Impact of Inequality

Home ] Up ] The Campaign ] Petitions ] Events index ] Health Policy ] Democracy ] The NHS ] Talks Letters & Articles ] Contacts and Further Reading ]
 

  • DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 97/282 Thursday 16th October 1997 HEALTHY HOMES FOR HEALTHY LIVES
  • Minister Pledges Action To Tackle Health Inequalities For Lone Parents And Their Children.  Department of Health Press Release 98/023 Wednesday 21st January 1998
  • Our Healthier Nation - Publication Of The Green Paper On Public Health.  Department of Health  Press Release 98/050 Thursday 5th February 1998
  • Nhs To Have Legal Duty Of Ensuring Quality For First Time - Milburn.  Department of Health Press release 98/141 Monday 13th April 1998
  • Further Drive Towards National Standards Of High-Quality Healthcare - Frank Dobson Tackles "Unacceptable Variation" In Nhs Care And Treatment.  Department of Health Press Release 98/144 Thursday 16th April 1998
  • Poor Men Die Youngest - Minister Launches Booklet To Help Men To Help Themselves.  Department of Health Press Release 98/175 Monday 11th May 1998
  • Colin Guthrie (Letters, December 30) puts his finger on the key challenge for health policy. Research over the last two decades has shown that the bulk of the higher rates of sickness, accidents and deaths experienced by the poor is caused by obscene wealth gaps and the adverse psycho-social conditions that go with them. Japan, with relatively low gaps between rich and poor, has strikingly high life expectancy. Guardian letters, 10 January 2001.
  • Alan Milburn, the health secretary, will today signal a historic shift in NHS policy when he announces a 10-year plan to reduce infant mortality and premature adult deaths in the poorest parts of England. In a speech that is meant to unveil the "big idea" for Labour's general election manifesto on health, he will announce the first government targets to reduce the most flagrant examples of health inequalities that are blighting the lives of the poor. Unlike previous targets for reducing NHS waiting lists and increasing the input of re sources flowing into the service, the new targets will focus on health outcomes. Guardian 28 February 2001.
  • Labour's former health secretary berates the government's promotion of 'foundation' hospitals.  Frank Dobson Guardian Tuesday June 4, 2002
  • After the jubilation must come the reckoning.  There is far more inequality in Britain today than there was in 1977.  Polly Toynbee Guardian Wednesday June 5, 2002
  • Foundation hospitals will get the lions share of money and staff leaving NHS hospitals to languish, writes Geoff Martin.   Society Thursday June 6, 2002
  • Improving the health of the nation and reducing health inequalities is one of the government's key health policy priorities - but one that is proving stubbornly elusive to make quick progress on.  Guardian Monday June 24, 2002
  • Public health: the issue explained.  Patrick Butler Guardian Monday June 24, 2002
  • Caution urged over foundation hospitals plan.  Guardian Friday June 28, 2002
  • Africa has been let down by rich nations.  Leader Saturday June 29, 2002 The Guardian
  • PM rejects alarm at 'two-tier' NHS plan.  Cabinet adviser cautions against haste on decentralising hospitals.  John Carvel, social affairs editor Saturday June 29, 2002 The Guardian
  • Main points from the cross-cutting reviews.   Society Monday July 15, 2002
  • Comment: Cross cutting review: health inequalities.  New hope flowers in public health.  The chancellor's cross cutting review signals that the government has twigged that channelling more money into public health programmes will result in massive NHS savings in the long-term. It's about time, writes Geof Rayner.  Society  Wednesday July 17, 2002
  • As the incidence of Aids increases in sub-Saharan Africa, the Home Office approach to HIV-positive asylum seekers is becoming harsher.  Liz McGregor Guardian Wednesday July 31, 2002
  • Dobson lays into hospital changes.  Michael White, political editor Guardian Thursday August 8, 2002
  • The prime minister, Tony Blair, is to take personal charge of a government-wide commitment to tackling widening health inequalities in a move aimed at reducing the deep-rooted health gap between rich and poor. Patrick Butler Wednesday November 20, 2002
  • Old age and poverty sadly go hand in hand in many industrial cities and towns. But they are not the only areas where living on benefits is a harsh fact of life for older people. Mike George reports. Wednesday May 21, 2003 The Guardian
  • Government moves to increase patient choice are driving down waiting lists but could jeopardise equal access to healthcare, a prominent health thinktank has warned. Tash Shifrin Thursday June 5, 2003
  • Pushy, assertive patients who come to the surgery armed with lists of questions are taking more than their fair share of time with the doctor - at the expense of the less articulate. Jo Revill, health editor Sunday June 15, 2003 The Observer
  • The days when doctor knew best are long gone. Now the most effective way to get the healthcare you want is to be assertive. Luisa Dillner explains. Tuesday June 17, 2003 The Guardian
  • 'Pushy patients' have been accused of taking up unnecessarily lengthy appointment time with GPs at the expense of less assertive patients (News, last week).  Letters Sunday June 22, 2003 The Observer
  • The middle classes have more choice in an NHS that has failed poorer groups in society, the new health secretary, John Reid, admitted yesterday. Patrick Butler Friday June 27, 2003 The Guardian
  • The new health secretary, John Reid, today underlined his commitment to ensure that the NHS does more for poorer families with a new three-year plan to tackle widening health inequalities. Matt Weaver Wednesday July 2, 2003
  • The government's anti-poverty drive could grind to a halt unless a radical change is undertaken, a Cabinet Office paper has conceded. Patrick Wintour, chief political correspondent Thursday July 3, 2003 The Guardian
  • The poor are being punished by creeping erosion of free treatment under the NHS, the National Consumer Council (NCC) warns today after investigating increases in what people have to pay for prescriptions, eye tests and dental treatment. John Carvel Wednesday July 9, 2003 The Guardian
  • Local authorities and the NHS will be set targets to reduce health inequalities across England, the public health minister, Melanie Johnson has announced. David Batty Friday October 31, 2003
  • Middle-class people benefit more from the NHS than the poor, according to a report today from senior government advisers that overturns the long-standing boast of ministers that the health service's greatest virtue was fairness to all-comers. John Carvel, social affairs editor Friday November 7, 2003 The Guardian
  • It's not just the poor that are hit by the cold. Many middle-class OAPs suffer because they live in a single room and can afford little fuel, says Neasa MacErlean. Sunday November 9, 2003 The Observer
  • Agitators will inherit the earth. Every time the 'right to choose' is extended, the poor get second-best. Roy Hattersley Monday November 17, 2003 The Guardian
  • It's Labour's rebels who block choice. The critics are wrong - foundation hospitals trust patients to decide. John Reid Wednesday November 19, 2003 The Guardian
  • New medical chief to tackle inequalities. Tash Shifrin Friday November 21, 2003
  • Failed asylum seekers lose free NHS care. Gaby Hinsliff, chief political correspondent Sunday December 21, 2003 The Observer
  • Forcing foreigners to pay upfront for NHS treatment is immoral and likely to increase racism, the health secretary, John Reid, was warned yesterday as he revealed his plans to tackle "health tourism". Sarah Hall, political correspondent Monday December 29, 2003 The Guardian
  • Doctors' leaders warned last night that the profession would not act as an agent of the state to deny free treatment to foreign patients caught by rules against "health tourism" to be announced by the government today. John Carvel, social affairs editor Tuesday December 30, 2003 The Guardian
  • Patients who have foreign accents may be asked to show passports, visas, travel documents, payslips, bank records and council tax paybooks before getting free treatment on the NHS, under a government crackdown on "health tourists". John Carvel, social affairs editor Wednesday December 31, 2003 The Guardian
