said the
decision had been taken originally because of fears over clinical safety at
the wards, but the wards were also a serious fire risk. A decision from Mr
Justice Hodge is expected next week.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of Independent
12 September 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Lifeline for
maternity units. Under-threat maternity, baby and children's in- patient
services in Bury and Rochdale could be saved. As part of the Making It
Better review,
Greater Manchester health bosses want to cut maternity and children's
beds from 14 to eight sites. Beds and clinics at Bury, Trafford and Rochdale
have been earmarked for closure since last December. But fewer than half of
the almost 55,000 people who responded to the plans backed any of the four
proposed options. Bosses will now consider five more options, including
in-patient services at Bury and Rochdale, and have delayed their decision on
the reorganisation until December. The new options also include the
possibility of Wythenshawe Hospital becoming one of three proposed
super-sites. The threatened closure of maternity and children's services at
Fairfield Hospital in Bury and Rochdale Infirmary sparked outrage from local
people and MPs. The campaign group Fairfield Baby Lifeline Society marched
through the streets and organised a 30,000-name petition. The campaign
received a huge boost in May when bosses at Bury PCT rejected all four
proposed options.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public of Manchester
Evening News 14 September 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Closure planned
for hospital A&E. An accident and emergency department at a hospital in
Greater Manchester is to be closed, health bosses have decided. The unit
at Rochdale Infirmary will be replaced with an "urgent care centre" dealing
with less serious casualties. The provisional decision was taken by a joint
committee of PCTs, who want the infirmary to become one of the UK's first
"locality hospitals". It will mean Rochdale patients needing life-saving
emergency treatment will use services at Fairfield Hospital in Bury, the
Royal Oldham or North Manchester General Hospital. The plans are part of a
wider "Healthy Futures" review of services.
Summary by
Keep our NHS Public
of BBC
Online 15 September 2006 |
| |
|
|
|
5 |
Nurse wins legal
fight against ward closures. A nurse who quit in order to fight NHS cuts
has won a legal battle over the closure of two wards. Pat Morris set up
Health in
Trafford and risked financial ruin to bring judicial proceedings against
plans to axe two wards at Altringham General Hospital. The high court ruled
that the cuts were illegal because Trafford Healthcare NHS Trust had faile | |