  • The government failed yesterday to justify its claim that health tourism costs British taxpayers "hundreds of millions of pounds a year" when it emerged that its evidence was an exaggeration of an unpublished submission from a debt collection agency in Gwynedd. John Carvel Wednesday December 31, 2003 The Guardian
  • Knowing when foreigners ought to be charged for NHS treatment is only part of the problem: recovering the money is often more of a headache. John Carvel Wednesday December 31, 2003 The Guardian
  • In place of fear. Leader Wednesday December 31, 2003 The Guardian
  • Closing the door on health tourists. Letters Thursday January 1, 2004 The Guardian
  • About 800,000 parents in poorer families will get free fruit and vegetables through a voucher system announced yesterday by John Reid, the health secretary.  John Carvel Tuesday February 17, 2004 The Guardian
  • Vivienne Parry finds that even classic medical research can be based on a one size fits all attitude. Thursday March 11, 2004 The Guardian
  • The leader of Britain's doctors warned yesterday that the government is creating a two-tier NHS where getting high-quality treatment will depend more on luck than clinical need. James Johnson, who chairs the British Medical Association, said ministers were in danger of destroying the character of the health service in their zeal for promoting patient choice and hitting political targets. John Carvel, social affairs editor Monday April 19, 2004 The Guardian
  • The government is to risk a clash with the medical profession by announcing a crackdown on failed asylum seekers and other non-EU nationals receiving free NHS treatment from GPs. The health minister John Hutton will publish proposals this month to make patients signing on with a family doctor sign a declaration that they are UK residents entitled to free care. John Carvel, social affairs editor Monday May 3, 2004 The Guardian
  • GPs will be required to find out if new patients have the right to live in the UK and, if not, they may charge for treatment under plans to crack down on health tourism. The government proposals are in response to a perception among some doctors and the public that the NHS is under pressure from foreigners visiting Britain to get free medical care. This concern is intertwined with suspicion of asylum seekers, many of whom are in need of some sort of treatment when they arrive. Sarah Boseley, health editor Saturday May 15, 2004 The Guardian
  • Britain's midwives are lining up to oppose plans to make them 'shop' asylum seekers or women from other EU countries who claim a free childbirth on the NHSJo Revill, health editor Sunday May 16, 2004 The Observer
  • Inequality is fattening. People will get thinner only when they have things that are worth staying thin for - self-esteem, social status and jobs. Polly Toynbee Friday May 28, 2004 The Guardian
  • Doctors have launched a campaign demanding "the best the NHS can offer" for asylum seekers and refugees and branding checks on patients' asylum status "unethical and inefficient". The Medical Practitioners' Union (MPU), part of the 'super-union' Amicus, has started a petition against government rules withholding NHS hospital care from asylum seekers whose claims have failed. Ministers are currently consulting on plans that will also exclude failed asylum seekers from receiving NHS GP services. Tash Shifrin Monday June 7, 2004
  • High rates of cancer and heart disease among the working classes will be tackled under government plans to narrow the 'health gap' between the rich and the poor. While deaths from the two major killers have been falling, the trend has been driven largely by rapidly improving health among middle class patients, who are less likely to smoke, have a better diet and consult their doctors more readily. Health Secretary John Reid is concerned that the NHS too often fails to understand the reasons why poorer people take risks with their health and wants spending to be better targeted. Gaby Hinsliff, chief political correspondent Sunday June 27, 2004 The Observer
  • Independent NHS inspectors accused the government last night of shortchanging patients in some of the poorest parts of England by denying their local hospitals and GPs a fair share of resources. The Healthcare Commission disclosed that NHS trusts in areas with the greatest medical problems were losing up to 20% of the money they were due under the official formula for assessing local health needs, agreed in December 2002. They are being starved of cash because ministers feared the consequences of reallocating resources from well-heeled areas that were found to be overfunded. John Carvel, social affairs editor Thursday July 8, 2004 The Guardian
  • NHS managers today called for a special investment fund for health improvement in the wake of a watchdog's report showing that poorer areas with worse health were being starved of cash. The NHS Confederation argues that ringfencing money for long-term public health improvements will prevent it being sucked into day to day priorities such as waiting list surgery and medical services. Tash Shifrin Thursday July 8, 2004
  • Healthcare professionals should help patients build up the knowledge and skills to take a more active role in looking after their health, according to consumer campaigners. The National Consumer Council (NCC) said today that the only way to close the gap in healthcare inequalities between rich and poor was to improve people's confidence to manage their own health. Wednesday August 4, 2004
  • Doctors are rebelling over plans that would lead to thousands of refugees being refused life-saving treatment for HIV on the National Health Service. The Observer has learnt that specialists on a key health committee have refused to help draw up rules that would determine whether asylum seekers or other immigrants with the virus get antiretroviral drugs. One said: 'It is morally repugnant for us to have to look at someone's immigration status before giving them the treatment they need. Let's be clear about this: if they don't get the treatment, it's a death sentence.' Jo Revill, health editor Sunday August 8, 2004 The Observer
  • The government was accused yesterday of failing to tackle the HIV/Aids crisis in its own back yard while focusing on trying to help the international battle against the disease. The National Aids Trust said sexual health had dropped off the list of national priorities with anti-HIV funds no longer ring-fenced. This has meant a drop in education and prevention programmes and long waiting times for tests. People at high risk of infection, including prostitutes and injecting drug users, were treated as criminals while the NHS's attitude towards failed asylum seekers needed reviewing. James Meikle, health correspondent Monday August 9, 2004 The Guardian
  • Social exclusion: the facts. The National Consumer Council has put together a dossier highlighting the "double disadvantages" faced by Britain's poorer people in the hope of bringing about change. But just how much are poorer people being financially penalised? Wednesday September 15, 2004
  • A widening of the life expectancy gap between the prosperous south and the conurbations of north Britain was disclosed yesterday by the Office for National Statistics. John Carvel, social affairs editor Saturday October 16, 2004 The Guardian
  • Private healthcare will benefit poor, says Reid. Patrick Wintour, chief political correspondent Wednesday January 19, 2005 The Guardian
  • People in the cities of northern England are almost twice as likely to die of cancer as those in affluent areas of the south, the Commons public accounts committee says in a report issued today. Their cancer is likely to be more advanced by the time it is diagnosed and they are less likely to survive, it says after investigating the disease which accounts for a quarter of all deaths. John Carvel, social affairs editor Tuesday January 25, 2005 The Guardian
  • People in the most prosperous neighbourhoods of England enjoy 17 more years of fit and active life than those in the poorest, the Office for National Statistics said yesterday. The most thorough analysis of health inequalities yet undertaken found the connection between income and wellbeing is much stronger than previously thought. John Carvel Friday February 25, 2005 The Guardian
  • The NHS must do more to address heart disease in the poorest communities, where high levels of smoking and obesity mean people are at the greatest risk of dying from it, the Healthcare Commission says today. Sarah Boseley, health editor Monday March 7, 2005 The Guardian
  • An international charity well known for providing aid to impoverished groups in developing countries has now set its sights on helping deprived Londoners, it emerged today. Hélène Mulholland and agencies Monday May 23, 2005
  • Médecins du Monde, an organisation usually associated with medical care for the poor and sick of developing countries, is planning to set up three clinics in London to treat people the NHS does not reach. The organisation says it has three target groups of vulnerable people whose needs are not being met: vulnerable migrants, homeless people and street sex workers. Anybody who has their application to stay in the UK turned down is no longer eligible for NHS care, even if they remain here for some time before returning home. Sarah Boseley Tuesday May 24, 2005 The Guardian
  • Thousands of deaths from cancer might be prevented each year by reducing the north-south divide in terms of poverty, smoking and drinking, experts said yesterday. Incidence and death rates for cancers of the lung, voice-box, lip, mouth and throat are all higher than average in the former industrial areas of northern England and central Scotland, according to a cancer atlas published by the Office of National Statistics (ONS). James Meikle, health correspondent Wednesday July 6, 2005 The Guardian
  • Two million people are unable to register for NHS dental care because of a national shortage of 1,850 dentists, MPs revealed today in a report criticising the slow pace of change on dental reforms. There are "dismaying" variations in dental health across England with a clear north-south divide, according to a report published today by the House of Commons public accounts committee. Debbie Andalo and agencies Thursday July 14, 2005
  • Inequality kills. What counts is not wealth or poverty, says Polly Toynbee after reading Richard G Wilkinson's The Impact of Inequality, but your place on the social ladder. Saturday July 30, 2005 The Guardian
  • People in the poorest communities with the biggest social needs are getting a raw deal from the welfare state, said a report yesterday from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. It found that areas with relatively poor standards of health have fewer doctors per head of population. John Carvel, social affairs editor Friday September 2, 2005 The Guardian
  • Your article about Ryzard (No direction home, October 19) draws attention to the fact that migrant workers cannot claim benefits and may be refused NHS treatment. Is a nurse from overseas (quite a proportion of the total) to be denied treatment in the hospital they work in? What happens if someone is working in a hospital for mentally ill people and joins the 40,000 attacked each year? Will they be treated on the NHS or will they have to go private and sue their attacker (presumably without legal aid) for the cost? The government is quite prepared to have large parts of our economy operated by foreign labour but is not willing to pay them the benefits us natives get. Phil McShane Nuffield department of surgery, John Radcliffe hospital, Oxford  Wednesday October 26, 2005 The Guardian
  • As the December deadline looms, the delivery of the government's flagship patient choice policy is in doubt. The e-booking computer system won't be up and running for a year, many GPs are disengaged from the choice initiative, and hospitals are feeling the financial strain of money following the patient. Technology can be fixed, professionals can be won over, and finances plugged, but the biggest risk of patient choice may be its impact on the under-reported problem of healthcare inequalities.  Patient choice risks widening health inequalities, says Joe Farrington-Douglas.  Wednesday November 16, 2005 The Guardian
  • The first evidence that financial problems in the NHS are forcing trusts to ration operations came yesterday with an announcement that overweight people in East Anglia will be denied replacement joints, even if they are in serious pain. East Suffolk primary care trusts said patients will no longer be considered for hip and knee replacements at Ipswich hospital if they have a body mass index of more than 30, the clinical definition of obesity. John Carvel, social affairs editor Wednesday November 23, 2005 The Guardian
  • The decision by some NHS trusts to deny hip and knee replacement surgery to obese patients has been criticised by doctors. Last month it emerged that obese people would not be entitled to such surgery on the NHS in East Suffolk. The ruling came as part of a series of measures to be taken by the three primary care trusts in the area in an attempt to save money locally for the NHS. It is believed that the risks of operating on obese patients are higher and the treatment may be less effective, with replacement joints wearing out sooner. But Nicholas Finer, a consultant in obesity medicine at Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge, challenged claims that surgery could be withheld on the grounds of increased risks for obese people, saying no evidence supports withholding joint replacement from obese people. Friday December 16, 2005 6:58 AM
  • Those who want to shrink the state forget who pays the bills. Conservatives must do more than back social enterprise to dispel their reputation as blinkered tax-cutters. Polly Toynbee Friday January 13, 2006 The Guardian
  • Five years after the government launched its reforming 10-year cancer plan, surviving the disease still depends on where you live, a parliamentary select committee said yesterday. Those in London and the south have a better chance of beating the disease and better access to drugs, said the public accounts committee. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (Nice) was set up to end "postcode prescribing", but the breast cancer drug Herceptin, for instance, was given to 90% of women in some areas in 2003 and to just 10% in others. Sarah Boseley Thursday January 26, 2006 The Guardian
  • NHS prescription charges work against aims of new white paper. The Commons health select committee has been told that the prescription charging system makes it more difficult to reduce health inequalities for people in underserved deprived areas.  Summary by Keep our NHS Public of British Medical Journal 10 February 2006
  • We must choose equality. The government's drive to give more choice in public services risks excluding minority ethnic communities, warns Nick Johnson. Wednesday March 1, 2006
  • Importance of relative measures in policy on health inequalities. Government figures showing a reduction in health inequalities for diseases such as cancer and heart disease are misleading, according to a study by health economist Allan Low and Director of public health, Anne Low. The government sometimes uses relative gaps between groups, and at other times absolute gaps. The authors say: "Lack of transparency in this regard has led to the inconsistent use of relative and absolute gaps in government targets going unquestioned. It has also resulted in confusion over how to establish local health improvement targets that are consistent with national policy on reducing health inequalities."  Summary by Keep our NHS Public of British Medical Journal 21 April 2006
  • Long live the NHS. A coalition of groups have sent a joint letter to the Times defending a tax funded healthcare system against attacks from groups like Reform. The letter is signed by the British Medical Association, the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, Diabetes UK, the Family Planning Association, Macmillan Cancer Support, the New Health Network, the NHS Confederation, the Royal College of Midwives, the Royal College of Nursing, Unison, the Sainsbury's Centre for Mental Health, and Turning Point. It says: "In the week of the 60th anniversary of the second reading of the NHS Bill, we would like to take the opportunity to state our belief that the United Kingdom is fortunate to have one of the fairest health systems in the world where no one need fear becoming bankrupt because of their need to fund their healthcare. It has dedicated staff who are driven by a passion for patient care and has been transforming itself into a 21st-century healthcare system of which we can all be proud. The continued commitment of funding through tax ensures equity for patients but also makes economic sense because it is the cheapest way of collecting money. If a system is unaffordable through tax it is not affordable through any other funding system. International experience shows there is no necessary link between how systems perform and how they are funded. Any move to a health insurance system to charge patients for their care would increase bureaucracy and would leave those who need the most care with the greatest financial burden. We are not complacent. The NHS will need to respond to the tide of rising expectations and need by improving efficiency and responsiveness. With the dedication and commitment of staff we believe that the NHS can continue its transformation and be a model for other countries." Summary by Keep our NHS Public of  Times 27 April 2006
  • Hewitt ignored St Helier warnings. Patricia Hewitt ignored public health advice on health inequalities to site the new south London critical care hospital at St Helier rather than Sutton. Hewitt overturned the decision of the local NHS, saying that the hospital siting should "give priority to the needs of those communities that suffer the worst social and economic disadvantage". But when she said this she already had a report prepared at her request, which advised her to accept the judgement of the local NHS and concluded that "there is no essential difference between the two sites in terms of their impact on health inequalities". Conservative MP for Epsom, Chris Grayling, accused the government of "blatant political gerrymandering", as the hospital was sited in a Labour area. Summary by Keep our NHS Public of  Health Service Journal 11 May 2006
  • The price of everything. David Janner-Klausner argues that introducing a market into local health provision can in theory increase user 'choice'. But in practice the most likely result is that a few giant firms will end up running all the services in ever-larger areas. He writes: "There is a risk that the mechanisms introduced to increase choice will harm the very communities that Le Grand argues would benefit most from it. The point is not only to provide choice, but also to understand the nature of it, including who the operators are, whom they employ and whether the competition between them will be real…The reality will be the emergence of a small number of suppliers, awarded ever-larger contracts. A similar consolidation has taken place in the bus market following deregulation…For smaller companies, training, innovation and participating in bidding processes costs proportionately more than for larger ones. If they need to invest to fulfil a contract, they are likely to be considered a risky prospect by lenders because their income streams are not as diverse as those of larger providers. If they are charities, their ability to assume risk is even more limited…if commissioners try to include knowledge-sharing clauses in contracts, they are likely to find that contractors put a price on sharing their intellectual property with competitors, if they are willing to do so at all. This will make market-based provision more expensive and will slow down innovation when the goal is to speed it up…Since the government is committed to developing local markets, the likely outcome is that larger companies will have the edge. Furthermore, commissioners will be tempted to get together and offer larger contracts, as this can cut costs. Smaller companies will lose out and agglomeration is almost inevitable. The impact on costs and quality of outcomes is unclear to say the least. Summary by Keep our NHS Public of  Public Finance 12 May 2006
  • Patient Choice 'favours the educated'. The government is pressing ahead with an extension to its Patient Choice initiative, despite new evidence from the Department of Health that shows well-educated patients benefit most from the reforms. Since January 1, patients have been able to choose where they receive their hospital treatment from a list of at least four providers. But from this week patients can also choose to be treated at the 32 existing foundation trusts. But research commissioned by the DoH from consultancy Rand Europe, the King's Fund think-tank and City University, London, revealed that Patient Choice risks widening health inequalities. The study surveyed 1,000 people in England who had been referred to hospital over the past five years. It found patients with formal educational qualifications were more likely to choose a hospital with higher clinical standards. Those without qualifications placed less importance on above-average clinical quality. Summary by Keep our NHS Public of  Public Finance 2 June 2006
  • To those that have shall be given. New research into GP referral rates in primary care trusts in England yields startling results: referrals seem to decline steadily as deprivation and need increase. The analysis has been conducted by data analysts Dr Foster Intelligence. The Airedale PCT in West Yorkshire, for instance, had one of the lowest rates, with referrals 42% below the norm. At the other end of the scale, Barnet's practices in suburban north London had a referral rate 52% above average. All three Bradford trusts, next to Airedale, had referral rates 30%-35% below average, as did Blackburn with Darwen PCT in Lancashire. By contrast, Richmond and Twickenham in south London, Huntingdonshire in Cambridgeshire, North East Oxfordshire and South West Oxfordshire referred at more than double those rates. Summary by Keep our NHS Public of  Guardian 14 June 2006
  • Watchdog delivers wake-up call over PBC shortcomings. The Audit Commission has sent the Government a wake-up call over its plans for practice-based commissioning, highlighting inadequate incentives, poor value for money and conflicts of interest. It said the Government's flagship scheme risks "exacerbating financial pressures", "widening inequalities" and wasting money. The criticisms are drawn from an investigation of four PCTs selected for being "relatively successful" implementers of the scheme. Summary by Keep our NHS Public of Pulse 16 June 2006
  • We are making our children ill with unrealisable expectations. Young people are paying the price for an economy driven by dissatisfaction, in which social mobility is in sharp decline. George Monbiot Tuesday June 27, 2006 The Guardian
  • Smokers who need heart bypasses and alcoholics who need liver transplants should not get them free on the NHS, according to four out of 10 hospital doctors. A quarter of those questioned in a survey also believe obese patients should not be given free anti-obesity drugs or receive free orthopaedic treatments.  Sarah Hall, health correspondent Thursday June 29, 2006 The Guardian [Unequal treatment positively correlated with poverty]
  • Cancer patients and women about to give birth who have been denied asylum in the UK are being refused care by NHS hospitals unless they can pay thousands of pounds for their treatment, it is revealed today. Asylum seekers are vulnerable and usually destitute, says a report from the Refugee Council, which says the failure to treat people who are at risk of dying is a breach of the human rights enshrined in the NHS core principles.  Sarah Boseley, health editor Thursday June 29, 2006 The Guardian
  • Some of the poorest areas of London with the worst health problems are to bear the brunt of a fresh round of spending cuts imposed by the new NHS chief executive, David Nicholson, to try to drag the service out of the red. Health budgets for east London are being slashed in a further wave of savings designed to meet a persisting £70m shortfall in NHS funding in the capital. Tower Hamlets is to lose £2.4m, Newham £2.5m, and City and Hackney £4.4m. Further east, Barking and Dagenham must hand back as much as £6.7m. In another controversial part of the cuts package, all London NHS trusts that provide services and which balanced their books last year must forfeit any surplus they carried forward. Half of the 16 trusts affected are mental health providers, which together must surrender £14.4m, cash they saved and were reinvesting. David Brindle Monday August 7, 2006 The Guardian
  • Report calls for 'radical action' to plug Manchester health gap. 'Concerted radical action' is required to plug the growing health inequalities gap across Greater Manchester, according to a report from the Audit Commission. The review found there is 'no clear leadership for the health inequalities agenda' in the region. It criticises 'constant' local and national reconfiguration for preventing progress in reducing the health inequalities gap and says reconfiguration in the NHS 'is damaging the potential for more successful joint developments'. The report concludes that leadership of the health inequalities agenda in Greater Manchester is often via the director of public health and says that changes to acute services are driven by new builds and clinical services without any 'explicit' expectation that change will lead to improved health. Faculty of Public Health president Professor Rod Griffiths said he was not surprised by the findings: 'A lot of this is to do with the government's manic desire to keep reorganising the health service it does not say much for the government's vision that health inequalities in Greater Manchester are still so bad.' Summary by Keep our NHS Public of Health Service Journal 7 September 2006
  • Tony Blair today urged people to take more responsibility for their fitness and diet, as a new study revealed a continuing north-south divide in the nation's health. But the prime minister accepted that economic deprivation was a key factor in poor public health. Asked about health inequalities on BBC Breakfast, Mr Blair said: "I have to say it is to do with poverty. It's to do with diet, it's to do with exercise. It starts at school and it starts with what parents feed their children."  Matt Weaver and agencies Tuesday October 10, 2006 Guardian Unlimited
  • Blair plans new social contract. A new contract between the state and the citizen setting out what individuals must do in return for quality services from hospitals, schools and the police is one of the key proposals emerging from a Downing Street initiated policy review. Examples include an expectation that a local health authority will only offer a hip replacement if the patient undertakes to keep their weight down. The review is likely to examine fundamentally the future relationship between citizen and state. The public service commission has been asked to consider "whether it is possible to move from an implicit one-way contract based on outputs, to one based on explicit mutually agreed outcomes". It asks "should we be aiming for a more explicit statement of the contract that covers both the service offered by the public sector (what is in and what is not) and what is expected from citizens (beyond paying taxes and obeying the law)". Summary by Keep our NHS Public of Guardian 24 November 2006
  • Private health check-ups in executive scheme. A private company is performing thousands of patient check-ups as part of a flagship scheme. Nurses employed by management consultants Refer2Us are being brought in to screen people at risk of illnesses such as heart disease in some of Scotland's most deprived communities. The first phase of the work in Lanarkshire is being funded by drugs company AstraZeneca to the tune of £100,000. The situation has emerged at a time when doctors and campaigners are calling for a moratorium on private sector involvement in the Scottish NHS to allow a public debate about the issue. Concern has been expressed about contracting out work which is part of such a high-profile Scottish Executive initiative to tackle the nation's entrenched health inequalities. Four different health boards are piloting the Keep Well project, which was announced by Health Minister Andy Kerr last year. It targets people in poorer areas who are more likely to become ill but less likely to seek healthcare. NHS Lothian, NHS Tayside and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said they had no plans to farm out the work to private firms. However, NHS Lanarkshire, which has made the deal with Refer2Us and AstraZeneca, said that it had turned to the private sector because of the high number of patients needed to be seen. Senior doctors have questioned how patients will be handed from the Refer2Us nurses to the NHS for follow-up treatment and advice, and how this will affect the chance to build longer term relationships with hard-to-reach patients. Professor Allyson Pollock, of the centre for international public health policy at Edinburgh University, said: "The whole point about Keep Well is for it to work it should be integrated into community health services and this is an example of disintegration and fragmentation. The health minister has repeatedly said they are doing things differently in Scotland because they are integrating healthcare, but this is an example where it is not happening." She added that in the United States it was a known tactic of the pharmaceutical industry to become directly involved in the disease management of patients. "We know the pharmaceutical purpose is to open and expand markets," she added. A spokesman for NHS Lanarkshire said: "This involvement is at no cost to the NHS and, without this contribution, it would not have been possible to provide the benefits of Keep Well to patients as early in the project… It is not an alternative to NHS Lanarkshire providing these services. Summary by Keep our NHS Public of Herald 20 December 2006
  • Poor babies 'up to seven times' more likely to die. Babies born in poor parts of England or to parents from ethnic minorities are up to seven times as likely to die before the age of one as those born in the richest areas, a government review has found. The Department of Health's Review of health inequalities: infant mortality, published on February 7, found that the gap between the infant mortality rate for the general population and that for the poorest social classes has widened by six percentile points since 1999 to 19%. The infant mortality rate in the general population was 4.9 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2004, but for infants born to parents in low-paid, manual and routine jobs, it was 5.9 per 1,000 live births. This makes it unlikely that the government will achieve its Public Service Agreement to reduce inequalities between the two groups by 10% by 2010. Between 2002 and 2004, 9,132 infants under the age of one died, and the review confirmed that a disproportionate number of these - 40% - were born to low-income families. The review was commissioned by ministers concerned with a lack of progress on the PSA target. Summary by Keep our NHS Public of Public Finance 16 February 2007
  • Doubts over bid to charge foreigners for NHS care. A fresh drive to charge foreign nationals, including illegal immigrants, for National Health Service care has been announced by John Reid, the home secretary - but well ahead of the health department being able to say how that will work in practice. Mr Reid announced pilot schemes to be run in three unidentified trusts in which hospitals and GPs will be able to check patients' eligibility for free treatment against data held by the Border and Immigration Agency. From 2008, all foreign nationals will have to have identity cards with records held on a national database. The Department of Health rejected fears that the pilots would result in NHS medical records and information being made available to law-enforcement officers. A spokesman said "categorically" that the information flow would be one way - the immigration agency providing data to the NHS. "We will not be breaching [medical] confidentiality in any way, or handing over records or identity information to the Border and Immigration Agency." In the past, the British Medical Association has said it would be "totally unjustifiable" to try to charge impecunious failed asylum-seekers who have no money. The Home Office appears to regard the pilot schemes as a potentially important building block in the development of the government's ID-card system. But Connecting for Health, the NHS information technology programme, has consistently rejected the idea of using such cards to establish entitlement to treatment. Summary by Keep our NHS Public of Financial Times 8 March 2007
  • Blow for Brown as poverty figures increase after years of decline. Poverty has increased for the first time in almost a decade and the number of children living in poor families has risen for the first time in six years, the government admitted yesterday. Opposition politicians and poverty campaigners said a core government policy was failing and warned that its 2010 target could be missed by a million children, in spite of measures announced by Gordon Brown in last week's budget. Official figures showed relative poverty - those living on less than 60% of average incomes - rose to 12.7 million people in 2005-06, from 12.1 million the year before.It brings to an end the longest period of falling poverty since records began in 1961. The number of children living in poor families rose by 200,000 to 3.8 million. A single person is now considered poor if he or she earns less than £145 a week, while a couple with two children is poor if their income is less than £332 a week. Ashley Seager Wednesday March 28, 2007 The Guardian
  • Ministers deliberately making asylum seekers destitute, say MPs. Ministers are deliberately making vulnerable asylum seekers destitute, a committee of MPs and peers claimed today. They accused the government of inflicting unacceptable and inhumane treatment, and described the asylum system as a "confusing mess". A deliberate policy of refusing benefits to some asylum seekers combined with a ban on legal working left many would-be refugees in "appalling" circumstances, a report by the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) said. It highlighted one case of a destitute Rwandan asylum seeker who suffered bowel cancer and had a colostomy bag but was refused treatment by a hospital and could not even register with a GP. In another, a woman was forced to live rough for three months - sitting at crowded bus stops all night because she was terrified of being alone - but on winning her asylum appeal was ruled entitled to immediate support. It also reported how parents of a three-week-old baby were housed in a "filthy, bug-infested room" in Leicester, and how a penniless Chinese asylum seeker arrived "exhausted and distressed" at an agency after carrying her newborn baby around in a towel for a week. Andrew Dismore, chairman of the JCHR, said: "The system of asylum seeker support is a confusing mess, and the policy of enforced destitution must cease. Press Association Friday March 30, 2007 Guardian Unlimited
  • Rise in poverty worse than stated. The increase in people living in poverty is worse than official figures claimed, it emerged yesterday, after the Department of Work and Pensions found its statistics had underestimated the rise by 100,000. Last month's figures showed the first rise in poverty in almost a decade, ending the longest period of falling poverty since records began in 1961, and leading the Opposition and campaigners to warn that the government was failing to tackle the issue it made a priority. Tania Branigan, political correspondent Tuesday April 24, 2007 The Guardian
  • Inequality at same level as under Thatcher. Labour's decade in power has failed to reverse the surge in inequality under Margaret Thatcher and Gordon Brown's policies to support the less well-off are failing to prevent the gap between rich and poor widening again, official figures showed yesterday. Larry Elliott, economics editor Friday May 18, 2007 The Guardian
  • Finally ministers are off the leash and free to say the rich are too bloody rich. Brown has now accepted what Blair would not: the growing gap between rich and poor is splitting and damaging our society. Polly Toynbee Friday May 18, 2007 The Guardian
  • Single equality act under threat, warn campaigners. The government is at risk of missing a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to tackle discrimination as internal disputes delay a single equality act, campaigners are warning. Labour MPs have warned that radical action is needed to close the pay gap faced by women and members of ethnic minorities, while the charity Age Concern yesterday cautioned that the government would inevitably lose its battle against social exclusion unless it outlawed ageism. But a long-awaited green paper, due for publication this month following a two-year review of the law, has been postponed again due to disagreements over its contents - which campaigners argue are already too weak. The document is the first step towards a single equality act, which is now unlikely to clear parliament before its fourth session begins in November 2008. Angela Eagle, former race relations minister and MP for Wallasey, warned: "This is one of those once in a lifetime chances to make progress in a very important area which has been underdeveloped in the last few years. Tania Branigan and John Carvel Friday May 18, 2007 SocietyGuardian.co.uk
  • Survey reveals stark contrasts in England's health. There is a clear divide in the health of England's population with southerners living longer and enjoying far healthier lifestyles than northerners, according to a government survey. The Department of Health study, which was published last night, reveals that people living in councils in the north west have the worst health profiles in England. Residents are more likely to die from smoking-related illnesses, heart disease, strokes and cancer than anywhere else in the country. Manchester has the lowest life expectancy for men at 72.5 years, well below England's average of 76.9. Liverpool has the lowest life expectancy for women at 78.1 years (average, 81.1 years). Liverpool also has the highest rate of hospital admissions for alcohol-related problems at 652 per 100,000 (average, 248 per 100,000). Knowsley has the highest rate of deaths from smoking at 366 deaths per 100,000 (average, 234 per 100,000). Manchester also had the highest levels of early death from heart diseases and strokes at 151 per 100,000 (average, 900 per 100,000). David Batty and agencies Friday June 22, 2007 Guardian Unlimited
  • Lack of data hampers PCTs' efforts to ensure race equality in local health services, says King’s Fund report. The ability of Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) to understand the health needs of ethnically diverse communities and improve access to services, is being undermined by a lack of data about who uses which NHS services, according to an audit published today by the King’s Fund  Care & Health 23 June 2007
  • Pregnant migrants are unfairly denied NHS treatment, says charity.  Report tells of lack of access to antenatal care.  Clinic says findings 'rebut myth of health tourist'. Pregnant women are being denied antenatal care by the NHS because of their immigration status, endangering mother and baby, a medical charity has found. Médecins du Monde, which normally works in deprived and developing parts of the world, set up a clinic in London a year ago because of concerns that some people were struggling to get healthcare in one of the world's richest cities. One year on, its experience shows that the NHS, intended to be free to all, is not available to some of those who need it and who, under the letter of the law, are entitled to medical help. Sarah Boseley, health editor Wednesday July 4, 2007 The Guardian
  • Health Tourists- More costly to ignore than to treat. A new report released today by Médecins du Monde UK, endorsed by Ken Livingstone and Neil Gerrard, MP, found that measures imposed to stop so-called health tourism are actually preventing vulnerable people living in the UK, including pregnant women, from accessing vital treatment.  Care & Health 5 July 2007
  • UK residents labelled as 'health tourists' have problems accessing health care. Some people in the United Kingdom are struggling to access routine medical care, including consultations with GPs and antenatal care, because they are wrongly being labelled as "health tourists," says a report. The report, from the charity Médecins du Monde UK, analyses the first year's activity of the charity in London, where it set up a clinic in the east end to improve access to health care for vulnerable people in and around the capital. The group says that regulations introduced in April 2004 to charge "overseas visitors" for NHS hospital treatment is making it difficult for some people who have legitimate rights to NHS treatment to get routine care. In 2006 a total of 349 people came to the Médecins du Monde clinic for 435 consultations. The most common request was for help to register with a GP. But worryingly, 39 pregnant women came to the clinic, half of whom had had no previous antenatal care, and nearly a quarter of whom were at least 20 weeks pregnant. Late access to maternity services is a risk factor for maternal death, says the report. But it found that 70% of the pregnant women who had come to the clinic had had difficulties in accessing primary care or antenatal services. At least 30% had not been tested for HIV. Instead of saving money, as was intended, the policy is likely to lead to increased costs because "those who are denied care become so ill that they need to access emergency treatment," said Susan Wright, director of Médecins du Monde UK. Paul Hunt, United Nations special rapporteur on the right to the highest attainable standard of health, says in a foreword to the report that "the rules governing entitlement to free NHS care in England, which introduced new and greater restrictions on access to health care for some migrants, seem to be taking us in the wrong direction. The legislation appears to be incompatible with fundamental right to health principles." Médecins du Monde, which generally provides health services to people in regions of conflict, poverty, and natural disasters, is calling for the restrictions on accessing UK health care based on immigration status to be removed, especially to maternity services. In a joint statement, the heads of nine campaigning groups, including Crisis, Doctors for Human Rights, Medact, and the Terrence Higgins Trust, backed the charity's demands. "Any restrictions on access to NHS health care based on immigration status pose public health problems, violate international law, compromise the independence of health professionals, and are likely to cost more than they save," they say in a statement. "We urge a return to NHS principles to ensure that everyone living in the UK has access to medical care, free at the point of need." Summary by Keep our NHS Public of British Medical Journal 13 July 2007
  • A divided country: study reveals growing UK wealth segregation. Poor and wealthy households in Britain are becoming more and more segregated from the rest of society as the UK faces the highest inequality levels for 40 years, according to a study published today. A report by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation provides a groundbreaking geographical analysis of changes in the distribution of wealth over time, and reveals an increasingly divided nation. It shows that already rich areas - particularly the south-east of England - have become disproportionately wealthier over four decades, while in areas of some cities more than half of all households are now "breadline poor", on a level of relative poverty with enough to live on but without access to opportunities enjoyed by the rest of society, yet above the level of absolute poverty, or "core poor". Lucy Ward, social affairs correspondent Tuesday July 17, 2007 The Guardian.  Map: the gulf between Britain's rich and poor
  • Urban Britain is heading for Victorian levels of inequality. The chasm between rich and poor seen in London today resembles the Manchester that Engels described in the 1840s. Tristram Hunt Wednesday July 18, 2007 The Guardian
  • Getting rights right. Primary care trusts need to develop a strategy to tackle equality and human rights, writes Blair McPherson. Friday July 20, 2007 SocietyGuardian.co.uk
  • North-south divide will narrow but not rich-poor gap, says report. Britain's economy is likely to see a better balance of growth between regions as the traditional divide between northern manufacturing and southern services blurs and more companies opt to move out of the overcrowded south-east and London, according to a leading City economist. However, the gap between the richest and poorest could become worse, according to Roger Bootle, chief economic adviser to professional services firm Deloitte and Touche. Writing in the latest issue of the Deloitte economic review, Mr Bootle argues that the UK economy is seriously unbalanced, with London and the south-east outstripping other regions, especially the east Midlands, the north-east and Wales, which have been disproportionately affected by the decline in manufacturing's share of the economy. He warns that the coming squeeze on government spending, which accounts for less than a third of gross domestic product in the south-east but up to 60% in Wales, coupled with the continuing strength of London's financial services sector, will mean "the 'haves' are likely to become 'have mores' and the gap in incomes between the country's richest and poorest regions is likely to increase". Mark Milner Monday July 23, 2007 The Guardian
  • Richest patients choosing hospitals. Research from Bristol University has shown that wealthier people travel further to be treated at their hospital of choice. The research, carried out by Professor Carol Propper and her team, revealed that the new "choose and book" system, will only aggravate the difference between rich and poor. The researchers say GPs in less affluent areas, but not those in richer areas, should encourage patients to exercise the right to choose hospitals for treatment, and that poorer patients should be helped with travel costs. Professor Propper said that more middle-class people were likely to get their GPs to refer them their hospital of choice, and that poorer people may be put off by the cost of travel. Bristol Evening Post 7 August 2007
  • NHS money should be focused on poor areas, voters say. The Government is under pressure to close Britain's "health inequalities" gap amid growing public concern that the poorest people get a raw deal from the National Health Service. Care & Health 19 September 2007
  • Primary care inequalities to be Johnson's top focus. In his first major speech as health secretary, Alan Johnson has promised to tackle health inequalities and place primary care at the centre of government efforts on the health service. "Inequalities in health mirror wider injustices in society. But we could and should be doing much more as a department to tackle them," he told an invited audience at a New Health Network event. "We must ensure tackling health inequalities is fully integrated into commissioning and the operational framework," he said. "The prime minister and I will put improvements to primary care at the forefront of our quest to improve the health of the whole nation," said Mr Johnson. Gordon Brown has already said he was prioritising access to primary care and trusts have been instructed to produce plans to this effect. Mr Johnson said: "The local GP practice is the principal gateway to the NHS so if the quantity, the quality and accessibility of GP services are uneven it's no wonder that health inequalities are prevalent." He said doctors' surgeries must be open "at times that suit the patients rather than the practice." Mr Johnson said the Department of Health would produce a strategy programme on access and prevention and he would begin publishing life expectancy at ward level to highlight health inequality. "Public health issues must be elevated to the top of the national agenda by a DoH which takes an even more active role in encouraging active lifestyles," he said. He added that the problem of alcohol would be focused on over the next few months. Summary by Keep our NHS Public of Health Service Journal 20 September 2007
  • NHS Confederation says a personalised NHS should reach out to the most excluded. Moves to create a personalised NHS must start with the most excluded and work to tackle health inequality, says the NHS Confederation today in a new report called ‘In sickness and in health'. Care & Health 5 October 2007
  • North-south divide widens in health map of England. People living in northern England are more likely than their southern neighbours to smoke and drink to excess. Their mental health is poorer and life expectancy is up to three years shorter than in the south. The regional health divide emerged starkly in a health profile of England, published yesterday by the Department of Health. It showed the NHS has made great strides in reducing the number of people dying from cancer and heart attacks. Infant mortality is at its lowest level and fewer people are smoking. But more people consider themselves in poor health than when Labour came to power in 1997 and the inequalities between north and south are wider than ever. John Carvel, social affairs editor Tuesday October 23, 2007 The Guardian
  • The north-south divide moves north. David Ward Wednesday October 24, 2007 The Guardian
  • Variations persist in life expectancy by social class. While life expectancy has risen for all social classes over the last 30 years, people in professional occupations (Social Class I) have the longest expectation of life, followed by managerial and technical occupations (Social Class II), and so on. People in unskilled manual occupations (Social Class V) have the shortest expectation of life. Care & Health 25 October 2007
  • The fruits of Kiwi health reform. Slowly but surely, the health reform tide in England is turning. Gordon Brown and health ministers have signalled their intention to place much greater emphasis on public health than their predecessors, alongside a continuing commitment to improve the performance of the NHS. Lord Darzi's interim report on the NHS specifically highlighted the need to make more progress in tackling health inequalities. With a boy born in Manchester likely to die almost 10 years earlier than a boy born in Kensington and Chelsea, a concerted drive to improve health by focusing on people most in need seems certain to loom large in the next stage of health reform. Last week's announcement that the government is planning 10 eco cities, designed to make it easier for people to exercise, is an indication of the way in which ministers are thinking. The risk with this approach is that it will become just another initiative unless it is part of a well-designed public health strategy. Ministers should look to New Zealand for lessons on how to avoid risk. Recent analysis showed that the widening of health inequalities there has been stemmed and, to some degree, reversed. Although the precise reasons are not fully known, inequalities in New Zealand appear to have been tackled successfully as a result of a long-term commitment to public health and primary care. Under prime minister Helen Clark, New Zealand turned its back on the failed internal market experiment of the 1990s, and set up health boards - integrated organisations whose members are made up of some people elected by the public and others appointed by the health minister - with responsibility for planning and providing health and disability support services. Health inequalities in New Zealand are most evident in the poorer health experienced by Maori and people from the Pacific Islands. To address these inequalities, Clark's government developed a health strategy in 2000 in which public health received as much attention as healthcare services. The strategy included health boards working with public agencies and third sector organisations to implement population-wide programmes to address risk factors such as unhealthy diet and lack of exercise. A major focus of these programmes has been to target support at hard-to-reach groups by working with Maori and Pacific Island organisations. In the case of people from the Pacific Islands, health boards have capitalised on the role that religious life plays in these communities, by delivering health advice and medical care with and through churches. Similarly, tribal structures have been engaged to reach the groups most in need among Maori. Equally important has been the emphasis on primary healthcare. Concerned at the adverse effects of charging patients to see a GP, Clark's government developed a primary care strategy that has resulted in an investment of NZ$2.2bn (£0.81bn) over seven years. The fees paid by patients and the costs of prescriptions have fallen considerably, making it easier for families on low incomes to get care. This has contributed to a stronger emphasis on prevention in primary care, with a particular focus on the management of people with diabetes. Patients in New Zealand find it much easier to make an appointment than their counterparts in the UK because GPs lose income if patients seek primary care from a practice other than the one where they are registered. The Brown government would do well to consider how to adapt this arrangement. An option would be to claw back funds GPs receive from the government where practices have higher than expected use of services by patients out of hours. This could be done while maintaining care free to patients at the point of access - an aspect of the NHS superior to that found in New Zealand. Another lesson from New Zealand is the value of local people involved in health boards. The two-thirds of members elected by the public are chosen every three years, with elections held at the same time as those for local authorities. Turnout is around 40%, and most candidates stand as independents. New Zealand's system has the twin virtues of engaging the community directly and avoiding the risks of overcentralisation to which the NHS is so prone. There is a greater willingness to deal with the challenges of the health system at a local level, instead of pulling these challenges in to the government in Wellington. At a time when the NHS is entering a much more difficult financial climate, Brown and health ministers may well be attracted to an arrangement where the blame for the NHS no longer gravitates towards Whitehall, but is dealt with by locally-accountable bodies. Chris Ham The Guardian Wednesday November 7 2007
  • A much exaggerated death. For decades, commentators anticipated the demise of the welfare state, but the true failure has been in the struggle with inequalities. Malcolm Dean The Guardian Wednesday November 7 2007
  • Inequalities in life expectancy at 65 in UK.  Men in Glasgow City can expect to live a further 13.8 years at age 65, the lowest life expectancy at this age in the UK, according to local area data released for the first time by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).  Care & Health 28 November 2007
  • Failed asylum seekers face healthcare ban. Controversial plans to bar hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants and failed asylum seekers from all but emergency health services are being considered by the Home Office. Amid claims the move will place increased strains on hospitals and inflame community tensions, The Observer can reveal a joint Department of Health and Home Office review examining proposals to restrict free access to GPs' surgeries for failed asylum seekers and 'irregular migrants' is due to report in the new year. Jamie Doward, home affairs editor Sunday December 2, 2007 The Observer
  • NHS care 'favours middle classes'. The NHS is a "divisive influence" which favours the assertive middle classes over poorer people, a study says. The report by centre-right think-tank Civitas said the health service was not providing equal treatment to all. It pointed out that people in deprived areas were often more in need of treatment, but less likely to get hip replacements or key x-rays. The report called for more use of the private sector, but other experts said this would just widen inequalities. Report author Nick Seddon said studies had shown that those on lower incomes made more use of primary care, but were less likely to be referred on for hospital treatment. He said this was partly attributable to the fact that middle classes were more assertive, articulate and confident in dealing with health professionals. He said part of the problem for the NHS was that it had made little use of the private sector. But Alex Nunns, of the Keep Our NHS Public campaign group, which represents health professionals, the public and academics, said: "The middle classes will always make the best of a system. In fact, there is evidence to show that when you involve the private sector, it just exacerbates the situation." Summary by Keep our NHS Public of BBC 11 December 2007

     

 See Society Guardian index on Social Exclusion and on Health Mapping.

Home ] Criticism ] Legislation on Health since Labour came into office ] Government Health Policy/Sources ] Comparison 2006 against 1997 Labour Party Manifesto ] National Plan for the NHS ] Patient and Public Involvement in Health ] NHS Standards ] Children's Services ] Public Health ] NHS Direct ] Foundation Hospitals ] Diagnostic and Treatment Centres ] Health Screening Programmes ] Patient Choice ] NHS Staffing ] Resources ] Private Sector Involvement ] Violence in Hospital ]

 Excessive Centralisation ] Unaccountable Delegation ] [ Impact of Inequality ] Initiative Overload ] Totalitarianism & Secrecy ] Complaints ]

Sheila Porter-Williams
Campaign for Health Service Democracy
Green Haven, Halfway Lane
Dunchurch
Rugby, Warwickshire CV22 6RD
sheilaCHSD@porter-williams.freeserve.co.uk